跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+586新增论文
+453其中 AI 相关
+91已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-13 11:13 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-13 11:12各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-12 14:00 — 2026-11-13 14:00(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-13 11:13最近发现新增版本:2026-11-13 11:12库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 22:55

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

22,261 已收录论文18,776 AI 相关6,286 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-13 11:11(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.08433

MedGraph:用图记忆维护长期医疗对话中的患者状态

MedGraph: Maintaining Patient State with Graph Memory for Long-Term Medical Dialogue

Donghua Zhang, Zizheng Wang, Ze Dong, Yiding Feng, Siyu Qian

AI 速读 基于摘要

作者提出面向长期医疗对话的图记忆系统 MedGraph,针对检索证据过时、混入他人健康事实、缺少安全事实三类错误,并在自建基准 MedMemoryBench 上报告了优于五个基线的总体准确率。

cs.CL · cs.AI

查看原文摘要

LLM-based medical assistants that follow a patient across visits need a memory that keeps the patient's clinical state correct as it changes. We examine the errors of five memory systems on longitudinal medical dialogue and find three recurring causes: the retrieved evidence gives an outdated state, includes another person's health facts, or lacks a safety fact the answer depends on. We present MedGraph, a graph memory built for these three cases. Construction extracts dated facts from each session, attributes each fact to the person it describes, and links medication, diagnosis, and measurement records into chains that keep earlier states. Retrieval ranks the patient's chains as units, reads each chain at the time the question asks about, and adds the original dialogue text; a patient profile lists every recorded safety fact with every question. On MedMemoryBench, MedGraph has the highest overall accuracy with both a GPT and a Qwen backbone, 10.5 and 10.4 points above the strongest of five baselines, with efficient memory construction and answering in the GPT setting.

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.08231

从扭曲事实到失控智能体:LLM 能否可靠检测多维幻觉?

From Twisted Facts to Rogue Agents: Can LLMs Reliably Detect Multi-Dimensional Hallucinations?

Hanyu Qiu, Ze Liu, Zhe Zhao, Kuang Xiong, Blaze Chen, Zhenxiang Yan, Renfen Hu

AI 速读 基于摘要

作者提出双语大规模基准 HaluCheck,用于评估 LLM 对文本事实幻觉与智能体轨迹忠实性幻觉的检测、定位和纠正能力。

cs.CL

查看原文摘要

Large language models (LLMs) are widely used for information access, content production, and agent-based task execution, but their outputs remain vulnerable to subtle, high-risk hallucinations. To systematically evaluate and advance post-generation hallucination detection, we introduce HaluCheck, a large-scale, bilingual benchmark comprising over 42k instances spanning both factual hallucinations in text and faithfulness hallucinations in agent trajectories. HaluCheck features fine-grained, multi-level annotations for detection, localization, and correction, covering different tasks and perturbation degrees. Experiments on fourteen LLMs reveal that, while models show basic sample-level detection ability, they struggle with fine-grained localization, correction, and agent hallucination detection. Further analysis demonstrates that thinking, web search, and supervised fine-tuning each offer partial improvements, but none fully solve the problem. HaluCheck thus provides a solid basis for benchmarking and diagnosing LLM reliability across text and agent scenarios.