跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.15607 · v1

FADO: Learning Causal Explanations with Prior-Fitted Networks

首次提交 2026-11-11 23:26
版本更新 2026-11-11 23:26
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

In regression and classification tasks with tabular datasets, most of the literature on explanation in ML (e.g. SHAP, permutation importance) has focused on predictive attribution: does feature XiX_i help predict outcome YY? At its heart, predictive attribution captures correlation, not causation. We instead ask a causal question: would manipulating feature XiX_i change outcome YY? We define a natural quantity to answer this question, the feature intervention effect: Δi=E[Y∣do(Xi=+1)]−E[Y∣do(Xi=−1)]Δ_i = E[Y\mid do(X_i=+1)]-E[Y\mid do(X_i=-1)]. In general, estimating this quantity from observational data alone would entail strong causal assumptions. We propose FADO (Feature-wise Amortized Do-Operators), an amortized inference method using prior-fitted networks trained on synthetic tabular datasets generated by structural causal models. During training, the synthetic data-generating process is known, so we can compute ground-truth intervention effects ΔiΔ_i, and train a model to predict them at test time from a purely observational tabular dataset. As we demonstrate through extensive experiments, our new causal explainability method is easy to train and provides better explanations under a range of settings for which standard predictive attribution fails, including proxy variables, confounders, colliders, and placebos. We evaluate it on real, synthetic and semi-synthetic datasets, with and without hidden confounders, and compare it to existing predictive attribution methods and state-of-the-art causal inference methods.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-11 23:26 · 最新观测版本

FADO: Learning Causal Explanations with Prior-Fitted Networks

In regression and classification tasks with tabular datasets, most of the literature on explanation in ML (e.g. SHAP, permutation importance) has focused on predictive attribution: does feature XiX_i help predict outcome YY? At its heart, predictive attribution captures correlation, not causation. We instead ask a causal question: would manipulating feature XiX_i change outcome YY? We define a natural quantity to answer this question, the feature intervention effect: Δi=E[Y∣do(Xi=+1)]−E[Y∣do(Xi=−1)]Δ_i = E[Y\mid do(X_i=+1)]-E[Y\mid do(X_i=-1)]. In general, estimating this quantity from observational data alone would entail strong causal assumptions. We propose FADO (Feature-wise Amortized Do-Operators), an amortized inference method using prior-fitted networks trained on synthetic tabular datasets generated by structural causal models. During training, the synthetic data-generating process is known, so we can compute ground-truth intervention effects ΔiΔ_i, and train a model to predict them at test time from a purely observational tabular dataset. As we demonstrate through extensive experiments, our new causal explainability method is easy to train and provides better explanations under a range of settings for which standard predictive attribution fails, including proxy variables, confounders, colliders, and placebos. We evaluate it on real, synthetic and semi-synthetic datasets, with and without hidden confounders, and compare it to existing predictive attribution methods and state-of-the-art causal inference methods.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗