跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.16750 · v1

Interpretable machine learning diagnosis of degradation mechanisms in lead-free $RbSn_{0.5}Ge_{0.5}I_{3}$ solar cells from temperature- and illumination-dependent electrical measurements

首次提交 2026-11-12 21:03
版本更新 2026-11-12 21:03
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:15
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Machine learning coupled with device simulation is widely used to optimize thin-film solar cells, but almost exclusively in the forward direction, from device parameters to predicted performance. The inverse problem encountered after fabrication, namely identifying the mechanism that limits a given device, is still addressed by manual inspection of characterization data. In this work, both directions are examined for lead-free $RbSn_{0.5}Ge_{0.5}I_{3}$ solar cells using approximately 42,000 SCAPS-1D simulations. Replacing the Spiro-OMeTAD hole transport layer with CuI increases the simulated power conversion efficiency from 19.6\% to 21.6\%, almost entirely through the fill factor. Surrogate models trained and tested on a factorial parameter grid substantially overstate their predictive accuracy. An XGBoost regressor attains $R^2 = 0.9997$ on held-out grid points but only 0.58 on independently sampled devices, whereas training on a Latin hypercube design of comparable size restores $R^2 = 0.995$. For the inverse problem, a multi-label classifier identifies which of six degradation mechanisms are present from simulated temperature- and illumination-dependent open-circuit-voltage measurements. It achieves a macro $F_1$ score of 0.938, compared to 0.687 for a calibrated physics-rule baseline. The classifier does not, however, generalize to combinations of mechanisms absent from the training set.

作者备注:Under review in RSC Advances

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-12 21:03 · 最新观测版本

Interpretable machine learning diagnosis of degradation mechanisms in lead-free $RbSn_{0.5}Ge_{0.5}I_{3}$ solar cells from temperature- and illumination-dependent electrical measurements

Machine learning coupled with device simulation is widely used to optimize thin-film solar cells, but almost exclusively in the forward direction, from device parameters to predicted performance. The inverse problem encountered after fabrication, namely identifying the mechanism that limits a given device, is still addressed by manual inspection of characterization data. In this work, both directions are examined for lead-free $RbSn_{0.5}Ge_{0.5}I_{3}$ solar cells using approximately 42,000 SCAPS-1D simulations. Replacing the Spiro-OMeTAD hole transport layer with CuI increases the simulated power conversion efficiency from 19.6\% to 21.6\%, almost entirely through the fill factor. Surrogate models trained and tested on a factorial parameter grid substantially overstate their predictive accuracy. An XGBoost regressor attains $R^2 = 0.9997$ on held-out grid points but only 0.58 on independently sampled devices, whereas training on a Latin hypercube design of comparable size restores $R^2 = 0.995$. For the inverse problem, a multi-label classifier identifies which of six degradation mechanisms are present from simulated temperature- and illumination-dependent open-circuit-voltage measurements. It achieves a macro $F_1$ score of 0.938, compared to 0.687 for a calibrated physics-rule baseline. The classifier does not, however, generalize to combinations of mechanisms absent from the training set.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗