跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-srw.18 · 记录 #1

TokLens: A Multilingual Lens on Tokenizer Quality for LLMs

来源日期(仅到月份) 2026-07
来源记录日期 2026-07
雷达观测 2026-11-01 21:44
ACL Anthology · ACL 2026 ↗PDF ↗

摘要

We introduce TokLens, an open-source toolkit for evaluating tokenizer quality across languages using six intrinsic metrics: fertility, characters per token, compression ratio, normalized sequence length, single-token retention rate, and cross-lingual parity. We evaluate 24 tokenizers from major LLM families across 15 typologically diverse languages and correlate these metrics with downstream performance. Our analysis reveals stark disparities: GPT-2 produces 56x more tokens per word in Japanese than in English, while newer tokenizers like Qwen2.5 and Gemma-2 reduce this gap to under 4x. No intrinsic metric predicts English benchmark performance after controlling for model size. However, on multilingual benchmarks (MMLU-ProX), linear mixed-effects models show that tokenizer metrics significantly predict per-language performance (STRR: \beta = +5.7, z = 18.5, p < 0.001). A controlled experiment on the Qwen2.5 family further shows that languages with higher single-token retention rate exhibit steeper scaling slopes (\rho = 0.91, p < 0.001). These results indicate that tokenizer quality is significantly associated with multilingual LLM performance, though the evidence remains correlational and partially confounded with pretraining data composition.

论文发现出处

这些页面提供论文线索,不代表同行评审或质量认证。

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

发表信息与关联版本

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

平台记录号代表本站观测到的元数据变化,不是作者修订号。来源日期仅到月份或年份时,按该月或该年首日存档。

记录 #1 · 2026-07 · 最新观测版本

TokLens: A Multilingual Lens on Tokenizer Quality for LLMs

We introduce TokLens, an open-source toolkit for evaluating tokenizer quality across languages using six intrinsic metrics: fertility, characters per token, compression ratio, normalized sequence length, single-token retention rate, and cross-lingual parity. We evaluate 24 tokenizers from major LLM families across 15 typologically diverse languages and correlate these metrics with downstream performance. Our analysis reveals stark disparities: GPT-2 produces 56x more tokens per word in Japanese than in English, while newer tokenizers like Qwen2.5 and Gemma-2 reduce this gap to under 4x. No intrinsic metric predicts English benchmark performance after controlling for model size. However, on multilingual benchmarks (MMLU-ProX), linear mixed-effects models show that tokenizer metrics significantly predict per-language performance (STRR: \beta = +5.7, z = 18.5, p < 0.001). A controlled experiment on the Qwen2.5 family further shows that languages with higher single-token retention rate exhibit steeper scaling slopes (\rho = 0.91, p < 0.001). These results indicate that tokenizer quality is significantly associated with multilingual LLM performance, though the evidence remains correlational and partially confounded with pretraining data composition.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗