跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.16726 · v1

From Data to Wisdom: Rethinking AI Through an Epistemic Lens

首次提交 2026-11-12 20:38
版本更新 2026-11-12 20:38
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:15
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

This paper proposes the Data-to-Wisdom Epistemic Architecture for AI (EAAI), a conceptual framework treating Data, Information, Knowledge, Understanding and Wisdom as five distinct but recursively interacting epistemic functions: observation, contextual interpretation, modeling and prediction, critical evaluation and informed judgment. Two observations motivate it: sequential readings of the Knowledge Pyramid obscure how these functions interact, and a targeted review of ten Bayesian reference books finds that prior distributions are defined mathematically while "prior information" and "prior knowledge" are not consistently distinguished as epistemic categories. A Bayesian interpretation relates the likelihood, prior and posterior distributions, posterior prediction, model checking and decision analysis to the five functions, without limiting EAAI to Bayesian systems. Extending "prior" in an epistemic sense, the paper distinguishes five kinds of prior context that can shape the model, the likelihood, the prior, evaluation and action. Three worked applications -- quantitative financial risk, actuarial modeling in health insurance and agentic AI for medical reimbursement claims -- show how EAAI structures the analysis of model assumptions, evidence interpretation, validation, dependencies and decision consequences, separating the prediction of a risk, the appraisal of its reliability and the justification of action. It draws implications for AI and machine learning, including evaluation by function, treating intermediate model outputs as evidence open to challenge and separating generation from appraisal, and compares EAAI with work on DIKW, Bayesian workflow, AI evaluation and risk governance. Its contributions are an epistemic vocabulary with recursive relationships, a more accessible reading of Bayesian methodology, a typology of prior context and clearer methodological terminology.

作者备注:23 pages, 7 figures, 4 tables

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-12 20:38 · 最新观测版本

From Data to Wisdom: Rethinking AI Through an Epistemic Lens

This paper proposes the Data-to-Wisdom Epistemic Architecture for AI (EAAI), a conceptual framework treating Data, Information, Knowledge, Understanding and Wisdom as five distinct but recursively interacting epistemic functions: observation, contextual interpretation, modeling and prediction, critical evaluation and informed judgment. Two observations motivate it: sequential readings of the Knowledge Pyramid obscure how these functions interact, and a targeted review of ten Bayesian reference books finds that prior distributions are defined mathematically while "prior information" and "prior knowledge" are not consistently distinguished as epistemic categories. A Bayesian interpretation relates the likelihood, prior and posterior distributions, posterior prediction, model checking and decision analysis to the five functions, without limiting EAAI to Bayesian systems. Extending "prior" in an epistemic sense, the paper distinguishes five kinds of prior context that can shape the model, the likelihood, the prior, evaluation and action. Three worked applications -- quantitative financial risk, actuarial modeling in health insurance and agentic AI for medical reimbursement claims -- show how EAAI structures the analysis of model assumptions, evidence interpretation, validation, dependencies and decision consequences, separating the prediction of a risk, the appraisal of its reliability and the justification of action. It draws implications for AI and machine learning, including evaluation by function, treating intermediate model outputs as evidence open to challenge and separating generation from appraisal, and compares EAAI with work on DIKW, Bayesian workflow, AI evaluation and risk governance. Its contributions are an epistemic vocabulary with recursive relationships, a more accessible reading of Bayesian methodology, a typology of prior context and clearer methodological terminology.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗