← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2611.16621 · v1
Studies on Sign Language Retrieval in Low-Resource Dictionary Settings
首次提交 2026-11-12 18:57
版本更新 2026-11-12 18:57
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:15
摘要
Most sign languages have no annotated corpus, only small dictionaries with one or a few example videos per sign. This study examines how well a pose encoder trained on a single sign language serves such languages without any target-language training. An encoder trained with metric learning on American Sign Language (ASL-Citizen) is evaluated frozen on six datasets of Turkish, Russian, Indian, Argentinian, Pakistani and Sri Lankan sign languages, with one or four clips per sign enrolled and, where signer identities are available, the query's signer excluded from the gallery. With one enrolled clip, the encoder retrieves the correct sign first in 36.4-80.7 % of queries, against 16.0-69.6 % for the best learning-free method (angle-based dynamic time warping) and a six-target mean of 39.3 % for an ASL-trained OpenHands graph network. In a crossed ablation of the encoder (embedding geometry, aggregation of body and hand embeddings, training objective, and attention between articulators), two choices matter: a per-pair InfoNCE objective outperforms supervised contrastive and cross-entropy training, and blocking attention between body, left hand and right hand inside the encoder raises accuracy by up to 5.1 points. The best configuration reaches 68.0 % one-shot accuracy (59.0 % for the reference encoder). On CISLR, an Indian Sign Language dictionary of 4,765 words with one video per word, the encoders find the correct word first for 17.3-19.0 % of queries, above the 16.8 % of the original RGB baseline. Over eight seeds with the joint encoder, spherical, Euclidean and hyperbolic embedding spaces differ by at most 1.6 points, except the hyperbolic token-attention head trained with InfoNCE, which is 1.4-2.0 points worse, so the geometry is a minor factor.
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v1 · 2026-11-12 18:57 · 最新观测版本
Studies on Sign Language Retrieval in Low-Resource Dictionary Settings
Most sign languages have no annotated corpus, only small dictionaries with one or a few example videos per sign. This study examines how well a pose encoder trained on a single sign language serves such languages without any target-language training. An encoder trained with metric learning on American Sign Language (ASL-Citizen) is evaluated frozen on six datasets of Turkish, Russian, Indian, Argentinian, Pakistani and Sri Lankan sign languages, with one or four clips per sign enrolled and, where signer identities are available, the query's signer excluded from the gallery. With one enrolled clip, the encoder retrieves the correct sign first in 36.4-80.7 % of queries, against 16.0-69.6 % for the best learning-free method (angle-based dynamic time warping) and a six-target mean of 39.3 % for an ASL-trained OpenHands graph network. In a crossed ablation of the encoder (embedding geometry, aggregation of body and hand embeddings, training objective, and attention between articulators), two choices matter: a per-pair InfoNCE objective outperforms supervised contrastive and cross-entropy training, and blocking attention between body, left hand and right hand inside the encoder raises accuracy by up to 5.1 points. The best configuration reaches 68.0 % one-shot accuracy (59.0 % for the reference encoder). On CISLR, an Indian Sign Language dictionary of 4,765 words with one video per word, the encoders find the correct word first for 17.3-19.0 % of queries, above the 16.8 % of the original RGB baseline. Over eight seeds with the joint encoder, spherical, Euclidean and hyperbolic embedding spaces differ by at most 1.6 points, except the hyperbolic token-attention head trained with InfoNCE, which is 1.4-2.0 points worse, so the geometry is a minor factor.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗