← 研踪 PaperTrailACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-industry.138 · 记录 #1
TEN: Table Explicitization, Neurosymbolically
来源日期（仅到月份） 2026-07
来源记录日期 2026-07
雷达观测 2026-11-01 22:06
摘要
We present TEN, a neurosymbolic approach for extracting tabular data from semistructured text such as copy-pasted content from PDFs, emails, or OCR-flattened outputs. This task poses real-world challenges in domains like finance and healthcare, where manual copy-paste into spreadsheets introduces errors and OCR distortions compromise data integrity, leading to financial losses and flawed decisions.Purely neural methods suffer from hallucinations and structural inconsistencies, hindering deployment robustness. TEN addresses this via a novel triadic feedback loop that iteratively refines table hypotheses to enforce constraints and achieve verifiable convergence.Experiments show TEN outperforms neural baselines in exact match accuracy and lower hallucination rates. A 21-participant user study rates TEN tables more accurate and preferred in over 60% of pairwise comparisons, though verification and correction effort did not differ significantly between conditions.
论文发现出处
这些页面提供论文线索，不代表同行评审或质量认证。
观测到的版本
平台记录号代表本站观测到的元数据变化，不是作者修订号。来源日期仅到月份或年份时，按该月或该年首日存档。
记录 #1 · 2026-07 · 最新观测版本
TEN: Table Explicitization, Neurosymbolically
We present TEN, a neurosymbolic approach for extracting tabular data from semistructured text such as copy-pasted content from PDFs, emails, or OCR-flattened outputs. This task poses real-world challenges in domains like finance and healthcare, where manual copy-paste into spreadsheets introduces errors and OCR distortions compromise data integrity, leading to financial losses and flawed decisions.Purely neural methods suffer from hallucinations and structural inconsistencies, hindering deployment robustness. TEN addresses this via a novel triadic feedback loop that iteratively refines table hypotheses to enforce constraints and achieve verifiable convergence.Experiments show TEN outperforms neural baselines in exact match accuracy and lower hallucination rates. A 21-participant user study rates TEN tables more accurate and preferred in over 60% of pairwise comparisons, though verification and correction effort did not differ significantly between conditions.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗