跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.15069 · v1

DiFiT: Distribution-Fidelity-guided Visual Token Pruning for Multimodal Large Language Models

首次提交 2026-11-11 13:37
版本更新 2026-11-11 13:37
雷达观测 2026-11-13 11:11
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Visual token pruning reduces the inference cost of multimodal large language models, but answer accuracy only partly reflects its effect. Pruning can change the probabilities of alternative response tokens even when greedy answers remain correct and unchanged. We compare full and pruned response distributions under shared reference prefixes. Average predictive drift grows with compression on fixed correctly answered samples. Separate analyses associate larger drift with more confidence-decision disagreements and sampling failures. We propose DiFiT (Distribution-Fidelity-guided Token pruning) to learn discrete selection from reference answers and full-token response distributions. Dual-View Distillation matches probabilities across the vocabulary, while answer supervision supports task quality. A learned scorer and differentiable Top-KK learn which visual evidence to retain. A multi-budget mask objective supports different retention ratios through one shared ranking over a frozen model. On Qwen2.5-VL-7B, DiFiT reduces sampling-induced negative flips by 30.3% relative to FastV at 10% retention on four-task greedy-correct controls. It preserves 98.74% of baseline performance on MME at 30% retention.

作者备注:8 figures, 13 tables

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-11 13:37 · 最新观测版本

DiFiT: Distribution-Fidelity-guided Visual Token Pruning for Multimodal Large Language Models

Visual token pruning reduces the inference cost of multimodal large language models, but answer accuracy only partly reflects its effect. Pruning can change the probabilities of alternative response tokens even when greedy answers remain correct and unchanged. We compare full and pruned response distributions under shared reference prefixes. Average predictive drift grows with compression on fixed correctly answered samples. Separate analyses associate larger drift with more confidence-decision disagreements and sampling failures. We propose DiFiT (Distribution-Fidelity-guided Token pruning) to learn discrete selection from reference answers and full-token response distributions. Dual-View Distillation matches probabilities across the vocabulary, while answer supervision supports task quality. A learned scorer and differentiable Top-KK learn which visual evidence to retain. A multi-budget mask objective supports different retention ratios through one shared ranking over a frozen model. On Qwen2.5-VL-7B, DiFiT reduces sampling-induced negative flips by 30.3% relative to FastV at 10% retention on four-task greedy-correct controls. It preserves 98.74% of baseline performance on MME at 30% retention.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗