← 研踪 PaperTrailACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.2188 · 记录 #1
Characterizing and Evaluating Working Emotion Vocabularies in Multilingual Large Language Models
来源日期（仅到月份） 2026-07
来源记录日期 2026-07
雷达观测 2026-11-01 21:46
摘要
Prior work evaluating emotion and affective understanding in large language models (LLMs) typically rely on predetermined label sets or focus on a singular evaluation task (e.g., emotion detection). We consider affective states, referring to the much broader variety of terms people use to label their emotional experiences. We evaluate multilingual language models’ understanding of affective states in English and Spanish through three different tasks: 1) identification, where models predict an affective state given text, 2) expression, where models generate text expressing a given affective state, and 3) verification, where models report whether a given term refers to an affective state. We show that performance on one task is not necessarily predictive of performance on another. Using these three tasks, we then begin to explore when and why models struggle to understand particular affective states compared to others. We examine systematic patterns in the affective state terms that are well and poorly understood by models, characterizing the working emotion vocabulary of LLMs.
论文发现出处
这些页面提供论文线索，不代表同行评审或质量认证。
观测到的版本
平台记录号代表本站观测到的元数据变化，不是作者修订号。来源日期仅到月份或年份时，按该月或该年首日存档。
记录 #1 · 2026-07 · 最新观测版本
Characterizing and Evaluating Working Emotion Vocabularies in Multilingual Large Language Models
Prior work evaluating emotion and affective understanding in large language models (LLMs) typically rely on predetermined label sets or focus on a singular evaluation task (e.g., emotion detection). We consider affective states, referring to the much broader variety of terms people use to label their emotional experiences. We evaluate multilingual language models’ understanding of affective states in English and Spanish through three different tasks: 1) identification, where models predict an affective state given text, 2) expression, where models generate text expressing a given affective state, and 3) verification, where models report whether a given term refers to an affective state. We show that performance on one task is not necessarily predictive of performance on another. Using these three tasks, we then begin to explore when and why models struggle to understand particular affective states compared to others. We examine systematic patterns in the affective state terms that are well and poorly understood by models, characterizing the working emotion vocabulary of LLMs.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗