跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.13575 · v1

Greedy+Singleton for knapsack-constrained monotone submodular maximization has approximation ratio exactly $β^\star \approx 0.42944$

首次提交 2026-11-10 12:45
版本更新 2026-11-10 12:45
雷达观测 2026-11-11 11:04
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Greedy+Singleton is the textbook heuristic for monotone submodular maximization under a knapsack constraint: it returns the better of the cost-benefit greedy set and the best single item. Its worst-case approximation ratio, known only to lie in [0.427,0.42945][0.427, 0.42945] (Feldman-Nutov-Shoham; Kulik-Schwartz-Shachnai), is exactly an explicit constant β⋆≈0.42944β^\star\approx 0.42944. In the extremal instances, many cheap "filler" items wear down the value of two large optimal items while greedy spends the budget, until neither fits. This picture gives a sharper factor-revealing relaxation; we bound it analytically near the extremal parameters, up to finitely many interval-arithmetic checks, and certify it elsewhere by an exact branch-and-bound. The matching bad instances are tie-free and checkable by hand. For the version that stops at the first item that does not fit, Wolsey's bound 1−e−βW≈0.357801-e^{-β_W}\approx 0.35780, where eβW=2−βWe^{β_W}=2-β_W, is tight; Wolsey stated this for his variant without giving the instances, and we give an explicit family with no ties that also covers comparison with the best feasible singleton. The CELF rule also has ratio exactly β⋆β^\star.

作者备注:26 pages, 4 figures. Code and certificates: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24023723

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-10 12:45 · 最新观测版本

Greedy+Singleton for knapsack-constrained monotone submodular maximization has approximation ratio exactly $β^\star \approx 0.42944$

Greedy+Singleton is the textbook heuristic for monotone submodular maximization under a knapsack constraint: it returns the better of the cost-benefit greedy set and the best single item. Its worst-case approximation ratio, known only to lie in [0.427,0.42945][0.427, 0.42945] (Feldman-Nutov-Shoham; Kulik-Schwartz-Shachnai), is exactly an explicit constant β⋆≈0.42944β^\star\approx 0.42944. In the extremal instances, many cheap "filler" items wear down the value of two large optimal items while greedy spends the budget, until neither fits. This picture gives a sharper factor-revealing relaxation; we bound it analytically near the extremal parameters, up to finitely many interval-arithmetic checks, and certify it elsewhere by an exact branch-and-bound. The matching bad instances are tie-free and checkable by hand. For the version that stops at the first item that does not fit, Wolsey's bound 1−e−βW≈0.357801-e^{-β_W}\approx 0.35780, where eβW=2−βWe^{β_W}=2-β_W, is tight; Wolsey stated this for his variant without giving the instances, and we give an explicit family with no ties that also covers comparison with the best feasible singleton. The CELF rule also has ratio exactly β⋆β^\star.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗