← 研踪 PaperTrailACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-short.29 · 记录 #1
Translation or Recitation? Calibrating Evaluation Scores for Machine Translation of Extremely Low-Resource Languages
来源日期（仅到月份） 2026-07
来源记录日期 2026-07
雷达观测 2026-11-01 21:44
摘要
The landscape of extremely low-resource machine translation (MT) is characterized by perplexing variability in reported performance, often making results across different language pairs difficult to contextualize. For researchers focused on specific language groups—such as ancient languages—it is nearly impossible to determine if breakthroughs reported in other contexts (e.g., African or American languages) result from superior methodologies or are merely artifacts of benchmark collection. To address this, we introduce the FRED Difficulty Metrics—Fertility Ratio (F), Retrieval Proxy (R) Pre-training Exposure (E) and Corpus Diversity (D) —that serve as dataset-intrinsic metrics to contextualize reported scores. Our findings reveal that a significant portion of result variability is explained by train-test overlap and pre-training exposure rather than model capability. Additionally, we identify that underperforming XLR languages—particularly extinct and non-Latin indigenous languages—suffer from poor tokenization coverage (high token fertility), highlighting structural limitations of transfer learning for languages outside pre-trained models’ representation space. By providing these indices alongside performance scores, we enable more transparent evaluation of cross-lingual transfer and provide a more reliable foundation for the XLR MT community.
论文发现出处
这些页面提供论文线索，不代表同行评审或质量认证。
观测到的版本
平台记录号代表本站观测到的元数据变化，不是作者修订号。来源日期仅到月份或年份时，按该月或该年首日存档。
记录 #1 · 2026-07 · 最新观测版本
Translation or Recitation? Calibrating Evaluation Scores for Machine Translation of Extremely Low-Resource Languages
The landscape of extremely low-resource machine translation (MT) is characterized by perplexing variability in reported performance, often making results across different language pairs difficult to contextualize. For researchers focused on specific language groups—such as ancient languages—it is nearly impossible to determine if breakthroughs reported in other contexts (e.g., African or American languages) result from superior methodologies or are merely artifacts of benchmark collection. To address this, we introduce the FRED Difficulty Metrics—Fertility Ratio (F), Retrieval Proxy (R) Pre-training Exposure (E) and Corpus Diversity (D) —that serve as dataset-intrinsic metrics to contextualize reported scores. Our findings reveal that a significant portion of result variability is explained by train-test overlap and pre-training exposure rather than model capability. Additionally, we identify that underperforming XLR languages—particularly extinct and non-Latin indigenous languages—suffer from poor tokenization coverage (high token fertility), highlighting structural limitations of transfer learning for languages outside pre-trained models’ representation space. By providing these indices alongside performance scores, we enable more transparent evaluation of cross-lingual transfer and provide a more reliable foundation for the XLR MT community.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗