← 研踪 PaperTrailACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.1957 · 记录 #1
Evaluating Language Model Pluralism through In-the-wild Crowd Discussions
来源日期（仅到月份） 2026-07
来源记录日期 2026-07
雷达观测 2026-11-01 21:48
摘要
When answering subjective questions, an ideal LLM should surface diverse plausible perspectives rather than favoring a single viewpoint, a characteristic known as pluralism. Recent studies show that modern LLMs optimized through preference alignment systematically favor certain positions on subjective queries, making pluralism evaluation increasingly important. However, existing evaluation methods focus dominantly on multiple-choice and question-answering tasks, leaving open-ended generation largely unaddressed.We propose PLURALEVAL, an evaluation framework that assesses LLM pluralism in open-ended generation by comparing outputs against free-form crowd responses. Our approach decomposes ground-truth responses into atomic, non-overlapping claims, then evaluates whether LLMs adequately cover this diverse claim space. We then introduce WildSCOPE, a multi-domain dataset of natural crowd responses, and demonstrate that PLURALEVAL captures novel insights, such as the collapse of pluralism through sycophancy, where LLM systematically degrades in overton pluralism when a user’s belief is revealed. Finally, we discuss the value and actionable insights for preserving and encouraging pluralism from LLM deployers’ side.
论文发现出处
这些页面提供论文线索，不代表同行评审或质量认证。
观测到的版本
平台记录号代表本站观测到的元数据变化，不是作者修订号。来源日期仅到月份或年份时，按该月或该年首日存档。
记录 #1 · 2026-07 · 最新观测版本
Evaluating Language Model Pluralism through In-the-wild Crowd Discussions
When answering subjective questions, an ideal LLM should surface diverse plausible perspectives rather than favoring a single viewpoint, a characteristic known as pluralism. Recent studies show that modern LLMs optimized through preference alignment systematically favor certain positions on subjective queries, making pluralism evaluation increasingly important. However, existing evaluation methods focus dominantly on multiple-choice and question-answering tasks, leaving open-ended generation largely unaddressed.We propose PLURALEVAL, an evaluation framework that assesses LLM pluralism in open-ended generation by comparing outputs against free-form crowd responses. Our approach decomposes ground-truth responses into atomic, non-overlapping claims, then evaluates whether LLMs adequately cover this diverse claim space. We then introduce WildSCOPE, a multi-domain dataset of natural crowd responses, and demonstrate that PLURALEVAL captures novel insights, such as the collapse of pluralism through sycophancy, where LLM systematically degrades in overton pluralism when a user’s belief is revealed. Finally, we discuss the value and actionable insights for preserving and encouraging pluralism from LLM deployers’ side.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗