跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.16097 · v1

A Matching Lower Bound for Online Smooth Calibration

首次提交 2026-11-12 07:13
版本更新 2026-11-12 07:13
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

We study smooth calibration error in sequential binary prediction, which measures how far a sequence of probabilistic forecasts is from being calibrated and, unlike the classical expected calibration error, is robust to small perturbations of the forecasts. Against adaptive adversaries, the minimax smooth calibration error is known to lie between $Ω(T^{1/3})$ and $O(\sqrt{T})$ (Qiao and Zheng, 2024), where $T$ is the number of rounds. In this paper, we close this gap by constructing a new adversary whose outcome mean moves with the forecaster's cumulative residual. This design makes compensating for past residuals costly, and forces every forecaster to incur an expected smooth calibration error of $Ω(\sqrt{T})$. This lower bound matches the known upper bound up to universal constants, and further implies $Ω(\sqrt{T})$ lower bounds for calibration distance and lower calibration distance. Overall, our results settle the minimax rates of these calibration measures in sequential prediction. The proof ideas are partially developed by GPT-6 Astra under the authors' guidance.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-12 07:13 · 最新观测版本

A Matching Lower Bound for Online Smooth Calibration

We study smooth calibration error in sequential binary prediction, which measures how far a sequence of probabilistic forecasts is from being calibrated and, unlike the classical expected calibration error, is robust to small perturbations of the forecasts. Against adaptive adversaries, the minimax smooth calibration error is known to lie between $Ω(T^{1/3})$ and $O(\sqrt{T})$ (Qiao and Zheng, 2024), where $T$ is the number of rounds. In this paper, we close this gap by constructing a new adversary whose outcome mean moves with the forecaster's cumulative residual. This design makes compensating for past residuals costly, and forces every forecaster to incur an expected smooth calibration error of $Ω(\sqrt{T})$. This lower bound matches the known upper bound up to universal constants, and further implies $Ω(\sqrt{T})$ lower bounds for calibration distance and lower calibration distance. Overall, our results settle the minimax rates of these calibration measures in sequential prediction. The proof ideas are partially developed by GPT-6 Astra under the authors' guidance.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗