跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.17083 · v1

List Update with Time Windows and Delays without Batch-Serving

首次提交 2026-11-13 00:50
版本更新 2026-11-13 00:50
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:15
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

We study list update with time windows and delays when every request requires a separate access. Unlike batch-serving models, serving several requests to one element still incurs one access per request, and each access may change the list for subsequent requests. For time windows of overlap at most k≥2k\ge2, our deterministic First-Element Removal algorithm is (3−2/k)(3-2/k)-competitive, hence 33-competitive in general. Against an oblivious adversary, a randomized adaptation of BIT is 7/47/4-competitive on arbitrary 22-overlap inputs. More generally, on inputs without self-overlap, it is (13/4−9/[2(k+1)])\left(13/4-9/[2(k+1)]\right)-competitive for every k≥2k\ge2. For delays, we give a deterministic 55-competitive algorithm and a lower bound of 2+32+\sqrt3 for deterministic delay-unaware algorithms. Our analyses extend inversion potentials with per-request credits that reconcile different service times and orders.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-13 00:50 · 最新观测版本

List Update with Time Windows and Delays without Batch-Serving

We study list update with time windows and delays when every request requires a separate access. Unlike batch-serving models, serving several requests to one element still incurs one access per request, and each access may change the list for subsequent requests. For time windows of overlap at most k≥2k\ge2, our deterministic First-Element Removal algorithm is (3−2/k)(3-2/k)-competitive, hence 33-competitive in general. Against an oblivious adversary, a randomized adaptation of BIT is 7/47/4-competitive on arbitrary 22-overlap inputs. More generally, on inputs without self-overlap, it is (13/4−9/[2(k+1)])\left(13/4-9/[2(k+1)]\right)-competitive for every k≥2k\ge2. For delays, we give a deterministic 55-competitive algorithm and a lower bound of 2+32+\sqrt3 for deterministic delay-unaware algorithms. Our analyses extend inversion potentials with per-request credits that reconcile different service times and orders.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗