跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-industry.35 · 记录 #1

NEST: Nested Evidence Survival for Retrieval

来源日期(仅到月份) 2026-07
来源记录日期 2026-07
雷达观测 2026-11-01 22:08
ACL Anthology · ACL 2026 ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems degrade sharply under extreme noise, where relevant evidence is sparse and easily pruned by static retrieval decisions. Existing approaches fixed top-k retrieval, hierarchical chunking, cross-encoder reranking, or policy-based iterative control- either rely on rigid heuristics or incur substantial computational overhead, and often fail to recover context-dependent evidence without introducing redundancy or latency. We introduce NEST (Nested Evidence Survival for Retrieval), a lightweight, training-free RAG framework that improves factual grounding by explicitly separating recall amplification from precision selection. NEST first maximizes recall through Nested Evidence Survival, evaluating candidates under nested retrieval contexts to rescue evidence that would otherwise be pruned by static chunking. It then applies a survival-consistent Mean Reciprocal Rank (MRR) selection mechanism to retain evidence that remains salient across retrieval scopes, removing redundancy without harming recall. Evaluated on WebQuestions, HotpotQA (distractor setting), and a proprietary InternalQA benchmark with 50M Common Crawl distractors, NEST consistently outperforms strong adaptive RAG baselines, including DeepRAG, improving EM by up to +2.4 pp and F1 by +2.1 pp, while increasing retrieval recall by +6.8 pp. These gains are achieved with only 12–18 ms additional latency. Ablation studies confirm that Nested Evidence Survival drives recall improvements, while MRR-based selection converts these gains into precision, demonstrating that recall-first retrieval with principled pruning can outperform iterative control and model scaling in retrieval-augmented generation.

论文发现出处

这些页面提供论文线索,不代表同行评审或质量认证。

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

发表信息与关联版本

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

平台记录号代表本站观测到的元数据变化,不是作者修订号。来源日期仅到月份或年份时,按该月或该年首日存档。

记录 #1 · 2026-07 · 最新观测版本

NEST: Nested Evidence Survival for Retrieval

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems degrade sharply under extreme noise, where relevant evidence is sparse and easily pruned by static retrieval decisions. Existing approaches fixed top-k retrieval, hierarchical chunking, cross-encoder reranking, or policy-based iterative control- either rely on rigid heuristics or incur substantial computational overhead, and often fail to recover context-dependent evidence without introducing redundancy or latency. We introduce NEST (Nested Evidence Survival for Retrieval), a lightweight, training-free RAG framework that improves factual grounding by explicitly separating recall amplification from precision selection. NEST first maximizes recall through Nested Evidence Survival, evaluating candidates under nested retrieval contexts to rescue evidence that would otherwise be pruned by static chunking. It then applies a survival-consistent Mean Reciprocal Rank (MRR) selection mechanism to retain evidence that remains salient across retrieval scopes, removing redundancy without harming recall. Evaluated on WebQuestions, HotpotQA (distractor setting), and a proprietary InternalQA benchmark with 50M Common Crawl distractors, NEST consistently outperforms strong adaptive RAG baselines, including DeepRAG, improving EM by up to +2.4 pp and F1 by +2.1 pp, while increasing retrieval recall by +6.8 pp. These gains are achieved with only 12–18 ms additional latency. Ablation studies confirm that Nested Evidence Survival drives recall improvements, while MRR-based selection converts these gains into precision, demonstrating that recall-first retrieval with principled pruning can outperform iterative control and model scaling in retrieval-augmented generation.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗