跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.15578 · v1

Constructing and Validating Memorisation Audits for EHR Foundation Models

首次提交 2026-11-11 23:02
版本更新 2026-11-11 23:02
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Autoregressive electronic health record (EHR) foundation models may disclose training information at inference, yet clinical predictability makes patient-specific memorisation difficult to distinguish from generalisation. We evaluate fixed-window token reconstruction, sensitive-attribute disclosure, and random patient-level canaries in GPT-2-style models trained on MIMIC-IV, across early, best-validation, and final checkpoints. Reconstruction improves with additional context, but training--held-out differences remain small. Trajectory-unique prompts containing limited clinical information produce no excess sensitive disclosure for training patients. In a matched model with random binary patient-level canaries, training-patient label-recovery AUROC increases from 0.512 to 0.549 while held-out recovery remains at chance. An overfit 1,000-patient positive control achieves near-perfect recovery, confirming sensitivity to strong memorisation. These results reveal weak cohort-level memorisation but no reliable patient-level disclosure under the evaluated attacks. They motivate clinically grounded inference-time audits that can detect patient-specific memorisation in existing models without retraining with canaries.

作者备注:Accepted to the NeurIPS 2026 Workshop on Beyond Private Training: The New Landscape of AI Privacy (InfPriv) and the Machine Learning for Health (ML4H) 2026 Symposium, Findings Track

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-11 23:02 · 最新观测版本

Constructing and Validating Memorisation Audits for EHR Foundation Models

Autoregressive electronic health record (EHR) foundation models may disclose training information at inference, yet clinical predictability makes patient-specific memorisation difficult to distinguish from generalisation. We evaluate fixed-window token reconstruction, sensitive-attribute disclosure, and random patient-level canaries in GPT-2-style models trained on MIMIC-IV, across early, best-validation, and final checkpoints. Reconstruction improves with additional context, but training--held-out differences remain small. Trajectory-unique prompts containing limited clinical information produce no excess sensitive disclosure for training patients. In a matched model with random binary patient-level canaries, training-patient label-recovery AUROC increases from 0.512 to 0.549 while held-out recovery remains at chance. An overfit 1,000-patient positive control achieves near-perfect recovery, confirming sensitivity to strong memorisation. These results reveal weak cohort-level memorisation but no reliable patient-level disclosure under the evaluated attacks. They motivate clinically grounded inference-time audits that can detect patient-specific memorisation in existing models without retraining with canaries.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗