论文库

Despite the success of discrete diffusion language models (dLMs) for fast parallel decoding, their non-smooth, high-dimensional space hinders trajectory steering for reasoning and inference acceleration. To overcome this, we present Nemotron-Labs-Sigma, the first family of large-scale (3B/8B) continuous dLMs built on steerable, low-dimensional ODE/SDE latent trajectories. Trained blockwise via likelihood optimization, Nemotron-Labs-Sigma jointly denoises Gaussian-corrupted token embeddings while learning an optimal embedding geometry, and leverages pretrained autoregressive (AR) weights for warm-starting. At inference, we identify classifier-free guidance and score temperature as essential for high-fidelity reasoning and coding. Against state-of-the-art discrete counterparts (masked dLMs and AR baselines), Nemotron-Labs-Sigma outperforms them on standard benchmarks after pretraining (e.g., GSM8K, Minerva, HumanEval, MBPP) and on challenging reasoning tasks after supervised fine-tuning (e.g., MATH-500, AIME), with the largest consistent gains on coding. Beyond accuracy, we exploit two structural properties unique to continuous dLMs. First, smooth trajectories degrade gracefully at low NFEs and enable efficient few-step distillation: distribution matching proves strongest among the methods we study, giving roughly 8x acceleration on math and 4x on coding (8 and 4 tokens per forward pass) with negligible accuracy loss and preserved diversity. In addition, the one-step speculative decoding on the (pre-SFT) distilled 8B model yields a further ~3.5x throughput gain over the AR counterpart (on GB200), outperforming masked dLM baselines. Second, embedding-space steering controls the quality--diversity trade-off, yielding strong pass@$k$ that keeps improving as $k$ grows. Together, these results establish continuous dLMs as a promising paradigm for efficient language generation.

Kalah is a classic two-player game in the mancala family of sowing games. Computers have solved several standard-size starting positions, but the complexity of the game on boards of growing size has remained open. We study the natural generalization in which the number of pits per side is part of the input and an arbitrary position is given, with the stone counts given in unary. We show that deciding whether a designated player can force a win from such a position is PSPACE-complete. The hard positions have Alice to move first and both stores initially empty. The same positions are hard under either common convention for capture opposite an empty pit, and with or without the bonus rule, which gives a player another turn when the last stone is sown into their own store. We introduce Line Kalah as an intermediate problem, a game on a line in which stones that leave the line effectively disappear and Alice must save each of her target pits before Bob captures it, and we reduce quantified Boolean formulas to it. The reduction uses a set of sequential timer piles whose last stones approach a group of targets, forcing Alice to choose between two captures in order to set the truth value of a variable, and a final capture gadget to test a clause chosen by Bob (only one is needed adversarially). Since either player may move any pile at any time, the stages are placed so that premature timer firings protect earlier potential targets. For a true formula, Alice's strategy against arbitrary opposing play either gains enough time to save the remaining targets (after Bob deviates from the intended play) or reaches the final test with a correctly encoded, protected input. Finally, the line positions are embedded in Kalah with both stores empty. A separate Bob pit holds the score adjustment, so the winner takes a strict majority of the stones.

We study maximum matching when the edges of a fixed graph arrive in a uniformly random order. For any fixed $\varepsilon>0$, we give a one-pass algorithm that achieves, with high probability over the arrival order, approximation ratios of $0.71295$ for unweighted graphs and $0.71295-\varepsilon$ for weighted graphs, using near-linear space with an explicit charge for weight precision. Both approximation ratios hold for bipartite and general graphs. The algorithm does not require the stream length or the weight range in advance. The main structural ingredient is a historical deletion inequality for weighted matchings. The deletion price of a vertex set is the decrease in maximum matching weight when that set is removed. We bound the sum of these prices for pairwise disjoint vertex sets, even when each price is evaluated at a different stage as edges are added to the graph. Applied to the usual unfolding of integer weights, it transfers a bipartite cardinality certificate to an original weighted matching, even when the original graph is not bipartite. This transfer preserves the approximation coefficient. We combine this transfer with a refined analysis of fractional matchings in the two auxiliary graphs arising in the transfer theorem. An exact rational linear-programming certificate proves the stated constant for every feasible graph profile. The approximation guarantees and the new structural results are formally verified in Lean.

Large language models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated the ability to generate parameters for variational quantum circuits without conventional optimization. However, the conditions under which this approach is effective remain unclear. Here, we investigate a frozen, general-purpose LLM that generates complete circuit parameter vectors from symbolic circuit and Hamiltonian descriptions, with optional iterative energy feedback. We evaluate the approach on general random Hamiltonians, structured parent Hamiltonians, and molecular systems. For general Hamiltonians, LLM-generated parameters exhibit larger energy errors than conventional Adam optimization, while additional feedback generally provides limited improvement. In contrast, for structured Hamiltonians, the LLM can generate promising low-energy parameter configurations, suggesting that identifiable physical and mathematical structure facilitates parameter inference. We also show that direct LLM predictions of minimum energies can violate the Hamiltonian spectral lower bound, whereas generated circuit parameters allow independent evaluation of physically realizable energy expectation values. Finally, we investigate blind circuit interpretation and find that the LLM can predict measurement outcomes even when it fails to identify the underlying quantum algorithm. These findings highlight the role of problem structure, the limitations of iterative LLM optimization, and the importance of independently verifiable predictions in quantum parameter programming.

Modern automated heuristic discovery (AHD) systems increasingly rival hand-crafted heuristics by leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) to iteratively mutate and refine solutions. A natural assumption is that more powerful and more expensive models consistently yield better heuristics. We challenge this empirically: across multiple NP-hard combinatorial optimization problems, we find no consistent advantage for larger, costlier models. This raises a deeper question: given a pool of LLMs spanning frontier and freely hosted or open-weight models, how should one adaptively select which model to invoke at each step of the search? The challenge is non-trivial. The optimal LLM may shift over the course of a run, and because one LLM's output seeds the context for subsequent calls, each model's reward signal is non-stationary and entangled across the heuristic population, thus violating the independence assumptions of classical online decision-making settings. We address this through Ballad (Bandit-based LLM Routing for Automated Heuristic Discovery), an online bandit algorithm that learns to orchestrate a pool of LLMs into an ensemble that matches or exceeds what any soloist LLM achieves alone. This orchestration is powered by an LLM selection policy that favors rare, high-scoring heuristics over stable averages, a DAG-based credit propagation mechanism through the genealogy of the heuristic population, and discounting of stale observations to remain attuned to each model's current utility. Across five NP-hard combinatorial optimization problems and a pool of four models of varying capability and cost, Ballad not only matches the best individual LLM in hindsight but, in several cases, surpasses every individual model while reducing API cost by up to 65.6% relative to always using the strongest model.

Multi-modal three-dimensional (3D) medical imaging data, derived from ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT), provide a widely adopted approach for non-invasive anatomical visualization. However, accurate modeling depends on surface reconstruction and frame-to-frame interpolation, where traditional methods often struggle with image noise and incomplete information between sparse frames. To address these challenges, we present \our{}, a novel framework based on Gaussian Splatting (GS) designed for high-fidelity 3D anatomical reconstruction. Uniquely, \our{} employs a multi-task architecture that simultaneously performs frame interpolation and segmentation using a unified geometric representation. By coupling these tasks, the model leverages dense signals from image synthesis to regularize the geometry, enabling high-quality surface extraction even from a limited number of input frames. Specifically, medical data are modeled as Folded-Gaussians with dual color attributes, supported by an In-Between Frame Regularization (IBFR) mechanism. Experimental results demonstrate that \our{} achieves higher metric scores than implicit neural representations and improves interpolation quality. Repository: https://github.com/gmum/MedGS

In interactive systems where users engage with LLMs, users are adaptive and, after observing LLM responses, can change their prompting strategy, as well as the type and difficulty of subsequent tasks. Thus model responses can influence the set of prompts on which the model is subsequently evaluated. We study the implications of this user adaptivity and prompt endogeneity for the evaluation of LLMs. We define two classes of estimands for comparing models: the common-distribution effect, which compares model performance on the same distribution of prompts, and the induced-distribution effect, which compares each model on the prompt distribution generated through user interaction. We show that offline benchmark evaluation and live A/B testing target different quantities, with the standard difference-in-means estimators for the two methods converging to the common-distribution effect and the induced-distribution effect, respectively. This distinction can affect decision-making: the two comparisons can rank models differently and lead to discrepancies in deployment recommendations. We characterize when such ranking reversals occur and provide a sufficient condition under which the rankings are guaranteed to agree. This result provides a practical heuristic for assessing whether offline evaluation is sufficient to reproduce the decision suggested by a live experiment. Third, we show, in a stylized linear model of interactions, that user adaptivity can increase variance in estimation. Finally, we discuss implications of user adaptivity for the interpretation of experiments and show that adaptivity creates a common mechanism leading to common evaluation challenges, such as reward hacking and novelty effects. Together, this work highlights the necessity of measuring both model performance as well as changes in the user behavior that the model induces.

For robots to assist, serve, and collaborate with humans, they must not only interpret human requests conveyed through language and multimodal intentional cues, but also execute long-horizon tasks that interleave navigation and manipulation. In this paper, we introduce HEIR, a resource for studying how to Harness Egocentric Intent for Human-Robot Interaction. HEIR pairs human speech, measured gaze, and egocentric video with robot observations and teleoperated navigation-manipulation trajectories, while each session preserves successive episodes, with each request fulfilled through multiple execution subtasks. The captured data, together with human-authored annotations, support the study of intent grounding, execution planning, and task completion within a unified interaction setting. To demonstrate the value of HEIR, we conduct extensive offline experiments to evaluate how models benefit from additional human-centric context across these tasks, together with real-robot experiments that assess execution task completion. HEIR thus provides a valuable resource for studying user-centric robot interaction in naturalistic household environments. Our demo and dataset are available online.

This paper presents Al Ghasali, a computational framework designed to formalize and simulate Islamic jurisprudential (Fiqh) rulings. Building upon recent set theoretic formalizations of al sabr wa al Taqsim that extract minimal operational rules as simple Horn clause logical programs, this work proves that the semantics of closed Fiqh chapters collapse completely to deterministic Finite State Automata (FSA). We establish a formal computational hierarchy, demonstrating that restricting formalization to finite propositional Horn theories guarantees decidability and constant time (O(1)) verdict extraction after offline compilation. The framework formally proves that hierarchical compositions of sub-chapter FSAs preserve this O(1) complexity, and that temporal juristic requirements, such as Tartib (order), are deterministically flattened into static ontological states, preserving the memoryless property of the automaton. To generate human-readable juristic summaries, Al Ghasali incorporates Large Language Models (LLMs) via an architecture where the deterministic FSA strictly controls the probabilistic LLM. Crucially, the paper formulates sufficient design safety conditions for this FSA LLM integration, ensuring strict adherence to the epistemological boundaries of Usul al Fiqh. To neutralize the risk of LLM hallucination, the system employs a Grammar Guided Constrained Decoding mechanism. We formally define the mapping function that dynamically constructs unambiguous right linear grammars from the FSA execution history. The paper mathematically proves that this architecture, augmented by a Bounded Neutral Lexicon and Valence Locking, guarantees the absolute absence of Decisional Hallucination, Juristic Factual Hallucination, and Semantic Inversion reducing the LLM to a pure linguistic transformer of deterministic juristic facts

Many hypotheses compete to explain the successes of knowledge distillation. To help address this, we propose and analyze a mathematical model of distillation, which suggests that distillation's performance comes not from obtaining better models but from easier to optimize landscapes. For generalized linear models trained with stochastic gradient descent, we prove that distillation fits performant student models asymptotically more quickly than non-distilled models. In rank-1 matrix approximation, we characterize conditions on the target matrix under which gradient descent with distillation converges strictly faster than training on the supervised objective. The theory helps delineate the ways distillation provides benefits (i.e., in optimization speed, not in generalization), and experiments on real datasets corroborate the theoretical predictions.

We revisit the problem of estimating $k$ linear regressors with self-selection bias in $n$ dimensions up to error $\varepsilon$ with the maximum self-selection criterion, as introduced by Cherapanamjeri, Daskalakis, Ilyas, and Zampetakis [CDIZ23, STOC]. Our main result is a $\mathrm{poly}(n,k,1/\varepsilon)$ time algorithm for the unknown-index variant of this problem, thereby improving upon the running times of the best known algorithms due to Gaitonde and Mossel [GM24] and Kalavasis, Mehrotra, and Zhou [KMZ26, COLT] with exponential dependence on $k$. Our algorithm succeeds in the presence of correlated noise between regressors, which captures the related setting of max-affine regression. Consequently, we also give the first polynomial-time algorithm for this problem, improving on the prior works of Ghosh, Pananjady, Guntuboyina, and Ramchandran [GPGR22, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory] and Gaitonde and Mossel [GM24] with exponential dependence on $k$. Prior works exhaustively search over a $k$-dimensional subspace spanned by the regressors, using conditional moments of the response to test candidates. In contrast, our algorithm is driven by an improved understanding of the moments of the covariates. We show that, restricting to observations with large response values, the degree-$(\log n)$ Hermite moment of the covariates approximately decomposes as a sum of tensor powers of the regressors. The first step of our algorithm can be viewed as a tensor decomposition algorithm for these implicitly represented high-order tensors, which outputs unit vectors parallel to the regressors. A secondary step based on a simple variant of ordinary least squares extracts estimates for the regressors given these unit vectors. We believe our analytic insight and algorithmic components may have applications to designing efficient algorithms for other latent-variable problems.

Graph-based collaborative filtering learns user and item representations by propagating embeddings over a user--item interaction graph. We investigate a modular, sheaf-inspired scoring extension placed on top of a three-layer LightGCN backbone. The motivation comes from cellular sheaves, where local vector spaces are related by linear restriction maps; here, this idea motivates structured, pair-dependent transformations of user and item embeddings rather than a change to graph propagation. We compare the identity inner-product scorer, diagonal, rank-one low-rank, and full matrix residual scorers, and a parameter-matched residual MLP baseline (\texttt{mlp\_full}) on Amazon-Book, Gowalla, MovieLens-1M, and Yelp2018. We report ranking quality and catalog coverage at cutoffs 10 and 20. The selected structured variants show modest, dataset-dependent changes in ranking quality and sometimes substantial changes in coverage. Our method is inspired by sheaf geometry but does not construct a cellular sheaf or implement sheaf-Laplacian diffusion; the experiments therefore do not establish a causal benefit from sheaf geometry itself.

This document describes open Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) measurement data that were collected from biomedical imaging inspired phantoms with moderate conductivity contrasts. The data were collected with the KIT4 and KIT5 EIT measurement devices at the University of Eastern Finland, and are intended for EIT image reconstruction algorithm development and testing. The data from thoracic imaging inspired cylindrical and chest-shaped phantoms are suitable for 2D algorithms, and the data from an intracerebral hemorrhage imaging inspired head-shaped phantom with resistive skull are suitable for 3D algorithms. In addition to the measurement data, computational meshes and example reconstruction codes are provided and sample reconstructions included.

The use of Large Language Models (LLMs) to simulate social actors has garnered attention for its implications for the epistemic status of discourses generated through such means. This paper considers the more modest question of whether sociological role-playing can serve as a heuristic instrument in the generation of qualitative hypotheses. We take as a case study the development of four divergent fictional characters using a theoretically informed Matrix of Climate Reception. These characters are asked to respond to a series of discourse frames covering two topics: a proposed ban on the sale of new gasoline-powered cars, and the inclusion of climate justice in the school curriculum. We then analyse the 32 model-generated responses for their commonalities, situational differences and divergences from the presuppositions underlying the characters' profiles. The experiment illustrates how LLMs can be used to flesh out theoretical presuppositions into contextual narratives and to propose avenues of further inquiry. It also shows that role-playing can generate considerable similarity between characters and is sensitive to how prompts are constructed, warning against the confusion of discursive coherence with sociological data. Role-playing is argued to be just one of several possible ways to use LLMs for generating hypotheses, with the heuristic specificity of this procedure compared with other methods of direct LLM-based reasoning or with other techniques remaining an open issue. The qualitative laboratory is thus conceived of as a heuristic instrument for provoking reflection and refining questions, not for testing theories with artificial data.

Persian medical natural language processing remains limited by the scarcity of domain-specific resources and insufficient public characterization of their coverage and quality. We present Gaokerena, an openly released suite of Persian medical resources comprising an 85.5-million-word corpus of 101,954 web articles; MF3QA, a 24,000-pair patient-doctor question-answering dataset; 1,878 Iranian medical examination questions (KOPP); 1,089 manually translated medical MMLU questions (FA_MED_MMLU); and approximately 18,000 machine-translated MedMCQA training items filtered by two language-model evaluators. We characterize the resources' composition, orthographic variation, redundancy, topical coverage, privacy indicators, answer-key balance, extraction artefacts, and translation limitations. As application case studies, we adapt Aya-Expanse-8B into Gaokerena-V, trained on the corpus and MF3QA, and Gaokerena-R, developed through preference-based reasoning distillation. On translated medical MMLU, Gaokerena-V achieves 49.31% accuracy under direct prompting, compared with 46.65% for Aya-Expanse-8B; the paired exact McNemar test is statistically inconclusive (p = 0.0502). Gaokerena-R reaches 52.80% using five-sample self-consistency and a verifier, but this higher-compute setting is not directly comparable. Under matched five-sample chain-of-thought self-consistency without a verifier, Gaokerena-R scores 48.58%, versus 46.92% for Aya-Expanse-8B, a non-significant difference (p = 0.190). English evaluation also reveals a substantial performance gap relative to Persian. To our knowledge, Gaokerena provides the first openly released and systematically characterized suite of Persian medical resources alongside generative models built on them. These protocol-specific results do not establish an isolated training advantage or clinical readiness.

Traffic forecasting benchmarks commonly fix the sensor set, although deployed sensing networks change their coverage over time. We present EvoXXLTraffic, a sensor-evolving extension of the XXLTraffic dataset family, with yearly sensor catalogs, persistent station IDs, flow matrices, and geographic graph snapshots across nine California PeMS districts, spanning up to 27 years. The benchmark separates all-sensor forecasting from supervised adaptation to sensors absent from the preceding year. We evaluate 13 baseline adaptations on PEMS04 with five seeds and PEMS05 with three seeds, and seven of them on the other seven districts with three seeds. Each yearly task uses 31 stored days, explicit observation masks, and chronological evaluation. Under the frozen configurations, PECPM has the lowest full-horizon mean MAE on both all-sensor and new-node populations on PEMS04, while Online-AN leads both populations on PEMS05. Among the seven methods run on every district, Online-AN has the lowest all-sensor mean MAE in eight of the nine districts, and Online-NN has the lowest new-node mean MAE in six. A matched control on PEMS05 and PEMS06 finds that training on the evolving catalog changes mean MAE on the sensors present in every 2018-2025 catalog by less than 1% in either direction. Method ordering depends on district, evaluation population, horizon, and metric, and seed variation does not establish statistical significance. The benchmark documents implementation adaptations and uses retrospective geographic graphs, limiting claims about original-paper rankings and prospective deployment. Inherited fixed-sensor gap and hourly/daily tasks provide complementary temporal settings. Code and results: https://github.com/cruiseresearchgroup/TSAS26-EvoXXLTraffic. Data: https://huggingface.co/datasets/yind7/EvoXXLTraffic.

Oral exams are compelling because (1) students can be asked to provide their reasoning for an answer and (2) their interactive nature permits follow-up questions to resolve ambiguous answers. But oral exams scale poorly. In this paper, we present scalable conversational assessment, an LLM-based system that conducts interactive text-based conversations with students to assess their ability to make and support an argument. We use a two-agent architecture to separate concerns and reduce the likelihood that answers are leaked to the student: the interviewer interacts directly with the student, but only receives guidance about the next question to ask the student; the hidden evaluator knows the goals of the whole activity, tracks the student's progress using a rubric, and guides the interviewer on when to follow-up on the current question or proceed to the next question. The system was first tested using a collection of simulated students with LLM personas of a particular ability level or adversarial tactic (e.g., answer-extractors, prompt-injectors, confident fabricators). A novel element of this evaluation was that it required the use of a fictional assessment topic to prevent personas that shouldn't have information from using knowledge present in the LLM's pre-training. The system was also deployed in a small, elective AI literacy course in both formative and summative contexts. Through manual and post-facto AI review of the transcripts we identified opportunities to improve the follow-up question generation and ensure that grading only credited ideas that the student (and not the interviewer) contributed.

We present the first method to directly use a learned continuous Lagrangian to forecast the dynamics of systems governed by partial differential equations, exploiting the inherent conservative structure to achieve stable long-range predictions. We develop an integrator that minimizes the squared Euler-Lagrange residual via a discretization-agnostic, structure-preserving construction on local space-time patches. Different from integrators for analytical models, integrators for learned models should decouple model error (phase error) from integration error (conservation error). By minimizing the residual locally on overlapping patches, we bypass the global implicit solve inherent to fixed discretizations, which slows time- and space-stepping and complicates learning. Our method scales linearly with domain size via Jacobi iteration, and places no structural requirements on the learned network, allowing it to be coupled with existing physics-guided machine learning (ML) methods. We validate our approach on a learned representation of a double pendulum, a one-dimensional wave equation, and a two-dimensional wave equation. Our method achieves long-horizon predictions with error comparable to classical symplectic methods while generalizing to spatially varying dynamics and arbitrary boundary conditions without retraining.

Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit strong informal mathematical reasoning but struggle to generate mechanically verifiable proofs in formal languages like Lean. We present LEAP, an agentic framework that enables general-purpose foundation models to achieve state-of-the-art performance on automated formal theorem proving. LEAP leverages foundation model capabilities, such as informal reasoning, instruction following, and iterative self-refinement. By decomposing complex problems into smaller units, the system bridges formal proof construction with informal blueprints through continuous interaction with the Lean compiler. To provide a rigorous evaluation beyond increasingly saturated benchmarks, we introduce Lean-IMO-Bench, a benchmark of IMO-style problems formalized in Lean, with short statements yet highly non-routine and multi-step proofs across a wide range of difficulty levels. Empirically, on the latest 2025 Putnam Competition, an annual mathematics competition for undergraduate students in North America, LEAP solves all 12 problems, matching recent breakthroughs by frontier formal mathematical models. On Lean-IMO-Bench, LEAP boosts the one-shot formal solve rate of general-purpose LLMs from below 10% to 70%, notably surpassing the 48% benchmark set by a specialized, gold-medal-caliber IMO system. Furthermore, we demonstrate LEAP's research-level utility by autonomously formalizing complex proofs for open combinatorial challenges, including a verified proof for a key subproblem in Knuth's Hamiltonian decomposition of even-order Cayley graphs.

We study regret minimization in episodic Adversarial Markov Decision Processes (AMDPs) with unknown transitions and bandit feedback. In tabular AMDPs with $S$ states, $A$ actions, and horizon $H$, the best known $K$-episode regret is $\tilde O(HS\sqrt{AK})$, whose $\sqrt S$ gap to the $Ω(H\sqrt{SAK})$ lower bound has long remained open. In linear AMDPs with $d$-dimensional features, after a five-year line of improvements starting from $K^{14/15}$, computationally efficient algorithms without a simulator or exploratory assumptions still only attain $\tilde O(K^{3/4})$ regret. A common challenge in both settings is to estimate the Q-function of a changing policy: past data comes from earlier policies that differ from (and are correlated with) the current one, while freezing the policy for future episodes worsens the dependency on $K$. We instead propose a general technique called introduced feedback delays: we estimate the Q-function of the policy using future episodes while still updating the policy, as if the feedback were delayed. While feedback delays are usually an obstacle imposed by the environment, here they are introduced voluntarily and, perhaps surprisingly, come at no extra cost. We develop Geometric Resampling with Rejection (GRR) to account for policy changes during the delay, and threshold the visitation probabilities to avoid long delays on rarely visited state-action pairs. With this unified technique, our policy optimization algorithms achieve, with high probability, $\tilde O(\text{poly}(H)\sqrt{SAK})$ regret in tabular AMDPs, resolving the open problem; and $\tilde O(\text{poly}(d,H)\sqrt K)$ regret in linear AMDPs, giving the first efficient algorithm optimal in $K$. They also naturally extend to delayed AMDPs with a total feedback delay $\mathfrak D$, yielding the first bounds optimal in $S$ and $\mathfrak D$ (tabular) and in $K$ and $\mathfrak D$ (linear).

Transformer architectures exhibit cross-layer redundancies, yet post-training compression pipelines typically optimize layers in isolation or rely on heuristic grouping strategies that disregard layer-specific activation geometries. We introduce a principled, training-free framework that sequentially optimizes cross-layer weight pairings and shared-dictionary factorizations. Rather than forcing weights of adjacent layers to share a basis or heuristically merging activation statistics, our approach identifies structurally compatible projections and learns a shared representation that better preserves each layer's distinct calibration geometry. Coupled with structured sparsity, this yields highly efficient weight decompositions without sacrificing functional fidelity. Across diverse architectures, scales, and modalities, our method achieves state-of-the-art results, consistently outperforming independent structured weight decompositions and alternative pairwise weight factorizations, which operate under heuristic grouping strategies. By replacing heuristic engineering strategies with a convergent, optimization-driven pipeline, we establish a theoretically grounded foundation for scalable, transformer compression across different modalities.

Multi-robot systems face the challenge of efficiently allocating teams of heterogeneous robots to tasks. The task allocation problem is complicated by collaborative interactions between robots where teams of robots develop emergent capabilities that enable them to complete tasks that would be inefficient or impossible for individual robots. To address these challenges, we present an iterative clustering algorithm for collaborative task allocation in heterogeneous multi-robot systems. This approach partitions the computationally intractable global optimization problem into smaller, tractable subproblems by iteratively forming clusters of robots and tasks, then optimizing assignments within each cluster. By ensuring robots remain clustered with their currently assigned tasks, we guarantee monotonic improvement in overall utility with each iteration. We analyze the convergence of the algorithm and characterize how cluster size constraints determine which suboptimal assignments could trap the algorithm. In simulation, iterative clustering consistently outperforms simulated annealing, and a group-based auction in both computation time and solution quality, and outperforms a hedonic game approach in solution quality.

Deep neural networks for image processing are increasingly deployed on resource-constrained edge devices such as drones, medical systems, and smartphones, where limited computational resources and memory bandwidth pose significant challenges for efficient inference. Pruning during training often produces highly sparse convolutional kernels, offering the potential to significantly reduce computation and memory requirements. However, exploiting this sparsity efficiently at runtime remains challenging due to irregular memory access patterns and workload imbalance across processing elements. In this work, we investigate the standard convolution with sparse weights and analyze its performance characteristics through roofline analysis, showing that a 3 x 3 sparse convolution achieves an arithmetic intensity of approximately 10 FLOP/byte compared to roughly 96 FLOP/byte for its dense counterpart. We propose techniques for an efficient sparse convolution at high sparsities. Preliminary results demonstrate that our approach achieves upto 1.65x speedup as compared to dense convolution on NVIDIA A100 and upto 1.52x on NVIDIA Jetson Nano (Tegra X1) , motivating further exploration of direct convolution as a practical path to efficient sparse inference on modern accelerators/edge devices.

Stochastic optimization theory often assumes that gradient noise has uniformly bounded variance. However, this assumption can be inadequate even in simple settings; e.g., it does not hold for linear least squares regression. The Blum-Gladyshev ($\mathsf{BG}$-0) noise model instead allows the stochastic gradient variance to grow quadratically with the distance from the initialization and has recently been identified as the weakest known viable variance assumption. We study nonconvex stochastic optimization under $\mathsf{BG}$-0 noise and prove that normalized momentum converges with one stochastic gradient per iteration, reaching an $\varepsilon$-stationary point with the optimal $O(\varepsilon^{-6})$ complexity. We then show that, under mean-square smoothness, a variance-reduced normalized STORM method achieves the minimax optimal complexity of $O(\varepsilon^{-4})$. We further extend our analysis to the symmetric generalized smoothness framework, which captures objectives whose local curvature can scale with the gradient norm. To our knowledge, these are the first convergence guarantees for normalized methods in nonconvex stochastic optimization under $\mathsf{BG}$-0 noise without bounded domains.

Variability is an inherent characteristic of modern GPU systems, arising from a combination of process variation, dynamic environmental conditions, and power management decisions. Prior work has characterized inter-GPU variability and found consistent performance differences across GPUs. However, we observe that modern workloads, particularly large language models (LLMs), exhibit significant intra-GPU variability. Their short-running kernels interact poorly with the coarse granularity of dynamic power management mechanisms, leading to unpredictable performance. A key source of this intra-GPU transient variability is power excursions, also referred to as electrical design power peaks (EDP$_{p}$), where power temporarily exceeds the GPU's rated power limits. While power management mechanisms are designed to ensure reliable operation despite the presence of EDP$_{p}$ sustained power peaks cause throttling that detrimentally impacts overall application performance. To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first to characterize the magnitude and frequency of EDP$_{p}$, showing that frequent, significant power overshoots are especially common in ML workloads, which combine high power draw, short kernels, and rapidly changing compute demands. To address this, we design and leverage hardware and firmware mechanisms to provide consistent power management behavior that reduces intra-GPU variability due to EDP$_{p}$ and improves overall performance. We evaluate our techniques across a range of popular workloads. Our approach improves performance by 3-12% over state-of-the-art GPU power management and comes within 3% of an oracular solution.

Most multimodal sentiment analysis algorithms focus on point-wise regression. While straightforward, it uses absolute values to represent subjective sentiment and overlooks the ordinal nature of sentiment, resulting in unstable predictions and poor correlation. Inspired by the way humans perceive sentiment, pair-wise ordinal learning frameworks emerged to address this gap, capturing relative order by learning from comparisons. However, they have two limitations: First, they assign uniform importance to all pairs, failing to adaptively focus on hard-to-rank samples. Second, they employ static ranking margins, which fail to reflect the varying semantic distances between sentiment groups. To address this, we propose a Group-wise Ranking and Calibration Framework (GRCF) that introduces the Adaptive Error-weighting and Dynamic Margin mechanism, which resolves these limitations by simultaneously preserving the relative ordinal structure and ensuring absolute score calibration. Specifically, Stage 1 introduces a Group-aware Ranking Loss to build a fine-grained ordinal structure by assigning higher optimization priority to confusable pairs. Stage 2 then employs an MAE-driven objective to align the prediction magnitudes. To validate its generalizability, we extend GRCF to classification tasks, including Multimodal Humor and Sarcasm Detection. It achieves state-of-the-art performance on regression datasets while also showing strong generalizability in classification tasks.

Low-depth syndrome extraction for Calderbank-Shor-Steane (CSS) quantum low-density parity-check codes can be formulated as a proper ordered edge-coloring problem subject to quantum parity constraints. A proper edge-coloring of the CSS Tanner graph ensures that each data or ancilla qubit participates in at most one two-qubit gate per layer, but does not guarantee a valid interleaving of the X- and Z-check measurements as for every overlapping X/Z check pair, the number of shared data qubits on which the X interaction precedes the Z interaction must be even. The minimum number of colors in a proper ordered edge-coloring satisfying the quantum parity constraints equals the minimum two-qubit depth when each stabilizer check is measured with a single ancilla. We introduce local automorphism-aware syndrome compilation (LocalASC), which reduces the constraint system to edge-orbit variables under a subgroup of the Tanner graph automorphisms and lifts each feasible orbit assignment to the full graph. Although the $6$-layer degree lower bound is unattainable for the published weight-$6$ IBM bivariate bicycle codes, we show that this is not universal among two-block CSS codes. Among code instances for which the maximum check weight equals the maximum Tanner graph degree, LocalASC finds depth-optimal syndrome-extraction schedules for several two-block CSS codes with odd component weights, including instances with unequal odd weights. We also obtain lower-bound-saturating syndrome-extraction schedules for several quantum Tanner codes satisfying the same degree condition. To obtain the subgroups used by LocalASC without computing the full automorphism group of the Tanner graph, we construct translation subgroups for two-block group-algebra CSS codes over abelian groups. For quantum Tanner codes, we give conditions under which square-complex symmetries extend to Tanner graph automorphisms.

Automatic differentiation has enabled rapid progress on continuous-variable mechanical design problems, but gradient-based optimization still struggles with discrete variables. The standard approach is to optimize using a continuous relaxation of the choices, then commit to the nearest discrete design at the end. Why this procedure selects unfavorable basins is poorly understood. Here, we introduce a practical, interpretable design problem inspired by origami, in which automatic differentiation is used to design shapes with a target functional behavior. Each origami sheet has a fixed geometry, and a bilevel optimization framework tunes which one of four discrete hinge types to place at each fold. Baseline gradient-based design settles into basins with a large discretization gap: relaxed optimization solves 97% of runs, but the final, discrete solutions succeed only half the time. We find that the gap can be relieved with a surprisingly simple modification. An initialization prior uniformly biased toward the stiff, flat hinge option boosts the final solve fraction from 49% to 69%. Applying the prior adds no additional compute and leaves the optimization process unchanged. Compared to the baseline, sheets produced with the prior have greater geometric compatibility and mechanical stiffness. Directly penalizing frustration and floppiness in the outer loss function produces an even greater improvement than the prior does, raising the solve fraction to 78% and indicating that these properties help distinguish the unfavorable basins. Our results demonstrate that loss landscapes for mechanical design can have physically meaningful basins that are not robust to discretization and cause solves to fail. Targeting these basins' physical signatures, even with just an initialization bias, helps avoid them.

We study AI alignment through the lens of law-and-economics models of deterrence and enforcement. In these models, misconduct is not treated as an external failure, but as a strategic response to incentives: an actor weighs the gain from violation against the probability of detection and the severity of punishment. We argue that the same logic arises naturally in agentic AI pipelines. A solver may benefit from producing a persuasive but incorrect answer, hiding uncertainty, or exploiting spurious shortcuts, while an auditor or verifier must decide whether costly monitoring is worthwhile. Alignment is therefore a fixed-point problem: stronger penalties may deter solver misbehavior, but they can also reduce the auditor's incentive to inspect, since auditing then mainly incurs cost on a population that appears increasingly aligned. This perspective also changes what should count as a post-training signal. Standard feedback often attaches reward to the final answer alone, but a solver-auditor pipeline exposes the full correction event: whether the solver erred, whether the auditor inspected, whether the error was caught, and whether oversight incentives remained active. We formalize this interaction in a two-agent model in which a principal chooses rewards over joint correction outcomes, inducing both solver behavior and auditor monitoring. Reward design is therefore a bilevel optimization problem: rewards are judged not by their immediate semantic meaning, but by the behavioral equilibrium they induce. We propose a bandit-based outer-loop procedure for searching over reward profiles using noisy interaction feedback. Experiments on an LLM coding pipeline show that adaptive reward profiles can maintain useful oversight pressure and improve principal-aligned outcomes relative to static hand-designed rewards, including a substantial reduction in hallucinated incorrect attempts.

Distribution matching distillation (DMD) has emerged as a leading paradigm for distilling diffusion models into few-step students, where an auxiliary fake score model tracks the student's distribution and the discrepancy between the teacher and fake predictions drives the student toward the teacher. In multi-step distillation, although only the student's final output is delivered, existing methods train the fake model on intermediate states or across all denoising steps. Consequently, the student's update signal becomes entangled with intermediate distributions, which can distort the matching direction and remain nonzero even after the student's final outputs already match the teacher distribution. To resolve this mismatch, we propose Endpoint Distribution Matching Distillation (eDMD), which trains a single shared fake model exclusively on the student's final outputs and uses it to correct every denoising step. Our theoretical analysis proves that this endpoint reference guarantees that the distribution matching term vanishes if and only if the student's final output distribution matches the teacher's, regardless of intermediate distributions. Beyond the fake reference, we further strengthen teacher supervision through a precise teacher (PT) that replaces single-step guided predictions with short multi-step trajectories on the final noise interval, paired with a calibrated query density for intermediate steps. Experiments on SD3-Medium, FLUX.2-klein (4B and 9B), and Qwen-Image-2.1 demonstrate that eDMD consistently outperforms existing distribution matching methods for 4-step generation.