跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.14962 · v1

FIRE: Failure Isolation and Reliability for Production-Connected Experiments at Scale

首次提交 2026-11-11 11:15
版本更新 2026-11-11 11:15
雷达观测 2026-11-13 10:09
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Pre-production changes are usually tested in isolated environments to prevent their side effects from reaching production. Some record-and-replay platforms allow a production-connected mode: candidate changes receive recorded production requests while selected downstream calls reach production dependencies. This improves fidelity before deployment, but it also introduces reliability risks. At hyperscale, experimental traffic can fan out across shared services, trigger latent defects, or send malformed input to systems serving user requests. In this paper, we show how production-connected experimentation can operate reliably in a large-scale recommendation serving system. To contain downstream effects without sacrificing realistic dependency behavior, the platform uses three complementary guardrails. Isolated tiers redirect replay traffic away from shared dependencies where replication is practical. Dependency monitors observe downstream health and experiment-attributed errors and terminate experiments after sustained violations. Traffic pinning limits experimental calls to a designated subset of downstream workers when full replication would require scarce capacity. Isolated ranking tiers process billions of replayed requests per day using under 1% of the corresponding serving capacity. Over 90 days, these tiers experienced more than 200,000 abnormal worker exits without directly affecting production-serving workers. During a separate three-month window, dependency monitors cancelled approximately 5% of experiments for the measured ranking service and accounted for 87% of its cancellations. Dependency-aware triggering also reduced code-review experiment executions by 25%. These results show that high-fidelity, production-connected experimentation can operate at scale when downstream effects are isolated where possible, bounded where necessary, and continuously monitored and attributed.

作者备注:14 pages, 8 figures

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-11 11:15 · 最新观测版本

FIRE: Failure Isolation and Reliability for Production-Connected Experiments at Scale

Pre-production changes are usually tested in isolated environments to prevent their side effects from reaching production. Some record-and-replay platforms allow a production-connected mode: candidate changes receive recorded production requests while selected downstream calls reach production dependencies. This improves fidelity before deployment, but it also introduces reliability risks. At hyperscale, experimental traffic can fan out across shared services, trigger latent defects, or send malformed input to systems serving user requests. In this paper, we show how production-connected experimentation can operate reliably in a large-scale recommendation serving system. To contain downstream effects without sacrificing realistic dependency behavior, the platform uses three complementary guardrails. Isolated tiers redirect replay traffic away from shared dependencies where replication is practical. Dependency monitors observe downstream health and experiment-attributed errors and terminate experiments after sustained violations. Traffic pinning limits experimental calls to a designated subset of downstream workers when full replication would require scarce capacity. Isolated ranking tiers process billions of replayed requests per day using under 1% of the corresponding serving capacity. Over 90 days, these tiers experienced more than 200,000 abnormal worker exits without directly affecting production-serving workers. During a separate three-month window, dependency monitors cancelled approximately 5% of experiments for the measured ranking service and accounted for 87% of its cancellations. Dependency-aware triggering also reduced code-review experiment executions by 25%. These results show that high-fidelity, production-connected experimentation can operate at scale when downstream effects are isolated where possible, bounded where necessary, and continuously monitored and attributed.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗