← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2611.15607 · v1
FADO: Learning Causal Explanations with Prior-Fitted Networks
首次提交 2026-11-11 23:26
版本更新 2026-11-11 23:26
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:16
摘要
In regression and classification tasks with tabular datasets, most of the literature on explanation in ML (e.g. SHAP, permutation importance) has focused on predictive attribution: does feature help predict outcome ? At its heart, predictive attribution captures correlation, not causation. We instead ask a causal question: would manipulating feature change outcome ? We define a natural quantity to answer this question, the feature intervention effect: . In general, estimating this quantity from observational data alone would entail strong causal assumptions. We propose FADO (Feature-wise Amortized Do-Operators), an amortized inference method using prior-fitted networks trained on synthetic tabular datasets generated by structural causal models. During training, the synthetic data-generating process is known, so we can compute ground-truth intervention effects , and train a model to predict them at test time from a purely observational tabular dataset. As we demonstrate through extensive experiments, our new causal explainability method is easy to train and provides better explanations under a range of settings for which standard predictive attribution fails, including proxy variables, confounders, colliders, and placebos. We evaluate it on real, synthetic and semi-synthetic datasets, with and without hidden confounders, and compare it to existing predictive attribution methods and state-of-the-art causal inference methods.
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v1 · 2026-11-11 23:26 · 最新观测版本
FADO: Learning Causal Explanations with Prior-Fitted Networks
In regression and classification tasks with tabular datasets, most of the literature on explanation in ML (e.g. SHAP, permutation importance) has focused on predictive attribution: does feature help predict outcome ? At its heart, predictive attribution captures correlation, not causation. We instead ask a causal question: would manipulating feature change outcome ? We define a natural quantity to answer this question, the feature intervention effect: . In general, estimating this quantity from observational data alone would entail strong causal assumptions. We propose FADO (Feature-wise Amortized Do-Operators), an amortized inference method using prior-fitted networks trained on synthetic tabular datasets generated by structural causal models. During training, the synthetic data-generating process is known, so we can compute ground-truth intervention effects , and train a model to predict them at test time from a purely observational tabular dataset. As we demonstrate through extensive experiments, our new causal explainability method is easy to train and provides better explanations under a range of settings for which standard predictive attribution fails, including proxy variables, confounders, colliders, and placebos. We evaluate it on real, synthetic and semi-synthetic datasets, with and without hidden confounders, and compare it to existing predictive attribution methods and state-of-the-art causal inference methods.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗