跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.15735 · v1

Where Is Uncertainty Observed? A Mechanistic Understanding of Uncertainty Quantification in LLMs

首次提交 2026-11-12 01:14
版本更新 2026-11-12 01:14
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Knowing when a large language model's (LLM's) response can be trusted is critical for its safe use. Uncertainty quantification (UQ) can help LLMs recognize if their responses may be unreliable. Existing taxonomies organize UQ methods by uncertainty source or estimation mechanism. They leave unresolved the question of where uncertainty is observed in the model's computation. The answer matters because the observation point determines whether an estimator has access to enough information to recover a given target, and how well it can recover it. Drawing on mechanistic interpretability, we define four mechanistic observation lenses: the structural lens observes component updates, the representational lens observes hidden states, the distributional lens observes token probabilities, and the semantical lens observes distributions over meanings. We relate these lenses through the residual stream and order them by the information they carry, which gives a principle for selecting UQ methods for different targets. We survey existing methods through the four lenses. Furthermore, we distinguish evaluation targets, criteria, and metrics to clarify different UQ evaluation protocols. Finally, we identify open problems and research directions to connect uncertainty estimation to the internal computation and downstream use of LLMs.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-12 01:14 · 最新观测版本

Where Is Uncertainty Observed? A Mechanistic Understanding of Uncertainty Quantification in LLMs

Knowing when a large language model's (LLM's) response can be trusted is critical for its safe use. Uncertainty quantification (UQ) can help LLMs recognize if their responses may be unreliable. Existing taxonomies organize UQ methods by uncertainty source or estimation mechanism. They leave unresolved the question of where uncertainty is observed in the model's computation. The answer matters because the observation point determines whether an estimator has access to enough information to recover a given target, and how well it can recover it. Drawing on mechanistic interpretability, we define four mechanistic observation lenses: the structural lens observes component updates, the representational lens observes hidden states, the distributional lens observes token probabilities, and the semantical lens observes distributions over meanings. We relate these lenses through the residual stream and order them by the information they carry, which gives a principle for selecting UQ methods for different targets. We survey existing methods through the four lenses. Furthermore, we distinguish evaluation targets, criteria, and metrics to clarify different UQ evaluation protocols. Finally, we identify open problems and research directions to connect uncertainty estimation to the internal computation and downstream use of LLMs.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗