跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.15718 · v1

Orbit: An Evidence-Grounded Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on IT Operations Reasoning

首次提交 2026-11-12 00:57
版本更新 2026-11-12 00:57
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

LLMs now support IT operations (ITOps), but benchmarks rarely show why a model fails. We present ORBIT, a benchmark of ITOps questions in three formats, namely multiple-choice, open-ended, and troubleshooting, with each question accompanied by a reference answer and a recorded source. An audit found template defects in about a tenth of the generated items, so we drop them and rebuild the troubleshooting format from real practitioner threads with accepted answers. Under one independent judge, five LLMs answer most multiple-choice items correctly, between a third and just over half of the open-ended items, and a minority of the troubleshooting items, even under a more lenient root-cause rubric. When models judged their own answers, they accepted many answers to defective items, so we use one independent judge for every model. Word overlap with the question finds the correct option for more than half of the multiple-choice items. ORBIT is a diagnostic aid for selecting and supervising assistants rather than a deployment test.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-12 00:57 · 最新观测版本

Orbit: An Evidence-Grounded Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on IT Operations Reasoning

LLMs now support IT operations (ITOps), but benchmarks rarely show why a model fails. We present ORBIT, a benchmark of ITOps questions in three formats, namely multiple-choice, open-ended, and troubleshooting, with each question accompanied by a reference answer and a recorded source. An audit found template defects in about a tenth of the generated items, so we drop them and rebuild the troubleshooting format from real practitioner threads with accepted answers. Under one independent judge, five LLMs answer most multiple-choice items correctly, between a third and just over half of the open-ended items, and a minority of the troubleshooting items, even under a more lenient root-cause rubric. When models judged their own answers, they accepted many answers to defective items, so we use one independent judge for every model. Word overlap with the question finds the correct option for more than half of the multiple-choice items. ORBIT is a diagnostic aid for selecting and supervising assistants rather than a deployment test.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗