跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.17011 · v1

Random Exploration is Random

随机探索确实是随机的

首次提交 2026-11-13 00:07
版本更新 2026-11-13 00:07
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:15
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Decision making often requires balancing exploitation of familiar options with exploration of uncertain alternatives. One strategy for exploration is random exploration, in which choices become more variable and less tied to the option that currently appears best. However, it remains unclear whether this variability reflects genuine stochasticity or instead a deterministic structure that traditional cognitive models fail to capture. We examined this question using the Horizon Task in an aggregated dataset of 1,392 participants completing over 1,270,695 trials. In this task, exploration becomes more valuable when participants have more future choices, and choice variability increases under longer horizons. We tested whether more expressive neural network models could recover deterministic structure from this additional variability. Although neural networks provided better overall fits to behavior than the traditional model, long-horizon choices remained consistently less predictable than short-horizon choices. These findings show that limited model expressiveness cannot fully account for the increased variability associated with random exploration, suggesting random exploration truly is substantially random.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

基于大规模 Horizon Task 数据,作者报告即使使用表达能力更强的神经网络模型,长视野下的选择仍比短视野更难预测,提示随机探索中的变异性在很大程度上是真正的随机性。

正在读取账号与研究记录…

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-13 00:07 · 最新观测版本

Random Exploration is Random

Decision making often requires balancing exploitation of familiar options with exploration of uncertain alternatives. One strategy for exploration is random exploration, in which choices become more variable and less tied to the option that currently appears best. However, it remains unclear whether this variability reflects genuine stochasticity or instead a deterministic structure that traditional cognitive models fail to capture. We examined this question using the Horizon Task in an aggregated dataset of 1,392 participants completing over 1,270,695 trials. In this task, exploration becomes more valuable when participants have more future choices, and choice variability increases under longer horizons. We tested whether more expressive neural network models could recover deterministic structure from this additional variability. Although neural networks provided better overall fits to behavior than the traditional model, long-horizon choices remained consistently less predictable than short-horizon choices. These findings show that limited model expressiveness cannot fully account for the increased variability associated with random exploration, suggesting random exploration truly is substantially random.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗