← 研踪 PaperTrailACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.243 · 记录 #1
A Theoretically Grounded Approach to Summarizing Conversation Dynamics for Forecasting the Derailment of Online Conversations
来源日期（仅到月份） 2026-07
来源记录日期 2026-07
雷达观测 2026-11-01 22:04
摘要
Conversation derailment prediction represents a new paradigm of toxicity detection, where a system predicts from the start of a conversation whether it will derail into toxic exchanges, allowing moderators and users to act preemptively before harm is done. This approach requires a deep understanding of conversation dynamics. Previous work relies on linguistic features rooted in linguistic and social theories. While these features provide signals of conversation dynamics, they are exploratory in nature and potentially reflect a fraction of the overall pragmatic devices shaping the conversation trajectory. To capture the pragmatic dimension of conversations systematically, we start with a framework for annotating pragmatic information of conversations systematically and design summary generation methods to capture conversation trajectory dynamically. We achieve about 10% performance increase over a simple baseline, and 6.47% increase over a strong baseline on a dataset, and a slight performance increase on a benchmark dataset for the task of summarizing conversation dynamics.
论文发现出处
这些页面提供论文线索，不代表同行评审或质量认证。
观测到的版本
平台记录号代表本站观测到的元数据变化，不是作者修订号。来源日期仅到月份或年份时，按该月或该年首日存档。
记录 #1 · 2026-07 · 最新观测版本
A Theoretically Grounded Approach to Summarizing Conversation Dynamics for Forecasting the Derailment of Online Conversations
Conversation derailment prediction represents a new paradigm of toxicity detection, where a system predicts from the start of a conversation whether it will derail into toxic exchanges, allowing moderators and users to act preemptively before harm is done. This approach requires a deep understanding of conversation dynamics. Previous work relies on linguistic features rooted in linguistic and social theories. While these features provide signals of conversation dynamics, they are exploratory in nature and potentially reflect a fraction of the overall pragmatic devices shaping the conversation trajectory. To capture the pragmatic dimension of conversations systematically, we start with a framework for annotating pragmatic information of conversations systematically and design summary generation methods to capture conversation trajectory dynamically. We achieve about 10% performance increase over a simple baseline, and 6.47% increase over a strong baseline on a dataset, and a slight performance increase on a benchmark dataset for the task of summarizing conversation dynamics.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗