跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.15945 · v1

Reinforcement Learning for Inventory Control under Regime-Switching Demand: A Controlled Comparison of LSTM, MLP, and (s,S) Policies

首次提交 2026-11-12 03:40
版本更新 2026-11-12 03:40
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Classical inventory policies such as (s,S) are provably optimal under stationary demand but cannot adapt when demand switches between hidden regimes, and memoryless deep reinforcement learning policies, confined to a fixed observation window, cannot maintain a belief over latent demand structure. We ask whether a recurrent policy offers a measurable advantage over both a memoryless policy and a classical baseline under regime-switching demand, and how that advantage scales with supply-chain lead time. We build a custom Gymnasium environment in which daily demand is generated by a two-state hidden Markov process with Poisson emissions, so that the regime is known at evaluation time but hidden from the agent. An optimised (s,S) heuristic, an MLP PPO agent, and an LSTM Recurrent PPO agent are trained under matched compute and evaluated at lead times of 0, 3, 6, and 10 days over 30 deterministic episodes each. The recurrent policy outperforms both alternatives at every lead time, and its margin over the MLP widens monotonically with lead time, from parity at lead time 0 to 2.17×\times at lead time 10. Principal component analysis of the LSTM hidden state explains the widening gap: the representation shifts from encoding a binary regime indicator at short lead times to encoding multi-step pipeline state at long lead times. Recurrent memory becomes the decisive architectural factor as the credit-assignment horizon lengthens.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-12 03:40 · 最新观测版本

Reinforcement Learning for Inventory Control under Regime-Switching Demand: A Controlled Comparison of LSTM, MLP, and (s,S) Policies

Classical inventory policies such as (s,S) are provably optimal under stationary demand but cannot adapt when demand switches between hidden regimes, and memoryless deep reinforcement learning policies, confined to a fixed observation window, cannot maintain a belief over latent demand structure. We ask whether a recurrent policy offers a measurable advantage over both a memoryless policy and a classical baseline under regime-switching demand, and how that advantage scales with supply-chain lead time. We build a custom Gymnasium environment in which daily demand is generated by a two-state hidden Markov process with Poisson emissions, so that the regime is known at evaluation time but hidden from the agent. An optimised (s,S) heuristic, an MLP PPO agent, and an LSTM Recurrent PPO agent are trained under matched compute and evaluated at lead times of 0, 3, 6, and 10 days over 30 deterministic episodes each. The recurrent policy outperforms both alternatives at every lead time, and its margin over the MLP widens monotonically with lead time, from parity at lead time 0 to 2.17×\times at lead time 10. Principal component analysis of the LSTM hidden state explains the widening gap: the representation shifts from encoding a binary regime indicator at short lead times to encoding multi-step pipeline state at long lead times. Recurrent memory becomes the decisive architectural factor as the credit-assignment horizon lengthens.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗