跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.17214 · v1

Introducing Feedback Delays to Non-Delayed Adversarial MDPs: Optimal $\sqrt S$ and $\sqrt K$ Dependencies in Tabular and Linear AMDPs

在非延迟对抗性MDP中引入反馈延迟:表格与线性AMDP中的最优√S和√K依赖

首次提交 2026-11-13 02:10
版本更新 2026-11-13 02:10
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:15
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

We study regret minimization in episodic Adversarial Markov Decision Processes (AMDPs) with unknown transitions and bandit feedback. In tabular AMDPs with SS states, AA actions, and horizon HH, the best known KK-episode regret is O~(HSAK)\tilde O(HS\sqrt{AK}), whose S\sqrt S gap to the Ω(HSAK)Ω(H\sqrt{SAK}) lower bound has long remained open. In linear AMDPs with dd-dimensional features, after a five-year line of improvements starting from K14/15K^{14/15}, computationally efficient algorithms without a simulator or exploratory assumptions still only attain O~(K3/4)\tilde O(K^{3/4}) regret. A common challenge in both settings is to estimate the Q-function of a changing policy: past data comes from earlier policies that differ from (and are correlated with) the current one, while freezing the policy for future episodes worsens the dependency on KK. We instead propose a general technique called introduced feedback delays: we estimate the Q-function of the policy using future episodes while still updating the policy, as if the feedback were delayed. While feedback delays are usually an obstacle imposed by the environment, here they are introduced voluntarily and, perhaps surprisingly, come at no extra cost. We develop Geometric Resampling with Rejection (GRR) to account for policy changes during the delay, and threshold the visitation probabilities to avoid long delays on rarely visited state-action pairs. With this unified technique, our policy optimization algorithms achieve, with high probability, O~(poly(H)SAK)\tilde O(\text{poly}(H)\sqrt{SAK}) regret in tabular AMDPs, resolving the open problem; and O~(poly(d,H)K)\tilde O(\text{poly}(d,H)\sqrt K) regret in linear AMDPs, giving the first efficient algorithm optimal in KK. They also naturally extend to delayed AMDPs with a total feedback delay D\mathfrak D, yielding the first bounds optimal in SS and D\mathfrak D (tabular) and in KK and D\mathfrak D (linear).

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

作者提出主动引入反馈延迟的统一技术,在表格和线性对抗性MDP中分别达到最优的√S和√K遗憾依赖。

正在读取账号与研究记录…

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-13 02:10 · 最新观测版本

Introducing Feedback Delays to Non-Delayed Adversarial MDPs: Optimal $\sqrt S$ and $\sqrt K$ Dependencies in Tabular and Linear AMDPs

We study regret minimization in episodic Adversarial Markov Decision Processes (AMDPs) with unknown transitions and bandit feedback. In tabular AMDPs with SS states, AA actions, and horizon HH, the best known KK-episode regret is O~(HSAK)\tilde O(HS\sqrt{AK}), whose S\sqrt S gap to the Ω(HSAK)Ω(H\sqrt{SAK}) lower bound has long remained open. In linear AMDPs with dd-dimensional features, after a five-year line of improvements starting from K14/15K^{14/15}, computationally efficient algorithms without a simulator or exploratory assumptions still only attain O~(K3/4)\tilde O(K^{3/4}) regret. A common challenge in both settings is to estimate the Q-function of a changing policy: past data comes from earlier policies that differ from (and are correlated with) the current one, while freezing the policy for future episodes worsens the dependency on KK. We instead propose a general technique called introduced feedback delays: we estimate the Q-function of the policy using future episodes while still updating the policy, as if the feedback were delayed. While feedback delays are usually an obstacle imposed by the environment, here they are introduced voluntarily and, perhaps surprisingly, come at no extra cost. We develop Geometric Resampling with Rejection (GRR) to account for policy changes during the delay, and threshold the visitation probabilities to avoid long delays on rarely visited state-action pairs. With this unified technique, our policy optimization algorithms achieve, with high probability, O~(poly(H)SAK)\tilde O(\text{poly}(H)\sqrt{SAK}) regret in tabular AMDPs, resolving the open problem; and O~(poly(d,H)K)\tilde O(\text{poly}(d,H)\sqrt K) regret in linear AMDPs, giving the first efficient algorithm optimal in KK. They also naturally extend to delayed AMDPs with a total feedback delay D\mathfrak D, yielding the first bounds optimal in SS and D\mathfrak D (tabular) and in KK and D\mathfrak D (linear).

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗