跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.15234 · v1

Schedule-Calibrated Commitment Order in Blockwise Masked Diffusion Language Models

首次提交 2026-11-11 17:27
版本更新 2026-11-11 17:27
雷达观测 2026-11-13 11:11
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Sequential block schedules can make token commitment in masked diffusion language models appear strongly left-to-right even when within-block order is random or reversed. For equal contiguous blocks processed without interleaving in positional order, with untied irreversible commitments, we use a Spearman-rank identity to express global position-commitment correlation as a deterministic schedule reference plus a weighted mean within-block correlation. In a reported paired study of LLaDA-8B-Instruct on 500 math and code prompts with 256 generated positions and updates, increasing block size from 64 to 128 lowers mean global correlation from 0.9845 to 0.9149. Uniform-random within-block references are already 0.9375 and 0.7500. After calibration, mean within-block correlations are 0.751 and 0.660, so the larger raw residual at block size 128 does not indicate stronger local positional ordering. We give sharp bounds and derive calibrated intervals from reported summaries, while documenting the limitations of the aggregate-only empirical release. The analysis supports schedule-aware interpretation of commitment order; its empirical scope is one checkpoint and two schedules, without evaluation of output quality or inference speed.

作者备注:9 pages, 1 figure, 2 tables. Includes appendices and ancillary code for algebraic verification

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-11 17:27 · 最新观测版本

Schedule-Calibrated Commitment Order in Blockwise Masked Diffusion Language Models

Sequential block schedules can make token commitment in masked diffusion language models appear strongly left-to-right even when within-block order is random or reversed. For equal contiguous blocks processed without interleaving in positional order, with untied irreversible commitments, we use a Spearman-rank identity to express global position-commitment correlation as a deterministic schedule reference plus a weighted mean within-block correlation. In a reported paired study of LLaDA-8B-Instruct on 500 math and code prompts with 256 generated positions and updates, increasing block size from 64 to 128 lowers mean global correlation from 0.9845 to 0.9149. Uniform-random within-block references are already 0.9375 and 0.7500. After calibration, mean within-block correlations are 0.751 and 0.660, so the larger raw residual at block size 128 does not indicate stronger local positional ordering. We give sharp bounds and derive calibrated intervals from reported summaries, while documenting the limitations of the aggregate-only empirical release. The analysis supports schedule-aware interpretation of commitment order; its empirical scope is one checkpoint and two schedules, without evaluation of output quality or inference speed.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗