跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-industry.49 · 记录 #1

IndustryAssetEQA: A Neurosymbolic Operational Intelligence System for Embodied Question Answering in Industrial Asset Maintenance

来源日期(仅到月份) 2026-07
来源记录日期 2026-07
雷达观测 2026-11-01 22:08
ACL Anthology · ACL 2026 ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Industrial maintenance environments increasingly rely on AI systems to assist operators in understanding asset behavior, diagnosing failures, and evaluating interventions. Although large language models (LLMs) enable fluent natural-language interaction, deployed maintenance assistants routinely produce generic explanations that are weakly grounded in telemetry, omit verifiable provenance, and offer no testable support for counterfactual or action-oriented reasoning that undermine trust in safety-critical settings. We present IndustryAssetEQA, a neurosymbolic operational intelligence system that combines episode-centric telemetry representations with a Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Knowledge Graph (FMEA-KG) to enable Embodied Question Answering (EQA) over industrial assets. We evaluate on four datasets covering four industrial asset types, including rotating machinery, turbofan engines, hydraulic systems, and cyber–physical production systems. Compared to LLM-only baselines, IndustryAssetEQA improves structural validity by up to +0.51, counterfactual accuracy by up to +0.47, and explanation entailment by +0.64, while reducing severe expert-rated overclaims from 28% to 2% ( 93%). Code, datasets, and the FMEA-KG are available at: https://github.com/IBM/AssetOpsBench/tree/IndustryAssetEQA/IndustryAssetEQA

论文发现出处

这些页面提供论文线索,不代表同行评审或质量认证。

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

发表信息与关联版本

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

平台记录号代表本站观测到的元数据变化,不是作者修订号。来源日期仅到月份或年份时,按该月或该年首日存档。

记录 #1 · 2026-07 · 最新观测版本

IndustryAssetEQA: A Neurosymbolic Operational Intelligence System for Embodied Question Answering in Industrial Asset Maintenance

Industrial maintenance environments increasingly rely on AI systems to assist operators in understanding asset behavior, diagnosing failures, and evaluating interventions. Although large language models (LLMs) enable fluent natural-language interaction, deployed maintenance assistants routinely produce generic explanations that are weakly grounded in telemetry, omit verifiable provenance, and offer no testable support for counterfactual or action-oriented reasoning that undermine trust in safety-critical settings. We present IndustryAssetEQA, a neurosymbolic operational intelligence system that combines episode-centric telemetry representations with a Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Knowledge Graph (FMEA-KG) to enable Embodied Question Answering (EQA) over industrial assets. We evaluate on four datasets covering four industrial asset types, including rotating machinery, turbofan engines, hydraulic systems, and cyber–physical production systems. Compared to LLM-only baselines, IndustryAssetEQA improves structural validity by up to +0.51, counterfactual accuracy by up to +0.47, and explanation entailment by +0.64, while reducing severe expert-rated overclaims from 28% to 2% ( 93%). Code, datasets, and the FMEA-KG are available at: https://github.com/IBM/AssetOpsBench/tree/IndustryAssetEQA/IndustryAssetEQA

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗