跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+2150新增论文
+1707其中 AI 相关
+146已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-11 11:05 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-11 11:05各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-10 11:58 — 2026-11-11 11:58(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-11 11:05最近发现新增版本:2026-11-11 11:05库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,234 已收录论文17,987 AI 相关5,768 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-11 11:04(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.40619

来自时间线的证词:基于证据的时间临床假设显著性检验

Testimony from Timelines: Evidence-Grounded Significance Testing of Temporal Clinical Hypotheses

Chengyang He, Wenlong Zhang, Koduvayur Subbalakshmi, Ping Wang

AI 速读 基于摘要

提出STRATA基准和ART范式,对临床时间假设的显著性检验过程进行逐步评分,揭示模型主要失败于证据选择而非结论。

cs.CL · cs.IR

查看原文摘要

Ask a language model whether sales tend to dip after a product recall, or whether one side effect tends to follow another after a vaccine, and it answers in a fluent sentence that reads like a finding, with no test behind it. Assertions about how events unfold across many cases fill the Web, and each is a temporal hypothesis that only a significance test over the right records can settle. The verifier must specify the null, select the test and decide which records bear on the hypothesis, and any of these choices can go wrong while the conclusion still comes out right. Yet benchmarks for language-model data analysis grade only the conclusion, with the relevant data handed over. We study the problem in health, where a wrong verdict is costly, and present STRATA, a benchmark that grades every decision on the way to a verdict: 8,735 hypotheses over the clinical timelines of vaccine adverse-event reports, with gold plans, evidence sets, p-values and verdicts derived under a released codebook and reproduced by a deterministic oracle. We also propose ART (articulate, retrieve, test), a staged paradigm that exposes each decision as an inspectable output. Extensive experiments with five model configurations show that systems fail mostly at choosing which records count, a verdict-evidence gap that accuracy alone conceals. ART closes most of this gap and brings a 31B open model to within 0.01 of the frontier models under the same paradigm; the frontier models succeed once given the codebook.

版本更新 · v3arXiv:1912.04977Google Research

联邦学习的进展与开放问题

Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning

Peter Kairouz, H. Brendan McMahan, Brendan Avent, Aurélien Bellet, Mehdi Bennis, Arjun Nitin Bhagoji, Kallista Bonawitz, Zachary Charles 等 59 位作者

AI 速读 基于摘要

一篇综述性论文,梳理联邦学习的研究进展并系统列出开放问题与挑战。

cs.LG · cs.CR · stat.ML

查看原文摘要

Federated learning (FL) is a machine learning setting where many clients (e.g. mobile devices or whole organizations) collaboratively train a model under the orchestration of a central server (e.g. service provider), while keeping the training data decentralized. FL embodies the principles of focused data collection and minimization, and can mitigate many of the systemic privacy risks and costs resulting from traditional, centralized machine learning and data science approaches. Motivated by the explosive growth in FL research, this paper discusses recent advances and presents an extensive collection of open problems and challenges.