跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.16736 · v1

On the Difficulty of Sequence-Level Supervised Learning for Autoregressive Language Models

首次提交 2026-11-12 20:51
版本更新 2026-11-12 20:51
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:15
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

During the supervised learning phase, autoregressive language models are typically trained by minimizing the negative log-likelihood of the training data, which decomposes as a sum of token-level cross-entropies via teacher forcing. This objective is simple and efficient but potentially suffers from so-called exposure bias: a mismatch between the way the model is trained and the way it is used at inference time. Can we instead design sequence-level loss functions that incorporate inference-time decoding procedures, such as greedy decoding or autoregressive sampling? We show that two natural attempts lead to loss functions that are fundamentally flawed: unbounded below. We further show that these two flawed loss functions are intimately connected: using autoregressive Gumbel tricks, the sampling based loss is the expected greedy loss under Gumbel perturbations. Since the pathology stems from the dependence of the decoded sequence on the model parameters, we analyze the update direction obtained by applying a stop gradient on the sampling procedure, leading to a moment matching direction. While it is not the gradient of any loss function, we prove that it defines a valid descent direction in function space for the autoregressive negative log-likelihood. Despite these theoretical insights, the moment matching direction suffers from high variance. We conclude that teacher forcing may well be ``all you need'' for supervised learning of autoregressive models.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-12 20:51 · 最新观测版本

On the Difficulty of Sequence-Level Supervised Learning for Autoregressive Language Models

During the supervised learning phase, autoregressive language models are typically trained by minimizing the negative log-likelihood of the training data, which decomposes as a sum of token-level cross-entropies via teacher forcing. This objective is simple and efficient but potentially suffers from so-called exposure bias: a mismatch between the way the model is trained and the way it is used at inference time. Can we instead design sequence-level loss functions that incorporate inference-time decoding procedures, such as greedy decoding or autoregressive sampling? We show that two natural attempts lead to loss functions that are fundamentally flawed: unbounded below. We further show that these two flawed loss functions are intimately connected: using autoregressive Gumbel tricks, the sampling based loss is the expected greedy loss under Gumbel perturbations. Since the pathology stems from the dependence of the decoded sequence on the model parameters, we analyze the update direction obtained by applying a stop gradient on the sampling procedure, leading to a moment matching direction. While it is not the gradient of any loss function, we prove that it defines a valid descent direction in function space for the autoregressive negative log-likelihood. Despite these theoretical insights, the moment matching direction suffers from high variance. We conclude that teacher forcing may well be ``all you need'' for supervised learning of autoregressive models.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗