← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2611.14907 · v1
Lines Are Ideas: Visual Creativity Assessment in Hyperbolic Space
首次提交 2026-11-11 09:58
版本更新 2026-11-11 09:58
雷达观测 2026-11-13 10:09
摘要
Assessing human creativity from drawings provides a scalable way to evaluate human creative ability. However, existing approaches either rely on costly expert annotation or treat creativity as a single regression target, overlooking its underlying structure. Psychological theories have long emphasized that creativity emerges from balancing novelty and appropriateness. Motivated by this principle, we recast creativity as structured semantic deviation between paired drawings, where novelty measures the extent of departure from the original base sketch, and appropriateness determines whether such departures remain meaningful. This formulation naturally leads to a hyperbolic representation, in which novelty is quantified by geodesic distance and appropriateness is evaluated conditionally via a learned decision boundary, further regulated by an abstraction-conditioned adaptive constraint. Experiments on AuDrA-Drawings demonstrate state-of-the-art alignment with expert judgments and strong robustness under rater and task shifts. Beyond performance gains, our framework reveals an interpretable radial organization of creative variation, offering a principled geometric foundation for automatic creativity assessment.
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v1 · 2026-11-11 09:58 · 最新观测版本
Lines Are Ideas: Visual Creativity Assessment in Hyperbolic Space
Assessing human creativity from drawings provides a scalable way to evaluate human creative ability. However, existing approaches either rely on costly expert annotation or treat creativity as a single regression target, overlooking its underlying structure. Psychological theories have long emphasized that creativity emerges from balancing novelty and appropriateness. Motivated by this principle, we recast creativity as structured semantic deviation between paired drawings, where novelty measures the extent of departure from the original base sketch, and appropriateness determines whether such departures remain meaningful. This formulation naturally leads to a hyperbolic representation, in which novelty is quantified by geodesic distance and appropriateness is evaluated conditionally via a learned decision boundary, further regulated by an abstraction-conditioned adaptive constraint. Experiments on AuDrA-Drawings demonstrate state-of-the-art alignment with expert judgments and strong robustness under rater and task shifts. Beyond performance gains, our framework reveals an interpretable radial organization of creative variation, offering a principled geometric foundation for automatic creativity assessment.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗