跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-srw.21 · 记录 #1

NEAT-IR: Neural Explainable Analysis Tool for Information Retrieval

来源日期(仅到月份) 2026-07
来源记录日期 2026-07
雷达观测 2026-11-01 21:44
ACL Anthology · ACL 2026 ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Neural IR models achieve strong performance but remain difficult to interpret. We present NEAT-IR, a black-box analysis framework that explains ColBERT’s ranking behavior using 26 classical IR features (BM25, TF-IDF, IDF measures, positional signals). We analyze ColBERT through two complementary lenses: regression (predicting exact scores) and learning-to-rank (predicting relative order), evaluated on MS MARCO (48,250 query-passage pairs). Our key finding is a score-rank gap: classical features preserve ColBERT’s rankings nearly perfectly (NDCG@5 \approx 0.99) yet explain only R^2 \approx 0.28 of score variance. Feature attribution reveals that regression and ranking models rely on distinct feature subsets: query-level IDF signals dominate score prediction, while document-matching features (BM25, cosine TF-IDF) drive ranking preservation. These findings suggest that ColBERT’s ordinal behavior on MS MARCO is largely recoverable from classical signals, while neural contributions primarily affect score magnitude. NEAT-IR enables practitioners to diagnose when neural rankers deviate from classical patterns, supporting interpretable model auditing and informed hybrid pipeline design.

论文发现出处

这些页面提供论文线索,不代表同行评审或质量认证。

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

发表信息与关联版本

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

平台记录号代表本站观测到的元数据变化,不是作者修订号。来源日期仅到月份或年份时,按该月或该年首日存档。

记录 #1 · 2026-07 · 最新观测版本

NEAT-IR: Neural Explainable Analysis Tool for Information Retrieval

Neural IR models achieve strong performance but remain difficult to interpret. We present NEAT-IR, a black-box analysis framework that explains ColBERT’s ranking behavior using 26 classical IR features (BM25, TF-IDF, IDF measures, positional signals). We analyze ColBERT through two complementary lenses: regression (predicting exact scores) and learning-to-rank (predicting relative order), evaluated on MS MARCO (48,250 query-passage pairs). Our key finding is a score-rank gap: classical features preserve ColBERT’s rankings nearly perfectly (NDCG@5 \approx 0.99) yet explain only R^2 \approx 0.28 of score variance. Feature attribution reveals that regression and ranking models rely on distinct feature subsets: query-level IDF signals dominate score prediction, while document-matching features (BM25, cosine TF-IDF) drive ranking preservation. These findings suggest that ColBERT’s ordinal behavior on MS MARCO is largely recoverable from classical signals, while neural contributions primarily affect score magnitude. NEAT-IR enables practitioners to diagnose when neural rankers deviate from classical patterns, supporting interpretable model auditing and informed hybrid pipeline design.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗