跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.16138 · v1

Individually Fair Facility Location

首次提交 2026-11-12 09:02
版本更新 2026-11-12 09:02
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

We study individually fair facility location, where each client must connect to an open facility within a prescribed radius and the objective is to minimize total opening and connection cost. We show that preserving the radii changes the approximability of metric facility location fundamentally. For every fixed radius violation below three, no deterministic polynomial-time algorithm achieves a sublogarithmic cost factor unless $\mathrm{P}=\mathrm{NP}$. The hardness holds with uniform opening costs and uniform radii. It contradicts the strict-fairness constant-factor guarantee recently claimed by Liu, Xu, and Zhang [Theory of Computing Systems, Vol. 70 (2026)]. We then establish a positive result for arbitrary client radii. We give a randomized polynomial-time algorithm that has cost at most $1.725$ times the strictly fair optimum and serves every client within three times its fair radius (in the Appendix we show how this can be de-randomized). We use the approach of Byrka, Srinivasan and Swamy [IPCO 2010]. The facility-location radius factor three is therefore optimal among deterministic polynomial-time algorithms with constant cost factor, unless $\mathrm{P}=\mathrm{NP}$. Experiments on real-world data indicate that the worst case radius bound is rarely realized in practice: the algorithm serves over 99.8% of clients within their stated radius, and never beyond 1.5 times it. Our code is available at https://github.com/milindmaiti/IFFL_Implementation.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-12 09:02 · 最新观测版本

Individually Fair Facility Location

We study individually fair facility location, where each client must connect to an open facility within a prescribed radius and the objective is to minimize total opening and connection cost. We show that preserving the radii changes the approximability of metric facility location fundamentally. For every fixed radius violation below three, no deterministic polynomial-time algorithm achieves a sublogarithmic cost factor unless $\mathrm{P}=\mathrm{NP}$. The hardness holds with uniform opening costs and uniform radii. It contradicts the strict-fairness constant-factor guarantee recently claimed by Liu, Xu, and Zhang [Theory of Computing Systems, Vol. 70 (2026)]. We then establish a positive result for arbitrary client radii. We give a randomized polynomial-time algorithm that has cost at most $1.725$ times the strictly fair optimum and serves every client within three times its fair radius (in the Appendix we show how this can be de-randomized). We use the approach of Byrka, Srinivasan and Swamy [IPCO 2010]. The facility-location radius factor three is therefore optimal among deterministic polynomial-time algorithms with constant cost factor, unless $\mathrm{P}=\mathrm{NP}$. Experiments on real-world data indicate that the worst case radius bound is rarely realized in practice: the algorithm serves over 99.8% of clients within their stated radius, and never beyond 1.5 times it. Our code is available at https://github.com/milindmaiti/IFFL_Implementation.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗