跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.15555 · v1

What Conformal Selection Can Certify in CRISPR Off-Target Design:Benchmark Leakage, Free Baselines, and a Finite-Sample Cohort Requirement

首次提交 2026-11-11 22:39
版本更新 2026-11-11 22:39
雷达观测 2026-11-13 11:11
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Conformal selection promises distribution-free, finite-sample control of the error rate of a decision, and has been proposed as a safety layer for machine-learning CRISPR guide design. We ask whether such a certificate is attainable from the validated off-target data that exist. The constraint is arithmetic: a conformal p-value cannot fall below one divided by the calibration cohort size plus one, so a Benjamini-Hochberg selection certifies a single candidate only when that cohort is at least the candidate pool size divided by the tolerated error rate. Public cohorts supply ten validated guides, whereas a pool of two thousand at a ten percent error rate needs twenty thousand; the accepted set is consequently empty in over ninety-six percent of splits. Two benchmarking findings explain why this went unnoticed. The standard CIRCLE-seq file lists ten guides under eighty on-target strings, so grouping cross-validation on the sequence column trains and tests on one guide; corrected, pair-level discrimination and per-guide fidelity collapse. With that leakage removed, a training-free position-weight score and a bare count of near-match genomic sites are not beaten by a trained oracle. We give the corrected protocol, the baselines a new model must beat, and the cohort size a certified pipeline needs.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-11 22:39 · 最新观测版本

What Conformal Selection Can Certify in CRISPR Off-Target Design:Benchmark Leakage, Free Baselines, and a Finite-Sample Cohort Requirement

Conformal selection promises distribution-free, finite-sample control of the error rate of a decision, and has been proposed as a safety layer for machine-learning CRISPR guide design. We ask whether such a certificate is attainable from the validated off-target data that exist. The constraint is arithmetic: a conformal p-value cannot fall below one divided by the calibration cohort size plus one, so a Benjamini-Hochberg selection certifies a single candidate only when that cohort is at least the candidate pool size divided by the tolerated error rate. Public cohorts supply ten validated guides, whereas a pool of two thousand at a ten percent error rate needs twenty thousand; the accepted set is consequently empty in over ninety-six percent of splits. Two benchmarking findings explain why this went unnoticed. The standard CIRCLE-seq file lists ten guides under eighty on-target strings, so grouping cross-validation on the sequence column trains and tests on one guide; corrected, pair-level discrimination and per-guide fidelity collapse. With that leakage removed, a training-free position-weight score and a bare count of near-match genomic sites are not beaten by a trained oracle. We give the corrected protocol, the baselines a new model must beat, and the cohort size a certified pipeline needs.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗