跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.15032 · v1

Instruction-Aware Transfer of GPU Implementation Crossovers: a Tensor-Product Discontinuous Galerkin Operator on GB200, H100, and A100

首次提交 2026-11-11 12:50
版本更新 2026-11-11 12:50
雷达观测 2026-11-13 10:09
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

We compare up to six implementations of an FP64 tensor-product discontinuous Galerkin operator at p = 7-1023 on GB200, H100, and A100 with fixed numerics, input, and code. The fastest path is machine dependent: at p = 511, a fused-epilogue GEMM path is 5.0% faster than a fused Tensor Core kernel on GB200 and 6.9% slower on A100. Nominal-peak scaling reproduces the A100 ranking but fails on H100, where the cost of FP64 arithmetic in the profiler-defined FP64 budget depends on the instruction. We therefore price each issued instruction at its architecture-dependent cost in that budget, using a calibration-side counter profile and one derived calibration factor per kernel, with no fit to the target. A retrospective leave-one-GPU-out evaluation, holding out target timings and counters but not the model form, transfers the p >= 511 path times with 1.9% median error at the common MMA shape, and the direction of the crossover at the H100 shape. Restricting the streaming multiprocessors of one A100, with nothing fitted, reproduces the A100-to-GB200 reversal. At roduction-relevant orders the model does not resolve the fastest fused path; the result identifies the crossover mechanism.

作者备注:35 pages, 6 figures. Includes supplementary material. Submitted to The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-11 12:50 · 最新观测版本

Instruction-Aware Transfer of GPU Implementation Crossovers: a Tensor-Product Discontinuous Galerkin Operator on GB200, H100, and A100

We compare up to six implementations of an FP64 tensor-product discontinuous Galerkin operator at p = 7-1023 on GB200, H100, and A100 with fixed numerics, input, and code. The fastest path is machine dependent: at p = 511, a fused-epilogue GEMM path is 5.0% faster than a fused Tensor Core kernel on GB200 and 6.9% slower on A100. Nominal-peak scaling reproduces the A100 ranking but fails on H100, where the cost of FP64 arithmetic in the profiler-defined FP64 budget depends on the instruction. We therefore price each issued instruction at its architecture-dependent cost in that budget, using a calibration-side counter profile and one derived calibration factor per kernel, with no fit to the target. A retrospective leave-one-GPU-out evaluation, holding out target timings and counters but not the model form, transfers the p >= 511 path times with 1.9% median error at the common MMA shape, and the direction of the crossover at the H100 shape. Restricting the streaming multiprocessors of one A100, with nothing fitted, reproduces the A100-to-GB200 reversal. At roduction-relevant orders the model does not resolve the fastest fused path; the result identifies the crossover mechanism.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗