跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.16902 · v1

Non-Functional Requirements to Hyperparameter Translation for Quantum Software via LLMs

首次提交 2026-11-12 22:57
版本更新 2026-11-12 22:57
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:15
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Quantum software engineering (QSE) lacks validated approaches for translating natural-language non-functional requirements (NFRs) into execution parameters such as shots and transpiler optimization levels. Existing methods emphasize semantic similarity rather than execution outcomes. We evaluate seven large language models (LLMs) against a deterministic heuristic baseline using 540 synthetic and 18 real-world user stories. We assess semantic accuracy and execution outcomes, including time, cost, top-state probability, and two-qubit gate exposure, through Qiskit/Aer simulations. All LLMs significantly outperformed the heuristic in semantic accuracy, achieving 55.6 to 83.3 percent on real-world stories compared to 16.7 percent for the heuristic. However, no LLM demonstrated statistically significant superiority over others on the real-world dataset. Speed- and cost-oriented configurations reduced execution time and cost, but fidelity improvements were not supported. Some failures resulted from provider safety refusals rather than translation errors. Our findings demonstrate the potential of LLMs as middleware for NFR-to-configuration translation in QSE, while emphasizing execution-based validation, human oversight, and careful interpretation of model differences.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-12 22:57 · 最新观测版本

Non-Functional Requirements to Hyperparameter Translation for Quantum Software via LLMs

Quantum software engineering (QSE) lacks validated approaches for translating natural-language non-functional requirements (NFRs) into execution parameters such as shots and transpiler optimization levels. Existing methods emphasize semantic similarity rather than execution outcomes. We evaluate seven large language models (LLMs) against a deterministic heuristic baseline using 540 synthetic and 18 real-world user stories. We assess semantic accuracy and execution outcomes, including time, cost, top-state probability, and two-qubit gate exposure, through Qiskit/Aer simulations. All LLMs significantly outperformed the heuristic in semantic accuracy, achieving 55.6 to 83.3 percent on real-world stories compared to 16.7 percent for the heuristic. However, no LLM demonstrated statistically significant superiority over others on the real-world dataset. Speed- and cost-oriented configurations reduced execution time and cost, but fidelity improvements were not supported. Some failures resulted from provider safety refusals rather than translation errors. Our findings demonstrate the potential of LLMs as middleware for NFR-to-configuration translation in QSE, while emphasizing execution-based validation, human oversight, and careful interpretation of model differences.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗