← 研踪 PaperTrailACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.1067 · 记录 #1
Learning What to Ignore: Mitigating Negative Transfer in Medical Knowledge Fusion via Clinical Task-Adaptive Selection
来源日期（仅到月份） 2026-07
来源记录日期 2026-07
雷达观测 2026-11-01 21:56
摘要
Integrating external medical knowledge into longitudinal electronic health record modeling is a prevailing paradigm to mitigate clinical data sparsity. However, existing approaches face a reliability-timeliness dilemma, struggling to balance the structural authority of static ontologies with the reasoning flexibility of large language models. Furthermore, most frameworks overlook the risk of relative negative transfer, where indiscriminately fusing task-irrelevant knowledge can introduce noise or even cause conflicts that weakens patient-specific signals. In this paper, we propose TrustKE, a Trustworthy Knowledge Enhancement framework. First, we construct a dual-layer knowledge graph that anchors dynamic, evidence-based chain-of-thought reasoning from medical literature within the stable structure of medical knowledge graph. Second, we introduce a task-adaptive knowledge selection mechanism that dynamically optimizes the graph, retaining only task-specific signals. Extensive experiments on MIMIC-III and MIMIC-IV across four clinical tasks show that TrustKE outperforms state-of-the-art baselines. Our analysis confirms that TrustKE effectively mitigates negative transfer while offering transparent reasoning for clinical decision-making.
论文发现出处
这些页面提供论文线索，不代表同行评审或质量认证。
观测到的版本
平台记录号代表本站观测到的元数据变化，不是作者修订号。来源日期仅到月份或年份时，按该月或该年首日存档。
记录 #1 · 2026-07 · 最新观测版本
Learning What to Ignore: Mitigating Negative Transfer in Medical Knowledge Fusion via Clinical Task-Adaptive Selection
Integrating external medical knowledge into longitudinal electronic health record modeling is a prevailing paradigm to mitigate clinical data sparsity. However, existing approaches face a reliability-timeliness dilemma, struggling to balance the structural authority of static ontologies with the reasoning flexibility of large language models. Furthermore, most frameworks overlook the risk of relative negative transfer, where indiscriminately fusing task-irrelevant knowledge can introduce noise or even cause conflicts that weakens patient-specific signals. In this paper, we propose TrustKE, a Trustworthy Knowledge Enhancement framework. First, we construct a dual-layer knowledge graph that anchors dynamic, evidence-based chain-of-thought reasoning from medical literature within the stable structure of medical knowledge graph. Second, we introduce a task-adaptive knowledge selection mechanism that dynamically optimizes the graph, retaining only task-specific signals. Extensive experiments on MIMIC-III and MIMIC-IV across four clinical tasks show that TrustKE outperforms state-of-the-art baselines. Our analysis confirms that TrustKE effectively mitigates negative transfer while offering transparent reasoning for clinical decision-making.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗