← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2611.15493 · v1
The Illusion of Diversity: Aligning LLM Exploration via Effective Entropy
首次提交 2026-11-11 21:54
版本更新 2026-11-11 21:54
雷达观测 2026-11-13 11:11
摘要
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards has shifted the alignment paradigm of large language models from subjective preference to objective correctness, yet a fundamental disconnect persists between exploration diversity and reasoning validity. Existing strategies predominantly rely on "blind" entropy metrics, e.g., token-level or global sequence-level entropy, which structurally fail to distinguish between effective reasoning and potential hallucinations. This misalignment creates an illusion of diversity, where high entropy tends to signal chaotic degeneration rather than valuable exploration. To bridge this gap, we introduce Effective Entropy, a validity-aware entropy concept that quantifies diversity exclusively within the valid subspace and systematically filters out the noise of incorrect trajectories. Built on this concept, we instantiate VEPO, a simple Validity-aware Entropy Policy Optimization method that directly incorporates effective entropy into RLVR training. VEPO induces an adaptive attraction dynamic that drives up the probability of under-explored valid trajectories, a mechanism that matches the practical regime of large-scale autoregressive models where sequence probabilities remain extremely small. Experiments on six mathematical reasoning benchmarks with 1.5B and 7B DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen models show consistent aggregate accuracy gains over GRPO and competitive repeated-sampling success. A direct evaluation with matched correct counts finds more distinct strategies on commonly solved MATH500 problems, supported by paired statistical tests and three-seed training comparisons.
作者备注：Accepted at NeurIPS 2026
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v1 · 2026-11-11 21:54 · 最新观测版本
The Illusion of Diversity: Aligning LLM Exploration via Effective Entropy
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards has shifted the alignment paradigm of large language models from subjective preference to objective correctness, yet a fundamental disconnect persists between exploration diversity and reasoning validity. Existing strategies predominantly rely on "blind" entropy metrics, e.g., token-level or global sequence-level entropy, which structurally fail to distinguish between effective reasoning and potential hallucinations. This misalignment creates an illusion of diversity, where high entropy tends to signal chaotic degeneration rather than valuable exploration. To bridge this gap, we introduce Effective Entropy, a validity-aware entropy concept that quantifies diversity exclusively within the valid subspace and systematically filters out the noise of incorrect trajectories. Built on this concept, we instantiate VEPO, a simple Validity-aware Entropy Policy Optimization method that directly incorporates effective entropy into RLVR training. VEPO induces an adaptive attraction dynamic that drives up the probability of under-explored valid trajectories, a mechanism that matches the practical regime of large-scale autoregressive models where sequence probabilities remain extremely small. Experiments on six mathematical reasoning benchmarks with 1.5B and 7B DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen models show consistent aggregate accuracy gains over GRPO and competitive repeated-sampling success. A direct evaluation with matched correct counts finds more distinct strategies on commonly solved MATH500 problems, supported by paired statistical tests and three-seed training comparisons.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗