跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.16313 · v1

Optimal-Size Strong Connectivity Preservers under Two Edge Failures in Subcubic Time

首次提交 2026-11-12 13:18
版本更新 2026-11-12 13:18
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

A kk-edge-failure strong connectivity preserver of a directed graph on NN vertices is a spanning subgraph that has the same strongly connected components as the input after each set of at most kk edge deletions. The lower-bound construction of Baswana, Choudhary, and Roditty [BCR18], adapted to strong connectivity in [CC20], gives the previous best bound of Ω(2kN)Ω(2^kN) necessary edges. Hoppenworth, Saranurak, and Wang [HSW25] prove an O(k4kNlog⁡N)O(k4^kN\log N) upper bound, leaving a logarithmic gap for fixed kk. We close this gap by giving an explicit strongly connected graph on N=2dN=2^d vertices with N−1+(N/2)log⁡2NN-1+(N/2)\log_2N edges, every one of which is necessary in a two-failure preserver. Together with the upper bound of [HSW25], this proves that the optimal size in the worst case is Θk(Nlog⁡N)Θ_k(N\log N) for every fixed k≥2k\geq2, whereas it is Θ(N)Θ(N) for k=1k=1 [GIP20]. The same graph has a one-failure preserver with at most 3(N−1)3(N-1) edges. We also give a randomized algorithm that either returns a spanning subgraph or reports failure. For every fixed c,ε>0c,\varepsilon>0, with probability at least 1−N−c1-N^{-c} it returns a correct preserver for k=2k=2 with O(Nlog⁡N)O(N\log N) edges, in O~(N(ω+3)/2+ε)\widetilde O(N^{(ω+3)/2+\varepsilon}) time and O~(N2)\widetilde O(N^2) space. Here ωω is the matrix multiplication exponent over a fixed finite field.

作者备注:43 pages

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-12 13:18 · 最新观测版本

Optimal-Size Strong Connectivity Preservers under Two Edge Failures in Subcubic Time

A kk-edge-failure strong connectivity preserver of a directed graph on NN vertices is a spanning subgraph that has the same strongly connected components as the input after each set of at most kk edge deletions. The lower-bound construction of Baswana, Choudhary, and Roditty [BCR18], adapted to strong connectivity in [CC20], gives the previous best bound of Ω(2kN)Ω(2^kN) necessary edges. Hoppenworth, Saranurak, and Wang [HSW25] prove an O(k4kNlog⁡N)O(k4^kN\log N) upper bound, leaving a logarithmic gap for fixed kk. We close this gap by giving an explicit strongly connected graph on N=2dN=2^d vertices with N−1+(N/2)log⁡2NN-1+(N/2)\log_2N edges, every one of which is necessary in a two-failure preserver. Together with the upper bound of [HSW25], this proves that the optimal size in the worst case is Θk(Nlog⁡N)Θ_k(N\log N) for every fixed k≥2k\geq2, whereas it is Θ(N)Θ(N) for k=1k=1 [GIP20]. The same graph has a one-failure preserver with at most 3(N−1)3(N-1) edges. We also give a randomized algorithm that either returns a spanning subgraph or reports failure. For every fixed c,ε>0c,\varepsilon>0, with probability at least 1−N−c1-N^{-c} it returns a correct preserver for k=2k=2 with O(Nlog⁡N)O(N\log N) edges, in O~(N(ω+3)/2+ε)\widetilde O(N^{(ω+3)/2+\varepsilon}) time and O~(N2)\widetilde O(N^2) space. Here ωω is the matrix multiplication exponent over a fixed finite field.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗