← 研踪 PaperTrailACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.489 · 记录 #1
Reasoning with Ontology Graph: Toward Type-Constrained Knowledge Graph Question Answering
来源日期（仅到月份） 2026-07
来源记录日期 2026-07
雷达观测 2026-11-01 22:02
摘要
Large language models (LLMs) have recently advanced knowledge graph question answering (KGQA), but current methods tend to rely on LLM-induced type systems with inconsistent granularity, or perform multi-hop reasoning without explicit target-type constraints. We introduce OntGQA, a type-constrained KGQA framework that reasons over a relation-centric ontology graph, where each relation is labeled with its head and tail entity types to provide a stable schema backbone. Built on this graph, OntGQA adopts a planner–judge architecture with generative backoff: a type planner proposes plausible head–tail type pairs, a judge verifies retrieved candidates and their paths, and a generator is invoked only when all candidates are rejected. By constraining both endpoints of reasoning in type space, OntGQA achieves state-of-the-art performance and produces ontology-grounded reasoning chains, with substantial Hit@1 gains (87.7%→91.5% on WebQSP and 67.6%→74.6% on CWQ).
论文发现出处
这些页面提供论文线索，不代表同行评审或质量认证。
观测到的版本
平台记录号代表本站观测到的元数据变化，不是作者修订号。来源日期仅到月份或年份时，按该月或该年首日存档。
记录 #1 · 2026-07 · 最新观测版本
Reasoning with Ontology Graph: Toward Type-Constrained Knowledge Graph Question Answering
Large language models (LLMs) have recently advanced knowledge graph question answering (KGQA), but current methods tend to rely on LLM-induced type systems with inconsistent granularity, or perform multi-hop reasoning without explicit target-type constraints. We introduce OntGQA, a type-constrained KGQA framework that reasons over a relation-centric ontology graph, where each relation is labeled with its head and tail entity types to provide a stable schema backbone. Built on this graph, OntGQA adopts a planner–judge architecture with generative backoff: a type planner proposes plausible head–tail type pairs, a judge verifies retrieved candidates and their paths, and a generator is invoked only when all candidates are rejected. By constraining both endpoints of reasoning in type space, OntGQA achieves state-of-the-art performance and produces ontology-grounded reasoning chains, with substantial Hit@1 gains (87.7%→91.5% on WebQSP and 67.6%→74.6% on CWQ).
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗