← 研踪 PaperTrailACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-srw.11 · 记录 #1
Annotation Entropy Predicts Per-Example Learning Dynamics in LoRA Fine-Tuning
来源日期（仅到月份） 2026-07
来源记录日期 2026-07
雷达观测 2026-11-01 21:44
摘要
Annotator disagreement on tasks like natural language inference (NLI) reflects genuine linguistic ambiguity, yet most fine-tuning recipes treat every example as equally learnable. We ask whether this external signal of ambiguity predicts per-example learning dynamics under LoRA, the most widely used parameter-efficient fine-tuning method, and find that it does. Correlating annotation entropy (from ChaosNLI’s 100 labels per example) with per-example area under the loss curve (AULC) on SNLI and MNLI, the correlation is positive in all 25conditions tested (Spearman \rho {=} 0.06-0.43), with decoder-only models showing stronger correlations than encoders at matched LoRA rank. More strikingly, under LoRA contested examples exhibit un-learning: their gold-label loss increases during training, a pattern that is largely absent under full fine-tuning and IA^3 in the encoder setting where matched comparisons are available, and that we also observe under LoRA on two decoder-only models. The effect survives partial-correlation controls and replicates across seeds and datasets. A preliminary noise-injection experiment is consistent with these findings.
论文发现出处
这些页面提供论文线索，不代表同行评审或质量认证。
观测到的版本
平台记录号代表本站观测到的元数据变化，不是作者修订号。来源日期仅到月份或年份时，按该月或该年首日存档。
记录 #1 · 2026-07 · 最新观测版本
Annotation Entropy Predicts Per-Example Learning Dynamics in LoRA Fine-Tuning
Annotator disagreement on tasks like natural language inference (NLI) reflects genuine linguistic ambiguity, yet most fine-tuning recipes treat every example as equally learnable. We ask whether this external signal of ambiguity predicts per-example learning dynamics under LoRA, the most widely used parameter-efficient fine-tuning method, and find that it does. Correlating annotation entropy (from ChaosNLI’s 100 labels per example) with per-example area under the loss curve (AULC) on SNLI and MNLI, the correlation is positive in all 25conditions tested (Spearman \rho {=} 0.06-0.43), with decoder-only models showing stronger correlations than encoders at matched LoRA rank. More strikingly, under LoRA contested examples exhibit un-learning: their gold-label loss increases during training, a pattern that is largely absent under full fine-tuning and IA^3 in the encoder setting where matched comparisons are available, and that we also observe under LoRA on two decoder-only models. The effect survives partial-correlation controls and replicates across seeds and datasets. A preliminary noise-injection experiment is consistent with these findings.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗