跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.13144 · v1

Teaching the Harness: Student-Aware Skill Transfer for LLM Agents

首次提交 2026-11-10 03:23
版本更新 2026-11-10 03:23
雷达观测 2026-11-11 11:04
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Effective teaching requires reasoning about the learner as well as the task, a capacity that Theory of Mind describes as inferring another agent's latent state from its behavior. We ask whether a stronger LLM teaches a fixed student better when it applies this principle. The student is an LLM agent acting through a harness that fixes its tools, context, and action budget, so a procedure that helps one model can exhaust the budget of another. We introduce Student-Aware Teaching (SAT). The teacher builds a learner model that pairs an empirical profile with hypotheses about the student's limitations, tests these hypotheses with diagnostic probes, and writes reusable skills for the diagnosed failures. A skill enters the library only after it raises success on matched development tasks. With Claude-Sonnet-5 teaching DeepSeek-V4-Flash, SAT reaches 86.46% task success across four primary runs, leading both a profile-free teacher with the same framework (81.04%) and the untaught student (75.00%) in each run. Removing the analytical learner model lowers both prediction and success, and under misleading learner profiles none of the 48 candidate skills passes admission. When DeepSeek-V4-Flash and Gemini-3.8-Flash exchange libraries, each performs better with its own. Saved libraries keep average gains of up to 11.1 points after the teacher leaves. The benefit depends on a student that can follow instructions and a deployment route that delivers them.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-10 03:23 · 最新观测版本

Teaching the Harness: Student-Aware Skill Transfer for LLM Agents

Effective teaching requires reasoning about the learner as well as the task, a capacity that Theory of Mind describes as inferring another agent's latent state from its behavior. We ask whether a stronger LLM teaches a fixed student better when it applies this principle. The student is an LLM agent acting through a harness that fixes its tools, context, and action budget, so a procedure that helps one model can exhaust the budget of another. We introduce Student-Aware Teaching (SAT). The teacher builds a learner model that pairs an empirical profile with hypotheses about the student's limitations, tests these hypotheses with diagnostic probes, and writes reusable skills for the diagnosed failures. A skill enters the library only after it raises success on matched development tasks. With Claude-Sonnet-5 teaching DeepSeek-V4-Flash, SAT reaches 86.46% task success across four primary runs, leading both a profile-free teacher with the same framework (81.04%) and the untaught student (75.00%) in each run. Removing the analytical learner model lowers both prediction and success, and under misleading learner profiles none of the 48 candidate skills passes admission. When DeepSeek-V4-Flash and Gemini-3.8-Flash exchange libraries, each performs better with its own. Saved libraries keep average gains of up to 11.1 points after the teacher leaves. The benefit depends on a student that can follow instructions and a deployment route that delivers them.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗