跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.15655 · v1

Can Agents Relive Past Experiences? Diagnosing Event-Affect Decoupling in Affective-Episodic Retrospection

首次提交 2026-11-12 00:04
版本更新 2026-11-12 00:04
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

As memory-augmented agents increasingly support long-term and personalized interactions, reliable recall of emotional experiences while preserving their associated affect becomes necessary. However, existing evaluations usually assess emotion accuracy and factual memory grounding separately, overlooking event-affect correspondence. In this work, we formulate Affective-Episodic Retrospection (AER) as a task that explicitly evaluates the recovery of past events, associated affects, and their correspondence, and define Event-Affect Decoupling as a failure mode where the correct emotion is recalled but associated with the wrong episode. To diagnose Event-Affect Decoupling, we propose EM-TRACE, a stage-wise framework that decomposes AER into retrieval, affect recovery, and realization. On a controlled GoEmotions-based benchmark, Emotion-only retrieval achieves 28.65% affect recovery but retrieves the target episode for only 4.44% of queries, yielding a UAR of 24.21%. Further analysis reveals that event retrieval and affect assignment introduce distinct binding failures. These findings show that reliable AER requires grounded recall of emotional experiences, where episode retrieval, affect recovery, event-affect binding, and generation quality should be evaluated jointly. Our code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/A412/.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-12 00:04 · 最新观测版本

Can Agents Relive Past Experiences? Diagnosing Event-Affect Decoupling in Affective-Episodic Retrospection

As memory-augmented agents increasingly support long-term and personalized interactions, reliable recall of emotional experiences while preserving their associated affect becomes necessary. However, existing evaluations usually assess emotion accuracy and factual memory grounding separately, overlooking event-affect correspondence. In this work, we formulate Affective-Episodic Retrospection (AER) as a task that explicitly evaluates the recovery of past events, associated affects, and their correspondence, and define Event-Affect Decoupling as a failure mode where the correct emotion is recalled but associated with the wrong episode. To diagnose Event-Affect Decoupling, we propose EM-TRACE, a stage-wise framework that decomposes AER into retrieval, affect recovery, and realization. On a controlled GoEmotions-based benchmark, Emotion-only retrieval achieves 28.65% affect recovery but retrieves the target episode for only 4.44% of queries, yielding a UAR of 24.21%. Further analysis reveals that event retrieval and affect assignment introduce distinct binding failures. These findings show that reliable AER requires grounded recall of emotional experiences, where episode retrieval, affect recovery, event-affect binding, and generation quality should be evaluated jointly. Our code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/A412/.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗