跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.15971 · v1

Better Boundary Prediction Does Not Guarantee Better Structural Representation

首次提交 2026-11-12 04:15
版本更新 2026-11-12 04:15
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Punctuation marks often mark phrase boundaries, carrying linguistic information. Therefore, punctuation marks' abundance and feasibility as proxies of linguistic structure has led to suggestions that using punctuation marks to optimise on phrasal structure may help language models (LMs) improve their representations of argument, semantic, and syntactic structures. In this paper, we test the above claim in English across three primary LM architectures: decoder-only, encoder-only, and encoder-decoder LMs, by complementing traditional token prediction with punctuation restoration (PR). Our evidence, collected at the <1B parameter scale, suggests that optimising for boundary prediction does not necessarily guarantee higher-quality structural representation in decoder-only, encoder-decoder, and encoder-only LMs, failing to improve performance on downstream tasks that require understanding structure in linguistic input.

作者备注:Presented at LP4FM @ NeurIPS 2026

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-12 04:15 · 最新观测版本

Better Boundary Prediction Does Not Guarantee Better Structural Representation

Punctuation marks often mark phrase boundaries, carrying linguistic information. Therefore, punctuation marks' abundance and feasibility as proxies of linguistic structure has led to suggestions that using punctuation marks to optimise on phrasal structure may help language models (LMs) improve their representations of argument, semantic, and syntactic structures. In this paper, we test the above claim in English across three primary LM architectures: decoder-only, encoder-only, and encoder-decoder LMs, by complementing traditional token prediction with punctuation restoration (PR). Our evidence, collected at the <1B parameter scale, suggests that optimising for boundary prediction does not necessarily guarantee higher-quality structural representation in decoder-only, encoder-decoder, and encoder-only LMs, failing to improve performance on downstream tasks that require understanding structure in linguistic input.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗