← 研踪 PaperTrailACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.59 · 记录 #1
Beyond Detection: Evaluating Fallacy Awareness of LLMs in Interactive Scenarios
来源日期（仅到月份） 2026-07
来源记录日期 2026-07
雷达观测 2026-11-01 22:06
摘要
Large Language Models (LLMs) often fail to recognize fallacious reasoning in real-world interactions, despite strong performance on static fallacy detection tasks. We define this ability as fallacy awareness, the capacity to autonomously perceive and resist fallacies in dynamic, pragmatic contexts. To study this, we introduce ISFallacy, a large-scale Chinese benchmark of 50K interactive scenarios spanning six fallacy types, five social interaction settings, diverse role relationships, and personality traits. We further propose FATE, a two-stage evaluation framework that assesses fallacy awareness without explicit cues, combining natural dialogue responses and reasoning-based decisions. Experiments on five representative LLMs reveal a substantial gap between fallacy classification and awareness, with models particularly vulnerable to emotion-driven fallacies and scenarios involving cooperative or trust-based relationships. Deeper analysis uncovers a cognition–behavior gap and fragile internal representations underlying awareness failures. Our work establishes a foundation for evaluating and enhancing the robustness of LLMs against fallacious reasoning in interactive settings.
论文发现出处
这些页面提供论文线索，不代表同行评审或质量认证。
观测到的版本
平台记录号代表本站观测到的元数据变化，不是作者修订号。来源日期仅到月份或年份时，按该月或该年首日存档。
记录 #1 · 2026-07 · 最新观测版本
Beyond Detection: Evaluating Fallacy Awareness of LLMs in Interactive Scenarios
Large Language Models (LLMs) often fail to recognize fallacious reasoning in real-world interactions, despite strong performance on static fallacy detection tasks. We define this ability as fallacy awareness, the capacity to autonomously perceive and resist fallacies in dynamic, pragmatic contexts. To study this, we introduce ISFallacy, a large-scale Chinese benchmark of 50K interactive scenarios spanning six fallacy types, five social interaction settings, diverse role relationships, and personality traits. We further propose FATE, a two-stage evaluation framework that assesses fallacy awareness without explicit cues, combining natural dialogue responses and reasoning-based decisions. Experiments on five representative LLMs reveal a substantial gap between fallacy classification and awareness, with models particularly vulnerable to emotion-driven fallacies and scenarios involving cooperative or trust-based relationships. Deeper analysis uncovers a cognition–behavior gap and fragile internal representations underlying awareness failures. Our work establishes a foundation for evaluating and enhancing the robustness of LLMs against fallacious reasoning in interactive settings.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗