跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文，不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科，以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词，把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描：2026-11-09 07:12 · 全站最近入库：2026-11-08 06:02各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-08 09:35 — 2026-11-09 09:35（北京时间） · 点击数字查看对应简报；AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查：2026-11-09 07:12最近发现新增版本：2026-11-08 06:02库内论文最新更新时间：2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常；新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,057 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

研究日报 / 周报 →按信源浏览 →

时间范围跟随排序：版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常，查看状态 →

找到 5,059 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-09 07:10（北京时间）
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.02807

Creating Hybrid Interactive Narrative Systems with LLM: From Formal Description to Evaluation

Jules Clerc, Domitile Lourdeaux, Mohamed Sallak, Marc Ravaine

原文摘要

Interactive narratives let users shape a story while an Experience Manager (EM) keeps it coherent, balancing player freedom against authorial control. Large Language Models now enable a new generation of hybrid EMs, which combine run-time generation from free-text input with symbolic narrative control. However, their heterogeneity makes them hard to compare: A manager's behaviour is generally tied to the unique and specific scenario in which it operates, and much of its decision-making takes place outside of any explicit and verifiable structure. We address this with an LLM-based narrative platform whose managers are interchangeable modules operating over a shared symbolic world model of facts, operations, and goals. Because every applied operation carries explicit preconditions and effects, each session can be analysed as a plan through a common state-transition representation and evaluated, independently of how the manager works internally, with shared indicators of four properties: player agency, EM controllability, author intent, and robustness. We implement three contrasting managers, based respectively on open generation, Monte Carlo repair, and autonomous characters, and compare them through functional analysis on an interactive Little Red Riding Hood scenario. The results show that no manager dominates on every property, giving authors and EM designers a concrete basis to select a manager according to their priorities.

cs.AI · cs.CL · cs.HC

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.02797

SelfImprove-Bench: Evaluating Generalization in Self-Improving Agents

Bangrui Xu, Jie Yang, Sidi Chen, Xuanhe Zhou, Jiantao Qiu, Qianyu Yang, Zijie Wang, Fan Wu 等 9 位作者

原文摘要

Recursively self-improving (RSI) systems are increasingly viewed as a promising means of accelerating progress toward artificial general intelligence. They aim to autonomously improve their capabilities by refining their working pipelines and recursively improving the strategies that guide subsequent refinements, with gains generalizing to unseen scenarios.However, existing evaluations lack reliable metrics to distinguish capability gains from scenario fitting, sustainable and extensible protocols for unseen tasks and difficulties, and fine-grained attribution of improvement to evolution traces. To this end, we propose SelfImprove-Bench,an RSI evaluation framework that organizes tasks into three primary capabilities (i.e., Exploring, Planning, Reasoning) as scenarios for guiding model evolution. We instantiated the tasks on games for controllability and reproducibility, and pairs them with scalable generation and orchestration driven by task templates and difficulty coefficients. Beyond task-level scores, SelfImprove-Bench organizes evaluation into generalization ladder levels G0 to G4 that measure how far gains transfer from training conditions. Experiments reveal that the evolutionary gains of existing RSI methods are inconsistent across generalization levels.

cs.AI · cs.CL · cs.LG · cs.MA

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.02779

Stop Handcrafting Your Engine! GenDB-V: Towards AI-Generated and Formally Verified Database Systems

Jiale Lao, Immanuel Trummer

原文摘要

For over 50 years, the database community has developed a wide range of successful engines to answer two fundamental questions: how can database systems run faster, and how can we ensure their correctness? Experience with these engines shows that performance depends on hardware and workloads. As both change over time, we repeatedly redesign and rebuild database systems, a time-consuming and expensive process. Correctness remains another long-standing challenge: recent studies continue to uncover wrong-answer bugs even in mature database engines, despite years of development and testing. To address these, we present GenDB-V, a system that enables AI agents to synthesize database engines specialized to hardware and workloads for performance, and formally verified for correctness. GenDB-V supports specialized implementations of SQL templates and general-purpose engines that accept any query within a supported SQL subset. First, we develop SQLSpec to formalize SQL semantics and deterministically construct fixed, implementation-agnostic synthesis targets. Second, we enable joint synthesis of fast code and formal proofs through storage--execution co-optimization, performance-first exploration, and three-layer modular proofs that bridge low-level execution to SQLSpec semantics. Third, we verify the synthesized code and proofs against the fixed synthesis targets in an isolated pipeline, proving SQL correctness and program safety. We evaluate GenDB-V on TPC-H and SEC-EDGAR. For verified template implementations, GenDB-V achieves geometric-mean speedups of 22.0-61.3x over DuckDB and Umbra. For a verified general-purpose engine, GenDB-V also achieves speedups of 1.27-3.4x on TPC-H. GenDB-V also achieves better performance than a testing-based LLM synthesis method, while our audit and tests expose incorrect answers in that method's implementations for 16 of 28 templates.

cs.DB · cs.AI · cs.CL · cs.LG

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2605.18549

Monitoring the Internal Monologue: Probe Trajectories Reveal Reasoning Dynamics

Maciej Chrabaszcz, Aleksander Szymczyk, Marcin Sendera, Tomasz Trzcinski, Sebastian Cygert

原文摘要

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) introduce new opportunities for safety monitoring through their Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning. However, CoT is not always faithful to the model's final output, undermining its reliability as a monitoring tool. To address this, we investigate the hidden representations of LRMs to determine whether future behavior can be predicted from prompt and CoT representations. By evaluating a probe at each generated token, we construct a probe trajectory, the continuous evolution of a concept's probability across the reasoning process. To characterize these temporal dynamics, we extract signal-processing features that capture volatility, trend, and steady-state behavior. We find that trajectory features help precisely where the static probe is weakest, adding 21.7 AUROC points on average, and improving in every such case where that probe falls below 70. We also present two methodological insights. First, template-based training data achieves near-parity with dynamically generated model responses, eliminating the need for a costly initial inference and labeling. Second, the use of a pooling operation is necessary: last-token methods achieve poor performance, whereas average and max pooling achieve 78.5% to 97.4% AUROC and yield stable probe trajectories. Across seven reasoning models from three families and six evaluation datasets, we find probe trajectories to be a promising signal for monitoring model behavior. Warning: This article contains potentially harmful content.

cs.CL · cs.CR

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2601.13217

Beyond Single-shot Writing: Deep Research Agents are Unreliable at Multi-turn Report Revision

Bingsen Chen, Boyan Li, Ping Nie, Yuyu Zhang, Xi Ye, Chen Zhao

原文摘要

Existing benchmarks for Deep Research Agents (DRAs) treat report generation as a single-shot writing task, which fundamentally diverges from how human researchers iteratively draft and revise reports via self-reflection or peer feedback. Whether DRAs can reliably revise reports with user feedback remains unexplored. We introduce Mr Dre, an evaluation suite that establishes multi-turn report revision as a new evaluation axis for DRAs. Mr Dre consists of (1) a unified long-form report evaluation protocol spanning comprehensiveness, factuality, and presentation, and (2) a human-verified feedback simulation pipeline for multi-turn revision. Our analysis of five diverse DRAs reveals a critical limitation: while agents can address most user feedback, they also regress on 16-28% of previously covered content and citation quality. Over multiple revision turns, even the best-performing agents leave significant headroom, as they continue to disrupt content outside the feedback's scope and fail to preserve earlier edits. We further show that these issues are not easily resolvable through inference-time fixes such as prompt engineering and a dedicated subagent for report revision.

cs.CL · cs.AI

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.02766

EffComp: Efficient Prompt Compression via Hybrid Reinforcement & Supervised Learning

Romtham Tungsununtham, Piyawat Lertvittayakumjorn, Atiwong Suchato, Peerapon Vateekul

原文摘要

Prompt compression is aimed at reducing input prompt lengths to enable cheaper, faster, and potentially higher-quality LLM predictions. However, existing prompt compression methods are often limited by modest compression gains, a risk of hallucination, and/or high compression latency. We propose EffComp, an Efficient prompt Compression framework for RAG-based question answering (QA). EffComp employs BERT-style document reranker and sentence selector models to allow fast extractive prompt compression at the sentence level. Its extractive nature prevents hallucinations in the compressed prompts. Additionally, the training process using a hybrid reinforcement and supervised learning approach is designed to optimize the compression ratio while preserving LLM accuracy. Experiments on various QA datasets demonstrate that EffComp outperforms state-of-the-art prompt compression methods achieving the best trade-off between compression ratio and accuracy with minimal latency. This makes it practical for real-world applications.

cs.CL

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.02710

MicroMouse: Masking Harmful Supervision in Long CoT via Relative Potential

Xiaowei Zhu, Hengzhu Tang, Zhenyu Zhang, Shuohuan Wang, Yubing Ren, Yanan Cao

原文摘要

Even successful long CoTs may contain harmful supervision, motivating the need for methods that can automatically identify and mask such signals during SFT. Inspired by the MicroMouse maze-solving process, we view a long CoT as a search trajectory from the input problem toward the target answer. This perspective motivates maintaining a goal-relative measure, analogous to a MicroMouse's spatial coordinates, to quantify how close the current reasoning state is to the target answer. Building on this perspective, we propose MicroMouse, an automated selective-SFT framework for masking harmful supervision in long CoTs. In MicroMouse we introduce a Relative Potential (REP) to measure how closely each reasoning state supports the gold answer. Unlike the perplexity of the gold answer alone, REP measures relative support by contrasting the gold answer with a matched foil. This contrast cancels likelihood variations shared by the pair, yielding a more stable signal of progress toward the target answer. By tracking the REP trajectory, MicroMouse identifies consecutive potential decreases as erroneous exploration and post-peak reasoning as redundant wandering, and masks these harmful supervision during SFT. Extensive experiments across multiple student model scales and reasoning benchmarks show that MicroMouse consistently outperforms Full-CoT SFT and existing selective-SFT baselines, yielding average relative gains of 5.5% in greedy accuracy and 2.6% in Pass@1 relative to Full-CoT SFT. Meanwhile, MicroMouse improves reasoning efficiency by reducing average output length by 8.8%, while identifying harmful supervision in only 1.7 seconds per long CoT on average.

cs.CL

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2610.32955

Measure Before You Train: Typed Decision Models vs. a Classical Baseline vs. a Generative LLM for Routing a Personal Multilingual Inbox

Federico Lucca

原文摘要

Personal email agents decide, for every incoming message, its type and urgency and whether to draft a reply, create a task or ignore it. In production these decisions are delegated to a generative LLM or to rules, and their error rate is rarely measured. We describe Foyer, a self-hosted personal inbox agent, and a measurement protocol (stratified sampling, a frozen snapshot of the model input, thread-grouped splits, secret redaction, and human labels collected in the agent's own review loop) that produces ground truth before any training. On 231 real emails in Italian and English we compare the production rules, a TF-IDF + logistic-regression baseline, five typed decision models, local and hosted (Tev1, Nimble, Jev), and three hosted generative LLMs. Four results. First, the production rules for message type score 28% against a 58% majority class. Second, with about two hundred labels a logistic regression has the highest accuracy on every field (type 0.79, urgency 0.74, needs-reply 0.83, is-noise 0.90) at a latency three orders of magnitude lower; the best zero-shot system reaches 0.74 on type. Third, the sender's relationship to the owner is recovered from other emails of the same contact with 98.6% accuracy on the 63% of emails whose sender has been seen before. Fourth, per-email accuracy is not the product metric: composed into actions, the baseline ignores 18% of the emails that needed a reply or a task, against 4% for the best generative model; a cost-chosen threshold cuts that rate to 6% and makes the classifier the cheapest system at every price on the unbiased corpus. A third, adversarially sampled round (722 emails in total) with eleven pre-registered hypotheses confirms seven and refutes four. Two blind annotators agree with the reference at kappa = 0.81 and 0.86 on type. We release the protocol, the harness and the pre-registration; the emails stay private.

cs.CL · cs.HC · cs.LG

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2608.27462

Sledgehammer or Scalpel? A Fine-grained Adaptive Framework for Implicit Hate Speech Detection

Han Wang, Hanqing Tao, Xuesong Wang, Yi Zhu

原文摘要

Unlike explicit attacks with obvious profanity, implicit hate speech hides malice within seemingly compliant expressions through metaphors and contextual hints, making its detection in online content review challenging. Many PLM- or LLM-based methods apply the same processing pipeline across samples, which may overlook differences in information requirements and introduce unnecessary computation. We observe that online hate speech is not monolithic but manifests in varied forms. We therefore define three fine-grained categories: Shallow, Targeted, and Context-Dependent. Accordingly, we propose Fine-grained Adaptive Implicit Hate speech Detection (FAID), a novel framework that first performs fine-grained classification and then adapts to specific categories. Specifically, for Shallow samples with surface-identifiable intents, the framework adopts lightweight Prompt-Tuning for rapid classification; for Targeted comments that bind malicious intent to concealed targets, we design knowledge augmentation to iteratively refine the model and reveal hidden targets; for Context-Dependent comments lacking background information, we utilize an agentic framework that automatically generates prompts to evolve context, infer missing background information and identify ambiguous malicious intents. This adaptive architecture focuses computational resources on complex implicit samples while avoiding redundant reasoning for shallow samples. Experiments on four benchmark datasets demonstrate that FAID significantly outperforms SOTA baselines.

cs.CL · cs.AI

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.02692

LLMs Cannot Be Neutral: Gender Sensitivity Across Candidates, Evaluators, and Models

Danial Amin, Joni Salminen, Bernard J. Jansen

原文摘要

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to evaluate candidates for professional roles, raising concerns about their sensitivity to demographic identities. We examine how candidate and evaluator gender assignments affect decisions by LLM-as-a-Judge (LaJ) models and decision language models (DLMs). In a hypothetical city council voting task, eight models evaluated 240 synthetic professional narratives from NVIDIA's US and French Nemotron-Personas datasets under independently varied gender assignments, producing 30,720 judgments. Explicit candidate gender labels increased Yes-vote probability by 1.05-1.73 percentage points relative to unspecified gender, while only the nonbinary evaluator assignment showed a significant increase (1.26 points). Identity matching showed no significant overall association. Yes-vote rates varied across models (81.3-97.2%), and 2.5-3.3% of decisions reversed relative to the unspecified-identity baseline. Under direct substitutions between explicit gender identities, DLMs exhibited fewer decision reversals than LaJ models (1.18% vs. 3.38%), indicating lower observed decision-level gender sensitivity among the tested DLMs. These findings demonstrate that gender sensitivity depends on candidate and evaluator identities and the evaluation model, while highlighting the importance of examining individual decision consistency alongside aggregate differences.

cs.CL · cs.HC

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.02666

Train the Sampler You Run: Few-Step Masked Diffusion Language Models via Mixture-Likelihood Fine-Tuning

Amin Najafgholizadeh

原文摘要

When a masked diffusion language model is sampled in a few parallel steps in a random order, the model actually run is a mixture over reveal plans, while cross-entropy training fits token conditionals rather than this mixture. We introduce mixture-likelihood fine-tuning (Mix-FT), which fine-tunes a pretrained model on an importance-weighted bound of its own sampler's likelihood, with no teacher and no change to the architecture or the sampler. On LLaDA-8B, a LoRA fine-tune for 0.002% of the pretraining compute writes better OpenWebText continuations than continued cross-entropy and Alpha diffusion given the same compute, at every tested step count. With half the model evaluations, 16 rather than 32 steps per block, its continuations score better than the original model's in every seed under three judges, with confidence-based decoding as well as random order, and under confidence-based decoding two blinded LLM raters from different model families prefer them in 69 and 71% of pairs. On a public 110M-parameter block diffusion model, Mix-FT takes under four T4-hours and beats continued cross-entropy, Alpha diffusion and SDTT distillation at 4, 8 and 16 steps per block, under two judges in every seed. Exact likelihoods on text8, with a control that weights every plan equally, attribute about three quarters of the likelihood gain over continued cross-entropy to weighting each plan by how well it explains the sequence.

cs.LG · cs.CL

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
版本更新 · v5arXiv:2606.09570

UXBench: Benchmarking User Experience in AI Assistants

Mengze Hong, Xia Zeng, Zeyang Lei, Sheng Wang, Chen Jason Zhang, Di Jiang, Taiming Fu, Jinfeng Huang 等 16 位作者

原文摘要

As AI assistants serve millions of users daily, evaluating user experience (UX) beyond general model capability has become increasingly important. We present \textbf{UXBench}, the first user-centric benchmark grounded in real user feedback signals for evaluating preference alignment and dialogue generation. The benchmark consists of three interconnected tasks, UX Judge, UX Eval, and UX Recovery, with 7,400 test instances extracted from over 70K interaction logs of a mainstream Chinese AI assistant. The dataset closely reflects real user distributions, covering 8 scenarios, 83 domains, and diverse failure patterns that pose severe challenges. Extensive experiments on 26 frontier language models provide novel insights into how well models perceive user experience and how improvements in model capability contribute to better dialogue engagement. Through analyses of model behavior and performance gaps, we document six important findings, demonstrating that user feedback prediction is a learnable capability and revealing different aspects that influence user experience. UXBench establishes a new evaluation landscape and calls for greater attention to tailored UX optimization, contributing toward a user-centric scaling law for the development of successful AI assistants. The full project is released at https://github.com/mengze-hong/UXBench.

cs.CL · cs.HC

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2604.19144

ReflectMT: Internalizing Reflection for Efficient and High-Quality Machine Translation

Kunquan Li, Yingxue Zhang, Zhibin Lan, Fandong Meng, Jinsong Su

原文摘要

Recent years have witnessed growing interest in applying Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) to Machine Translation (MT). While most approaches adopt a 'pre-thinking' paradigm and benefit from explicit reasoning trajectories, they suffer from substantial inference cost and latency. To address these limitations, we propose ReflectMT, a two-stage reflection internalization framework for machine translation that employs a 'post-thinking' paradigm. Our approach develops the model's 'translate-reflect-refine' capability through reinforcement learning. In the first stage, we cultivate the model's capacity for high-quality reflection and refinement, thereby enhancing its semantic comprehension and task-specific knowledge. In the second stage, we train the model to internalize the knowledge acquired during reflection. On WMT24, ReflectMT achieves a GPT-4o-based GRF score of 86.16, outperforming DeepSeek-R1 (84.03) by 2.13 points, while using approximately 92% fewer output tokens. Independent automatic evaluation, a blinded human evaluation, and preliminary experiments on three additional translation directions provide further evidence for the framework's effectiveness.

cs.CL

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.02657

Constructing an Artworld Influencers Network by Mining Social Media

Amalia Foka

原文摘要

The author shows a methodology for constructing a network map of the artworld. The tweets posted by a manually comprised set of exemplar artworld actors and Natural Language Processing (NLP) methods are used to identify significant artworld actors, including those that do not own a Twitter account. Identified artworld actors form communities detected with the Louvain method, and their authority is evaluated with the HITS centrality method. The resulting artworld network exhibits the ability, starting with a small set of exemplar actors, to identify new artworld actors and provides a wealth of data that would be very hard to collect otherwise.

cs.SI · cs.CL · cs.CY

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.02637

Variable names provide priors: semantic grounding enables data-efficient numerical prediction by large language models

Xin-Rui Ma, Shi-Zhi Chen, Hai-Yan Jiang, De-Cheng Feng, Michael Beer

原文摘要

Large language models (LLMs) have achieved strong performance across diverse tasks, from question answering to code generation. Recent studies have found that LLMs can perform numerical prediction on tabular datasets via in-context learning. However, it remains unclear under what conditions and how LLMs use variable names and in-context examples for numerical prediction. Here we show that semantic grounding, the match between variable names and the values they describe, allows five LLMs without task-specific training to match or outperform seven supervised machine learning (ML) models across 20 datasets from nine scientific domains, particularly when examples are scarce. Reasoning traces indicate that variable names allow LLMs to draw on domain-specific knowledge acquired during pretraining. Using controlled tasks based on physical formulas, we further show that LLMs integrate domain-specific knowledge with in-context examples in a way consistent with Bayesian updating. Specifically, when the relationship between the inputs and the target cannot be inferred from the examples alone, LLMs rely on domain-specific knowledge as the prior. Conversely, as contradicting examples accumulate, LLM predictions shift progressively towards these examples, which act as the likelihood. Our work reveals how LLMs use domain-specific knowledge in numerical prediction and positions them as data-efficient predictors for data-scarce scientific domains.

cs.AI · cs.CL · cs.LG

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.02630

ICJ-Graph: A Citation Graph and a Layered Document Corpus of the International Court of Justice

Jirameth Wannasiwaporn, Pawitsapak Akarajaradwong, Chompakorn Chaksangchaichot

原文摘要

We present ICJ-Graph, a machine-readable resource connecting documents of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to cited cases, legal provisions and United Nations resolutions. Court decisions, written pleadings and oral records form distinct document layers, preserving the distinction between the Court's reasoning and the parties' submissions. The collection contains 6,396 ICJ documents and 505 documents from other courts and legal bodies, together with 12,375 provisions and 20,291 UN resolutions. The data files contain text, metadata and embeddings. The accompanying pipeline lets users load the graph and generate embeddings for use in their own retrieval systems. To illustrate the resource's use, we evaluate five models on citation prediction for 199 decisions using documents available before each decision. Tools designed for citation research improve citation-prediction F1 over answering without tools for all five models across case, provision and resolution citations.

cs.CL

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.02612

Scalaris: A Scalable Enterprise Memory Architecture for Conversational AI Assistants

Devarsh Gandhi, Sarthak Pawar, Hemprasad Badgujar, Vaibhav Rathore, Siddharth Sureka, Neha Bhargava

原文摘要

Enterprise conversational systems require memory to personalize interactions, retain information across sessions, and maintain conversational coherence. At enterprise scale, however, memory must not only retrieve relevant information accurately but also provide it efficiently to the answer-generation model. Existing memory systems face a trade-off between retrieval accuracy and context efficiency. Retrieving more context can improve recall but increases inference cost and latency. We present Scalaris, a scalable enterprise memory architecture that addresses this trade-off through a unified long-term and short-term memory design. We propose that user interactions and assistant responses possess distinct characteristics and roles in a conversation: user interactions capture evolving knowledge about the user and provide value across sessions, whereas assistant responses must be stored efficiently so that only information relevant to the current query is retrieved. We therefore treat them separately and support each with specialized representations and ingestion/retrieval pipelines. Scalaris reaches 92.2 % accuracy on LongMemEval-S and 90.77 % on LoCoMo using Qwen3-32B, state-of-the-art results on both benchmarks, while supplying the answer-generation model with approximately 10 times fewer retrieved context tokens than Hindsight, a leading memory system for conversational AI. When integrated with our proprietary closed-source AI assistants, Scalaris improved overall response quality by 36 %. Together, these results establish Scalaris as a cost-effective framework for building scalable, personalized conversational AI systems.

cs.CL · cs.AI

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
版本更新 · v5arXiv:2508.04903

RCR-Router: Efficient Role-Aware Context Routing for Multi-Agent LLM Systems with Structured Memory

Jun Liu, Zhenglun Kong, Changdi Yang, Fan Yang, Tianqi Li, Peiyan Dong, Joannah Nanjekye, Hao Tang 等 15 位作者

原文摘要

Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly organized into multi-agent systems for complex reasoning and decision-making tasks. However, scaling such systems can substantially increase inference cost, especially when multiple agents repeatedly process overlapping or role-irrelevant context. Many existing multi-agent frameworks focus on orchestration and role specialization, but still rely on full-context sharing or static context routing, leading to redundant token consumption, increased runtime, and inefficient memory utilization. We present \emph{Role-Conditioned Context Routing (RCR)}, an execution-time layer that allocates role-relevant shared-memory items to agents under token budgets. Given a structured shared memory and a set of role-specialized agents, RCR selectively routes task-relevant memory items to each agent according to its role, optional task-stage metadata, and token budget. RCR integrates role-conditioned relevance scoring, token-budgeted memory selection, and iterative memory updates to reduce redundant context exposure during multi-agent execution. Experiments on multi-hop QA, embodied reasoning (ALFWorld), and web-based decision-making (WebShop) show that RCR reduces token usage by 35\% on average and runtime by 38\% on average relative to Full-Context, while maintaining or improving task performance.

cs.CL · cs.AI · cs.MA

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.02587

They Know Where It Is, But Not What It Says: A Bilingual Hallucination Benchmark of Hadith Recall in Open LLMs

Dayam Nadeem, Safdar Mustafa, Ameen Ur Rehman, Shahab Saquib Sohail, Mohammad Nadeem, Usman Naseem

原文摘要

Large language models are increasingly consulted for religious knowledge, including the recall of specific Hadith (recorded sayings and actions of the Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him). Unlike open-ended generation, Hadith recall is a high-stakes, verifiable task: a reference (collection, chapter, and Hadith number) has exactly one correct text, and any deviation from it constitutes a fabrication that can be mistaken for authentic scripture. This study introduces a bilingual (English/Arabic) benchmark that probes five open-weight, locally-deployable language models (Mistral-7B, Gemma3-4B, Jais-7B, ALLaM-7B, and Phi4-mini-3.8B) across all six canonical Sunni Hadith collections (Sahih al-Bukhari, Sahih Muslim, Sunan Abi Da'ud, Jami' al-Tirmidhi, Sunan an-Nasa'i, Sunan Ibn Majah), sampling 500 Hadith per collection (3,000 per model per language, 30,000 responses total). Each model is given only the bibliographic reference and asked to reproduce the exact Hadith text, with no retrieval augmentation, and is scored on lexical fidelity (BLEU) and semantic fidelity (multilingual cosine similarity), with refusals flagged separately. Across all five models and both languages, 0% of 30,000 responses achieve both high lexical and high semantic fidelity, i.e., an exact, verifiable match to the source text. Arabic responses fare uniformly worse than English. These findings suggest that current open-weight LLMs, used without retrieval grounding, are unreliable and potentially dangerous sources for exact religious-text recall, and that deployment for Islamic scholarship should mandate retrieval-augmented generation over a verified corpus rather than parametric memory. The complete code, prompts, evaluation pipeline, and scored outputs are publicly available at https://github.com/dayam8696/Hadith-Hallucination-Benchmark.

cs.CL · cs.AI

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.02585

From Language to Country to Valence: A Multilingual Audit of Stereotype Bias Across LLMs

Zihao Sun

原文摘要

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly considered for education, recruitment, workplace decision support, and other consequential applications, making pre-deployment social-bias detection essential. Yet major benchmarks are English-centred or translated, focus mainly on negative stereotypes, and may miss linguistic and cultural variation. We investigate gender, racial, and religious bias using 12,000 locally written Reddit posts in English, Spanish, French, and German. Only search terms are translated, preserving local context. The dataset is balanced by language and category; English gender is additionally balanced by stereotype valence. Three open-weight and three proprietary API-based models are evaluated with a two-blank design that reduces grammatical-gender cues. Religion has the highest absolute choice imbalance in every model-language condition. Spanish is highest for gender, whereas German is highest for race and religion. The evaluated API models score below the open-weight models throughout. Negative English-gender items exceed positive items; Australian and Mexican contexts exceed their Canadian and Spanish counterparts. These descriptive differences measure choice concentration, not stereotype endorsement or causal country effects. The crossed patterns show how aggregate scores can conceal category- and context-specific behaviour, motivating closer inspection before deployment.

cs.CL

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.02581

SMILE: A Structured Multi-Agent Clinical Reasoning for Liver Ultrasound Understanding

Haris Ghafoor, Minjee Seo, Seonaeng cho, Keungmo Yang, Jaejun Lee, Kyungho Yoon

原文摘要

Automated liver ultrasound report generation improves the diagnosis of liver diseases by producing clinically structured descriptions of anatomical and disease-related findings. However, current generative vision-language models (VLMs) often rely on a single reasoning pathway that maps ultrasound appearance directly to textual descriptions. In addition to the inherent vision-language modality gap, this design is limited for liver ultrasound because disease interpretation is constrained by subtle visual evidence, heterogeneous disease patterns, and limited paired supervision. To address these limitations, we propose SMILE, a Structured Multi-agent clInicaL rEasoning framework that uses multiple complementary specialist agents to interpret ultrasound images and consolidates their outputs through a judge-guided consensus mechanism. Our approach employs three specialized agents: an image interpretation agent for morphological descriptions, a clinical-stage reasoning agent, and a visual question answering (VQA) agent for targeted queries. These agent responses are then aggregated and scrutinized by a judge VLM using a consensus filtering prompt to produce a unified, clinically coherent output. Across a public liver ultrasound dataset and an internal clinical dataset, SMILE consistently outperforms state-of-the-art VLMs, achieving up to 19.0\% improvement in ROUGE-1 and 18.8\% improvement in clinical F1-score, while reaching VQA F1-scores of 0.82 and 0.65 on public and internal datasets, respectively. These results demonstrate the potential of SMILE for data-scarce and limited-supervision clinical settings. Our models, datasets, and code are available \href{https://github.com/CMME-Lab/SMILE}{here}.

cs.CV · cs.CL · cs.LG

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
版本更新 · v5arXiv:2609.24965

Jev for Scientific Decisions: Evaluating Semantic Choices and Their Consequences

Boyuan Deng, Shuyi Fan, Hongyang Zhang, Xinhong Xie

原文摘要

Scientific workflows often require choosing among known relations before a deterministic calculation can proceed. Whether observations share a culture, treatment or reference standard can change the scientific meaning of the resulting count or comparison. Once the evidence is prepared and the calculation is written as code, this choice reduces to one semantic judgment among listed candidates. We evaluate Jev on this step, using a harness that follows its documented guidance. The study compares twelve model configurations on twenty Choices in ten scientific cases built from published sources, each repeated five times. We measure semantic selections, downstream outputs and final claim labels separately. Jev tied with five other configurations at complete semantic correctness and achieved the lowest observed median latency and known mean cost among successful responses. On one question, whether samples shared a culture, three comparison models made seven wrong selections that changed downstream counts while preserving the correct final label. These results support using Jev to select relations when the evidence and candidates are prepared in advance, and show that evaluating it requires checking the relations and quantities that a workflow will reuse.

cs.CL · cs.AI

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2610.37682

Rank-Aware Differentially Private Release of Listwise Preferences for LLM Alignment

Junwei Chen, Manjiang Yu, Pengpeng Qiao, Yang Cao

原文摘要

Listwise preference feedback offers richer supervision for large language model (LLMs) alignment than pairwise comparisons, but a full ranking also reveals more sensitive user preferences. Existing privacy-preserving alignment methods focus mainly on pairwise feedback, while listwise alignment under local differential privacy (LDP) remains unexplored. Extending LDP to this listwise domain raises a critical challenge: the high sensitivity of the full ranking space demands excessive noise, neutralizing the benefits of listwise supervision. To address this challenge, we analyze the interaction between supervision granularity and privacy noise in downstream training, and introduce a rank-aware exponential mechanism that privatizes listwise preference data into a low-sensitivity granularity suitable for downstream alignment. The mechanism leverages ranking information to sample a fixed-size binary partition, concentrating the noise near borderline items instead of perturbing all items uniformly as randomized response (RR) does. Empirical evaluations on downstream LLM alignment tasks show that our mechanism consistently outperforms existing LDP baselines at matched privacy budgets. The code is available at https://github.com/tdsai-lab/RAEM.

cs.CL · cs.AI

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.02550

Re$^3$Rank: Listwise Reranking with Reasoning-Conditioned Retrieval Heads

Ruiyi Yan, Zhuoyuan Mao, Yugo Murawaki, Yiwen Guo

原文摘要

Attention-based rerankers score each candidate by the attention mass that retrieval heads route to it from the question, but the question, serving as a fixed query, carries limited information for locating relevant evidence. We propose Re$^3$Rank, a listwise reranker built on reasoning-conditioned retrieval heads (RRHeads). A generator first writes a reasoning trace over the question and the candidates, and a scorer then uses the trace tokens as the attention query of a few selected RRHeads, reading relevance as continuous scores. We present a straight-through estimator to propagate the ranking loss through the discrete trace, so that the generator and the scorer can be trained jointly for ranking. Averaged over 9 benchmarks, Re$^3$Rank outperforms 11 baseline rerankers: our 4B variant exceeds the strongest baseline by 3.11 NDCG@10 points on average, and even our 0.6B variant surpasses rerankers with up to 32B parameters.

cs.CL

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.02540

PixelBench: Can LLMs Understand and Generate Images Pixel by Pixel?

Haoquan Zhang, Feiyang Liu, Juanxi Tian, Wanhua Li, Haodong Duan, Weiyang Liu

原文摘要

Large language models (LLMs) can generate visual assets through text-based formats such as SVG and CAD, but these symbolic representations describe images using high-level primitives rather than explicit raster values. We ask whether LLMs can instead generate pixel images directly through their existing vocabulary, without a learned image tokenizer or decoder. We introduce PixelBench, a benchmark for text-to-pixel (T2P) and image-to-pixel (I2P) generation across multiple resolutions, together with a complementary pixel-understanding evaluation. Models generate an RGB color palette followed by a grid of indices specifying the palette color of each output pixel. In T2P, the strongest models produce recognizable images directly from text. In I2P, the strongest models outperform palette-matched downsampling and specialized pixelization algorithms at low resolutions. Pixel-understanding performance correlates strongly with generation performance. A resolution-scaling study shows that pixel-generation performance often improves initially before declining at high resolutions. Finally, we introduce Pixel Reconstruction Tuning (PRT), which augments visual instruction tuning with caption-palette-grid trajectories. We post-train Molmo2-4B from its pretraining checkpoint by mixing general instruction data with our curated PRT data, improving performance across 16 visual-centric benchmarks, indicating that explicit pixel reconstruction can provide useful auxiliary supervision.

cs.CV · cs.CL · cs.LG

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.02529

Tune the Baseline First: Most of Muon's Scaled Weight Decay Gain Is a Tuning Gap, but Its Small Real Advantage Grows With Model Size

Esther Xin

原文摘要

Scaled weight decay for Muon (Muon-SW) has been reported to train language models more efficiently than constant decoupled weight decay, but such comparisons usually reuse one learning-rate (LR) and weight-decay (WD) setting for both methods. We re-run the comparison under the MAI-Base-2 protocol: LR and WD are tuned jointly through their product for each method, on a source-scaled mixture-of-experts (MoE) scaling ladder (1.9M to 15M active parameters) that holds tokens per active parameter and data repetition fixed across sizes. We find: (1) Most of the gain is a tuning gap. At the shared setting Muon-SW wins by 0.035 bits per byte (BPB), a 1.52x compute saving; after both methods are tuned, the gap is 0.0026 BPB (95% CI [0.0018, 0.0034]), a 1.03x saving, so about 90% of the advantage disappears. (2) The small advantage that remains is real: at the smallest size, all four paired seeds favour Muon-SW at the tuned settings. (3) That advantage grows with model size: across an 8x range of active parameters, the tuned gap rises from 0.0036 to 0.0051 BPB while the untuned gap shrinks from 0.035 to 0.024, so the surviving share rises from about 10% to 21%. (4) The best weight decay moves with scale: the optimal LRWD product grows for both methods, faster for Muon-SW (ratio 1.40 to 1.91), and a law fitted on the two smallest sizes overshoots the third by 1.3-1.5x, costing up to 0.002 BPB. The whole study runs on one NVIDIA T4 GPU; we release the code and all run results.

cs.CL · cs.LG

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.02522

Ranked but Not Stopped: Detecting Prompt-Injection Hijacks from Typed Decision Models' Output Probabilities

Junwei Yao, Jianan Liu, Yongxi Zhou, Zike Yang

原文摘要

Programs that use a language model as a classifier act on its most probable label. Text injected into the input can move that label to one the attacker chooses, a hijack. A monitor that does not know the attacker's label can read the model's own confidence and raise an alarm when the top probability is low. We test this monitor on AG News topic classification with five systems, three of them served through a provider's API. Pooled over five families of injected text, low confidence ranks hijacked answers above clean ones on four of the five systems (AUROC 0.86-0.90). Ranking them does not stop many of them. A threshold set so that at most 5% of clean answers to separate calibration articles alarm falls among the least confident clean answers, and every more confident hijack passes. In our main gate run on the three API-served systems, the monitor misses 51-70% of the hijacks caused by a plain injected note (per-system point estimates). When the note adds one handwritten sentence that calls the target certain and asks for full probability, the monitor misses 99-100% of the hijacks, although low confidence still ranks them at AUROC 0.70-0.79. Confidence monitors should be tested at their operating alarm rate, against attackers who claim certainty.

cs.CL · cs.CR

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
版本更新 · v3arXiv:2610.38249

Keepace.ai: A Technical Report on a Large Language Model for Sports and Health

Keepace. ai Team, Bowen Wu, Heng Wang, Jufeng Mi, Kang Liu, Kun Li, Long He, Manling Han 等 15 位作者

原文摘要

Large language models hold promise for delivering safe, scientifically grounded, and personalized exercise guidance at scale, yet the sports-and-health domain still lacks curated training corpora and rigorous evaluation benchmarks. Keepace (Keepace.ai) is a domain-specialized LLM built on Qwen3.5-27B through post-training, currently optimized for Chinese-language exercise guidance across three tasks: workout plan generation, sports-and-health knowledge QA, and personal sports data analysis. In internal rubric-based evaluations designed with domain experts, Keepace outperforms its base model and larger general-purpose baselines, with the most pronounced improvements in exercise safety, boundary compliance, structured output completeness, and scientific accuracy. This report summarizes the current design, data pipeline, safety-first evaluation framework, and evaluation results of Keepace.

cs.CL

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2605.29319

Rethinking Stepwise Model Routing: A Cost-Efficient Table Reasoning Perspective

Shenghao Ye, Yuxiang Wang, Yu Guo, Tao Zhang, Shuangwu Chen, Zijian Wen, Qihui Zhu, Mengjie Zhang 等 11 位作者

原文摘要

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) achieve strong performance on table reasoning tasks but incur substantial inference cost due to long reasoning traces. Stepwise model routing mitigates this issue by dynamically assigning reasoning steps to smaller or larger models. However, stepwise model routing for table reasoning remains underexplored. Through empirical analysis, we find that reasoning steps involving tables contain two types of tokens with distinct uncertainty distributions: table tokens grounded in table structure, such as cell values and headers, and text tokens representing surrounding natural-language reasoning. The uncertainty of both token types is correlated with the risk that the model makes an error in the next reasoning step. However, existing methods fail to model them separately, leading to suboptimal routing decisions. To address this, we propose EcoTab, a table-aware stepwise routing framework for efficient table reasoning. At each reasoning step, EcoTab separately estimates the uncertainties of table tokens and text tokens, maps them to next-step failure risks for the small model, and combines the two risks for routing. Experiments on multiple table reasoning benchmarks show that EcoTab consistently outperforms strong baselines and achieves a better balance between accuracy and efficiency.

cs.CL

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.02491

Same Sentence, Different Construct: Identity-Swapped Rationales Reveal Measurement Non-Invariance in LLM Hate Speech Classifiers

Wenchang Wang, Yue Song

原文摘要

Large language models are increasingly used as measurement instruments for socially consequential constructs such as hate speech, and are typically validated by their aggregate agreement with human labels. A valid instrument must also apply the same construct to every group it measures. We test this requirement using 421 \hc{} templates that are instantiated identically for seven protected groups, so that only the identity term varies. Four LLM classifiers each exceed 0.95 balanced accuracy, yet within identical templates two of them miss hateful statements about women at markedly higher rates than the same statements about other groups (excess false-negative rates of 8.3 and 4.4 percentage points), a gap first reported for fine-tuned classifiers in 2021. We show how the construct shifts. Comparing rationales within each template, we find that models invoke protected-group status for other groups but recast the identical statement about women as personal dislike or as aimed at an individual, in 22 of 30 missed templates for one model. Adding the benchmark's own definition, which lists sex as a protected characteristic, does not close the gap, and the contrast persists. Apparent false-positive disparities, by contrast, largely vanish under identity control and trace to reclaimed slurs present only for some groups. Errors shared by all models concentrate where model and benchmark definitions diverge, and pairwise counterfactual accuracy adds little beyond endpoint accuracy. We argue that validating LLM measurement requires identity-controlled tests of measurement invariance that examine both decisions and the criteria models state for them.

cs.CL

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗