Qazi Mamunur Rashid, Xuan Yang, Zhengzhe Yang, Yanzhou Pan, Erin van Liemt, Darlene Neal, Kshitij Pancholi
Recent advancements in generative AI facilitate large-scale synthetic data genera- tion for model evaluation. However, without targeted approaches, these datasets often lack the sociotechnical nuance required for sensitive domains. We introduce NodeSyn, an evidence-grounded methodology that generates socially relevant syn- thetic queries by leveraging a fine-tuned taxonomy generator (TaG) anchored in real-world evidence. Evaluated against four mainstream LLMs, NodeSyn elicited failure rates up to five times higher than human-authored benchmarks. Ablation studies confirm that our granular taxonomic expansion significantly drives these failure rates, while independent validation reveals critical deficiencies in prominent guard models.
Practitioners who compare systems with an LLM judge and have no human labels often check a conclusion by repeating it with a judge from another provider. We test how far that check can be trusted. In a preregistered study (with a disclosed post-registration reduction of the judge set), five judge models from three providers re-judged 4,000 Chatbot Arena battles (nine systems, 33 system pairs) that carry human votes, each in both response orders. Agreement with the human vote was low at the verdict level (median Cohen's kappa = 0.22), and system rankings did not survive a change of judge: Kendall's tau with the human ranking ranged from 0.17 to 0.89 (median 0.67), so the preregistered hypothesis that rankings remain stable was not supported. Conclusions replicated by two low-cost judges from different providers matched the human conclusion more often than single-judge conclusions (+0.10 precision), but the gain came from filtering out one poorly aligned judge, and replication involving that judge left a conclusion for only 35% of comparisons. Judges that agreed with humans reached a stable conclusion with no more verdicts than human votes required; the others failed to converge on 26-70% of system pairs at the sample sizes tested (up to 100 verdicts per pair). Disagreements with the human vote co-occurred across judges far more often than independence predicts, although a single human vote per battle cannot separate shared judge bias from voter noise.
As multimodal conversational systems increasingly engage in spoken interaction, their ability to navigate paralinguistic social cues has become a critical bottleneck for natural human-AI communication. However, existing evaluations of machine emotional intelligence assess reasoning exclusively through isolated text or passive acoustic perception, overlooking the complex cross-modal reasoning required for active, multi-turn dialogue. We introduce \textsc{SpeechEQ}, a comprehensive framework designed to evaluate the sociolinguistic reasoning of Speech-Language Models (SLMs). The framework includes a validated dataset of 2,265 dialogues across 15 Emotional Quotient (EQ) subscales grounded in EQ-i 2.0 theory, along with a multi-turn evaluation protocol measured by our proposed Spoken EQ (SEQ) score inspired by human EQ assessments. Experiments show limitations in how both existing Speech Emotion Recognition and end-to-end Speech-Language Models understand and apply paralinguistic cues through speech. While end-to-end architectures outperform cascaded systems, \textsc{SpeechEQ} reveals that current multimodal models remain bottlenecked by a text-reliant ``modality shortcut,'' an alignment-induced ``safety trap,'' and ``contextual amnesia,'' highlighting the barriers to truly emotionally aware AI. Our benchmark can be accessed at https://huggingface.co/datasets/SpeechEQ/SpeechEQ and demo page at https://speecheq.github.io
Sebastian Pohl, Harsh Mehta, Pranav Mambayil, Abdul Ghafoor, Franziska Lesigang, Yufang Hou, Christian Hilbe
LLMs are increasingly deployed as proxies for human study participants in social science experiments, yet the fidelity of this practice has rarely been tested directly. We test whether six LLMs can simulate individual human belief updates, comparing LLM outputs 1-to-1 against ground truth data from 391 UK participants on Prolific, who updated their stances on three discussion topics after reading Reddit comments. Each participant was simulated by an LLM conditioned on a persona derived from their demographic and personality trait data. Given participants' actual initial stances, five of the six models showed no systematic directional bias in their simulated post-stances, although the size of their individual-level errors varied considerably between models. All six models fail to simulate initial stances themselves and to produce faithful belief updates from self-generated stances. Three systematic biases emerge across all models: overrepresentation of neutral positions, more frequent but smaller belief shifts than humans, and a failure to rank comments by convincingness. Demographic and personality trait personas had no consistent effect on fidelity. We conclude that without grounding in realistic initial stances, LLM simulations of human belief dynamics cannot be considered reliable, a condition that current multi-round social media simulations rarely meet.
Syntactic convergence - the tendency of speakers to adapt in language towards the grammatical profiles of their interlocutors - is a well-documented, largely implicit feature of human dialogue. Whether large language models exhibit analogous syntactic convergence towards human users relative to human baselines (including across a broad range of syntactic constructions) remains an open question. Using substitution-paradigm data from Blevins et al. [2026] in which model generations replace one speaker's turns in pre-existing human dialogues, this study measures turn-adjacent reuse of context-free grammar (CFG) rules across sixteen open-weight Llama and Gemma models (1B-70B, pretrained and instruction-tuned) at 1,901 matched positions per model. Every model showed greater CFG-rule overlap with the preceding human turn than with a sampled unrelated human prime (a context-associated effect that does not isolate syntactic priming from topical continuity), and this actual-versus-random difference was larger for lower-frequency rules. Each instruction-tuned model also showed greater natural-output overlap with the actual prime than the human response it replaced, and all eight matched architecture pairs exhibited greater actual-prime overlap after instruction tuning. However, relative to pretrained variants, instruction-tuned outputs overlapped more with unrelated primes, showed a smaller actual-versus-random increment, and had lower conditional rule-reuse odds once target rule-set size was held constant. In exploratory analyses, each model exhibited greater mean lexical and semantic similarity to the preceding turn than matched human responses did. Instruction-tuned models additionally produced responses with greater mean semantic similarity than their pretrained counterparts in all eight architecture pairs, whereas the lexical similarity results were more heterogeneous.
We introduce Nemotron 3.5 Super and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning, open and efficient Mixture-of-Experts Hybrid Mamba-Transformer models designed for reasoning, long-context understanding, and agentic workloads. Super is a 120B-parameter, 12B-active multimodal model, while Lightning is a smaller 30B-parameter, 3B-active text model; both designed for efficient deployment. Both models combine large-scale distillation, long-context training, and native speculative decoding, while Super further incorporates Indic continued pretraining and agentic software-engineering mid-training. We develop a comprehensive post-training pipeline spanning supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning (RLVR and RLHF), complemented in Super by specialized teacher training and multi- teacher on-policy distillation (MOPD). This transforms Super from a text-only base model into a multimodal agent capable of reasoning over text, images, video, and interactive tool environments. We further explore test-time scaling through parallel agent execution and self-verification. Across training and deployment, we jointly optimize capability and efficiency. Indic continued pretraining improves Indian-language benchmarks by up to 9.82 percentage points, while agentic mid-training strengthens software-engineering capabilities and robustness across agent harnesses. The post-trained Super model achieves 51.78% on SWE-bench Pro, surpassing Nemotron 3 Ultra despite using approximately 4.6x fewer active parameters. Post-training MTP boosting improves speculative- decoding acceptance length by up to 21.8% under probabilistic draft sampling, while NVFP4 quantization achieves 99.62% median accuracy recovery relative to BF16. Inference optimizations enable up to 4,856 output tokens/s/GPU on GB200 while sustaining at least 50 tokens/s/user.
Ilija Subasic, Brett Levert, Andrew Rabinovich, Sajjad Pakdamansavoji, Zhao Chen
LLM-as-a-Judge has become a standard for evaluating large language models, yet most approaches implicitly assume that a single judge prompt functions as a stable evaluation instrument. Prior work has primarily explored deliberate prompt modifications such as scoring rubrics, role descriptions, or chain-of-thought reasoning in order to optimize accuracy. In contrast, we investigate whether validated prompt variants intended to preserve evaluation semantics while differing in surface realization (\textit{paraphrastic rephrasings}) yield consistent judgments under a fixed evaluation task. We introduce \textit{Prompt Lottery}, a phenomenon in which paraphrastic rephrasings produce different LLMaJ judgments. Across a large-scale study spanning diverse evaluation tasks, judge families, and model backbones, we find that these variations can alter evaluation outcomes and, in some settings, reverse relative model rankings. A user study with 10 human annotators shows that LLMaJ judges exhibit 6-9$\times$ larger agreement degradation under prompt rephrasings than humans, falling below the generally accepted threshold in usability studies. This indicates that single-prompt evaluation is insufficiently robust for model ranking. Finally, we show that multi-prompt aggregation substantially improves robustness by emphasizing judgments that remain consistent across prompt variants.
Sitao Cheng, Tianle Li, Xuhan Huang, Xunjian Yin, Difan Zou
Crafting effective reward signals remains a central challenge in reinforcement learning (RL) for complex reasoning. Existing methods for automated reward optimization search with a fixed proposer which never learns from its costly trials. We present Dual-Evolving Reinforcement Learning (DERL), a dual-training framework for autonomous discovery of reward structures. An outer-loop proposer composes a reward from task primitives, and an inner policy trains with this reward. The proposer itself learns by policy gradient from the validation performance of the inner policy. Thus, DERL utilizes past-trial feedback to shape its reward-proposal distribution, an empirical meta-gradient of task success. We validate DERL on embodied (ALFWorld), scientific (ScienceWorld), and mathematical (GSM8K, MATH) reasoning. On multi-turn agent benchmarks, DERL outperforms strong baselines, significantly on out-of-distribution tasks. In mathematics, DERL improves on the outcome reward where directly added primitives hurt. Further analyses under matched compute show that our proposer effectively captures the meta-gradient to discover useful reward signals.
As people turn to LLMs for social advice, understanding their behavior in such contexts becomes essential. In this work, we focus on behavioral dispositions: the underlying tendencies that shape responses in social contexts. We introduce STAR, a framework for studying how closely the dispositions expressed by LLMs align with those of humans. STAR builds on established psychological questionnaires, adapting their items into realistic advice-seeking scenarios, as self-report may not transfer to actual advisory behavior. Using STAR, we construct a dataset of 23k scenarios, each validated by 3 raters and annotated with preferences from 10 participants. Across 25 LLMs, we find that (1) when human consensus is high, frontier models can fail to reflect it in 15-20% of cases, and smaller models fail at substantially higher rates; (2) when humans disagree, LLM recommendations are substantially less diverse than human choices, both within individual models and even across models from different providers, potentially narrowing the range of options users are guided toward; (3) LLMs' self-reported values are poor predictors of their recommendations. To support future research we make our dataset and code publicly available.
Di Zhang, Xun Wu, Shaohan Huang, Lingjie Jiang Peking University, Yaru Hao Microsoft Research Asia, Li Dong Microsoft Research, Zewen Chi Microsoft Research, Zhifang Sui Peking University 等 9 位作者
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for improving reasoning capabilities. However, training RLVR with Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) policies remains fragile and is often prone to reward collapse.We identify a MoE-specific source of instability, referred to as router shift (RS), where changes in expert routing across policy updates exacerbate off-policy mismatch. This effect leads to increasingly volatile importance-ratio signals and bursty clipping behavior, which consistently precede training collapse.Motivated by this diagnosis, we propose Router-Shift Policy Optimization (RSPO). RSPO computes a per-token router-shift ratio conditioned on the previously activated experts, applies stop-gradient and a lower-bound floor, and softly rescales importance ratios prior to clipping and aggregation. This design explicitly accounts for routing-induced distributional drift during off-policy optimization.We evaluate the effect of RSPO under two settings: a synthetic countdown task and real-world reasoning tasks on MATH and Code. Across both settings, RSPO achieves better performance and exhibits greater stability compared to recent MoE-based RLVR methods.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Junmyeong Lee, Chan Hur Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute, ChangSu Choi, Sukmin Cho Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Fitsum Gaim, Eui Jun Hwang Korea Advanced Institute of Science & Technology, Hoyun Song Korea Advanced Institute of Science & Technology, KyungTae Lim Korea Advanced Institute of Science & Technology
Sign Language Retrieval (SLRet) enables efficient access to sign language content but remains fragile in fine-grained scenarios where visually similar signs must be distinguished. We show that this limitation does not stem from model capacity, but from ineffective hard negative supervision. Specifically, we formulate fine-grained retrieval failures as a negative distribution mismatch: semantically distinct yet visually confusable signs are rarely treated as hard negatives, while existing text-based mining strategies fail to capture such visual ambiguity. To address this issue, we propose Sign-Aware Hard Negative Mining (SAN), which constructs hard negatives based on visual confusability in the sign embedding space rather than linguistic similarity. Experiments on PHOENIX-2014T demonstrate that SAN substantially improves fine-grained retrieval performance while preserving coarse-grained accuracy, highlighting the importance of aligning negative supervision with visual ambiguity in sign language retrieval.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Arkadiusz Modzelewski, Paweł Golik Allegro, Anna Kołos, Giovanni Da San Martino University of Padua
Large Language Models (LLMs) can generate highly persuasive text, raising concerns about their misuse for propaganda, manipulation, and other harmful purposes. This leads us to our central question: Is LLM-generated persuasion more difficult to automatically detect than human-written persuasion? To address this, we categorize controllable generation approaches for producing persuasive content with LLMs and introduce Persuaficial, a high-quality multilingual benchmark covering six languages: English, German, Polish, Italian, French and Russian. Using this benchmark, we conduct extensive empirical evaluations comparing human-authored and LLM-generated persuasive texts. We find that although overtly persuasive LLM-generated texts can be easier to detect than human-written ones, subtle LLM-generated persuasion consistently degrades automatic detection performance. Beyond detection performance, we provide the first comprehensive linguistic analysis contrasting human and LLM-generated persuasive texts, offering insights that may guide the development of more interpretable and robust detection tools.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Xin Sun, Di Wu, Sijing Qin Hitotsubashi University, Isao Echizen National Institute of Informatics, Abdallah El Ali Utrecht University and Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica, Saku Sugawara University of Tokyo and National Institute of Informatics
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as automated evaluators (LLM-as-a-Judge). This work challenges its reliability by showing that trust judgments by LLMs are biased by disclosed source labels. Using a counterfactual design, we find that both humans and LLM judges assign higher trust to information labeled as human-authored than to the same content labeled as AI-generated. Eye-tracking data reveal that humans rely heavily on source labels as heuristic cues for judgments. We analyze LLM internal states during judgment. Across label conditions, models allocate denser attention to the label region than the content region, and this label dominance is stronger under Human labels than AI labels, consistent with the human gaze patterns. Besides, decision uncertainty measured by logits is higher under AI labels than Human labels. These results indicate that the source label is a salient heuristic cue for both humans and LLMs. It raises validity concerns for label-sensitive LLM-as-a-Judge evaluation, and we cautiously raise that aligning models with human preferences may propagate human heuristic reliance into models, motivating debiased evaluation and alignment.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Shixuan Ma Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Jiahao Li University of Science and Technology of China, Zhendong Mao University of Science and Technology of China, Quan Wang Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
The widespread deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) has spurred significant progress in the detection of LLM-generated text. However, existing detection methods often rely on statistical features that are insufficient for reliable detection; for example, even though LLM-generated and human-written texts exhibit different probability distributions in surrogate models, they can produce nearly identical entropy values, thereby conflating the two types of text. In this paper, we propose that modulating the decoding temperature and monitoring how the probability distributions respond can better probe the intrinsic discrepancies between two types of text. Building upon this insight, we introduce a new feature termed Temperature Sensitivity (TS) and demonstrate that LLM-generated text tends to exhibit higher TS than human-written text. Finally, we propose NTS, a novel and simple zero-shot detector built upon normalized temperature sensitivity. Extensive experiments across three datasets, multiple domains, and various source models demonstrate the superior effectiveness and robustness of our proposed approach. Code avaliable at: https://github.com/Shixuan-Ma/NTS.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Zhen Wan, Chao-Han Huck Yang NVIDIA Research, Jinchuan Tian, Hanrong Ye NVIDIA, Ankita Pasad NVIDIA, Szu-Wei Fu NVIDIA and Microsoft, Arushi Goel NVIDIA Research, Ryo Hachiuma NVIDIA 等 18 位作者
We introduce a voice-agentic framework that learns one critical omni-understanding skill: knowing when to trust itself versus when to consult external audio perception. Our work is motivated by a crucial yet counterintuitive finding: naively fine-tuning an omni-model on both speech recognition and external sound understanding tasks often degrades performance, as the model can be easily misled by noisy hypotheses. To address this, our framework, Speech-Hands, recasts the problem as an explicit self-reflection decision. This learnable reflection primitive proves effective in preventing the model from being derailed by flawed external candidates. We show that this agentic action mechanism generalizes naturally from speech recognition to complex, multiple-choice audio reasoning. Across the OpenASR leaderboard, which includes seven domain-diverse speech datasets, Speech-Hands consistently outperforms strong baselines by 12.1% WER on the OpenASR benchmark. The model also achieves 77.37% accuracy and high F1 on audio QA decisions, showing robust generalization and reliability across diverse audio question answering datasets. By unifying perception and decision-making, our work offers a practical path toward more reliable and resilient audio intelligence.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL · cs.AI
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Kunal Samanta, Faisal Tareque Shohan, Amine Trabelsi Université de Sherbrooke, Richard Khoury Universite Laval, Université Laval
Multi-party social dialogue remains underexplored in the literature,in part due to the difficulty and cost of evaluation. As a result,recent work on synthetic dialogue generation often relies on automatedmetrics and LLM-as-a-Judge frameworks, despite limited evidence thatsuch judges reflect human preferences in social settings. In this work,we introduce a lightweight and controllable multi-party dialoguegeneration framework (MPOD) as an experimental instrument forstudying generation and evaluation in social interaction. Using thisframework, we conduct human evaluations of open-domain multi-partydialogue simulation and directly compare human judgments againststate-of-the-art LLM judges. Across 319 pairwise comparisons, weobserve near-random agreement between humans and automated judges(Cohen’s \kappa \approx 0.11), driven by systematic behaviorsincluding extreme tie aversion and strong sensitivity toassistant-style verbosity. Crucially, human–human inter-annotatoragreement (\kappa = 0.29) is substantially higher than human–LLMagreement. To isolate themechanism underlying this misalignment, we introduce a controlledTransplant Ablation, showing that LLM judges consistentlyprefer conversations containing a single proprietary, assistant-styleagent. Additional stress tests show that judges prefer GPT-styleconversations even when utterance order is randomly shuffled,indicating insensitivity to conversational structure and coherence.Our findings provide controlled evidence that currentinstruction-tuned LLM judges do not reliably reflect human preferences for naturalness, engagingness, and overall quality in multi-party social dialogue, calling into question their widespreaduse for validating synthetic conversational data.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Hiroyuki Deguchi NTT, Katsuki Chousa Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Japan and NTT Communication Science Laboratories, Yusuke Sakai Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Japan
The hubness problem, in which hub embeddings are close to many unrelated examples, occurs often in high-dimensional embedding spaces and may pose a practical threat for purposes such as information retrieval and automatic evaluation metrics.In particular, since cross-modal similarity between text and images cannot be calculated by direct comparisons, such as string matching, cross-modal encoders that project different modalities into a shared space are helpful for various cross-modal applications, and thus, the existence of hubs may pose practical threats.To reveal the vulnerabilities of cross-modal encoders, we propose a method for identifying the hub embedding and its corresponding hub text.Experiments on image captioning evaluation in MSCOCO and nocaps along with image-to-text retrieval tasks in MSCOCO and Flickr30k showed that our method can identify a single hub text that unreasonably achieves comparable or higher similarity scores than human-written reference captions in many images, thereby revealing the vulnerabilities in cross-modal encoders.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Preethi Seshadri University of California, Irvine, Samuel Cahyawijaya Cohere, Ayomide Odumakinde Cohere, Sameer Singh University of California, Irvine, Seraphina Goldfarb-Tarrant Cohere
Agentic benchmarks increasingly rely on LLM-simulated users to scalably evaluate agent performance, yet the robustness, validity, and fairness of this approach remain unexamined. Through a user study with participants across the United States, India, Kenya, and Nigeria, we investigate whether LLM-simulated users serve as reliable proxies for real human users in evaluating agents on τ-Bench retail tasks. We find that user simulators lack robustness, with agent success rates varying up to 9 percentage points across different user LLMs. Furthermore, simulated users systematically miscalibrate performance, underestimating success on challenging tasks while overestimating moderately difficult ones. African American Vernacular English (AAVE) speakers experience consistently worse success rates and calibration errors than Standard American English (SAE) speakers, with disparities compounding significantly with age. We also find simulated users to be a differentially effective proxy for different populations, performing worst for AAVE and Indian English. Additionally, simulated users introduce conversational artifacts and surface different failure patterns than human users. These findings demonstrate that current evaluation practices risk misrepresenting agent capabilities across diverse user populations and may obscure real-world deployment challenges.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL · cs.AI
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Tianyi Wang, Yixia Li, Long Li Infly Tech, Yibiao Chen, Shaohan Huang, Yun Chen Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Peng Li Tsinghua University, Yang Liu 等 9 位作者
Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) is central to aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) in reasoning tasks with verifiable rewards. However, standard token-level PPO struggles in this setting due to the instability of temporal credit assignment over long Chain-of-Thought (CoT) horizons and the prohibitive memory cost of the value model. While critic-free alternatives like GRPO mitigate these issues, they incur significant computational overhead by requiring multiple samples for baseline estimation, severely limiting training throughput. In this paper, we introduce Sequence-Level PPO (SPPO), a scalable algorithm that harmonizes the sample efficiency of PPO with the stability of outcome-based updates. SPPO reformulates the reasoning process as a Sequence-Level Contextual Bandit problem, employing a decoupled scalar value function to derive low-variance advantage signals without multi-sampling. Extensive experiments on mathematical benchmarks demonstrate that SPPO significantly surpasses standard PPO and matches the performance of computation-heavy group-based methods, offering a resource-efficient framework for aligning reasoning LLMs.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Yixia Li, Yaqing Shi, Zhiwen Ruan, Dongdong Zhang Research, Microsoft, Lingjie Jiang Peking University, Shaohan Huang, Yun Chen Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Guanhua Chen Southern University of Science and Technology 等 9 位作者
Multimodal large language models have advanced rapidly, yet most remain English-centric, as scaling multilingual multimodal instruction tuning is limited by the scarcity and high cost of high-quality non-English image–text supervision. Although multilingual text data is abundant, naive textual fine-tuning can disrupt vision–language alignment and induce catastrophic forgetting. We propose Vision-Free Adaptation (VFA), a framework that decouples multilingual language enhancement from visual alignment by composing complementary task vectors over a shared LLM backbone. Specifically, we fine-tune a base LLM on multilingual text data to derive a multilingual task vector, which is then merged with the vision-aligned task vector of an MLLM. Experiments on five MLLMs across six multilingual multimodal benchmarks show consistent improvements while preserving both general multimodal and text-only capabilities. Moreover, VFA attains competitive performance with a fully multimodally trained model using less than 2% of the text data, demonstrating its efficiency and effectiveness.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL · cs.CV
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Jenna Russell University of Maryland, College Park, Marzena Karpinska Simon Fraser University, Destiny Akinode Pangram Labs, James Zhou, Katherine Thai Pangram, Bradley Emi Pangram Labs, Max Spero Pangram Labs, Mohit Iyyer University of Maryland, College Park
AI is rapidly transforming journalism, but the extent of its use in published newspaper articles remains unclear. We address this gap by auditing a large-scale dataset of 186K articles from online editions of 1.5K American newspapers published in the summer of 2025. Using Pangram, a state-of-the-art AI detector, we discover that approximately 9% of newly-published articles are either partially or fully AI-generated. This AI use is unevenly distributed, appearing more frequently in smaller, local outlets, in specific topics such as weather and technology, and within certain ownership groups. We also analyze 45K opinion pieces from Washington Post, New York Times, and Wall Street Journal, finding that they are 6.4 times more likely to contain AI-generated content than news articles from the same publications, with many AI-flagged op-eds authored by prominent public figures. Despite this prevalence, we find that AI use is rarely disclosed: a manual audit of 100 AI-flagged articles found only five disclosures of AI use. A factuality analysis shows AI-generated articles are 8.2 times more likely to contain hallucinated claims than human-written news. Overall, our audit highlights the immediate need for greater transparency and updated editorial standards regarding the use of AI in journalism to maintain public trust.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Artur Kulmizev, Erika Lombart, Patrick Watrin UCL, Marie-Catherine de Marneffe UCLouvain
Large language models (LLMs) have shown considerable promise for annotation purposes, yet questions remain about their ability to capture human label variation (HLV) — genuine disagreement between annotators often observed across NLP tasks. Here, we investigate how label and explanation variation manifests within and across LLMs with respect to the Natural Language Inference (NLI) task. Using zero-shot prompting with exact human annotation instructions, we treat individual model generations as participants and examine three response sampling strategies: varying generation parameters, leveraging within-family model size differences, and pooling responses from distinct LLMs. We show that, while model ensembles can generate label distributions similar to humans, they likewise exhibit distinct, idiosyncratic judgments and disagreement patterns. We further analyze explanation variation, observing that, although models generate longer explanations than humans, they demonstrate substantially less stylistic diversity. Our findings suggest that, while LLMs may serve as useful tools for generating diverse annotations, they should not be viewed as drop-in replacements for human annotators — particularly in applications requiring authentic representation of diversity in human judgments, such as NLI.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Shikhar Bharadwaj School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Chin-Jou Li School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Yoonjae Kim, Kwanghee Choi University of Texas at Austin, Eunjung Yeo University of Texas at Austin, Ryan Soh-Eun Shim Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Hanyu Zhou, Brendon Boldt School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University 等 16 位作者
Phone recognition (PR) serves as the atomic interface for language-agnostic modeling for cross-lingual speech processing and phonetic analysis. Despite prolonged efforts in developing PR systems, current evaluations only measure surface-level transcription accuracy. We introduce PRiSM, the first open-source benchmark designed to expose blind spots in phonetic perception through intrinsic and extrinsic evaluation of PR systems. PRiSM standardizes transcription-based evaluation and assesses downstream utility in clinical, educational, and multilingual settings with transcription and representation probes. We find that diverse language exposure during training is key to PR performance, encoder-CTC models are the most stable, and specialized PR systems still outperform LALMs. PRiSM releases code, recipes, and datasets to move the field toward multilingual speech models with robust phonetic ability.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Masato Mita Hitotsubashi University, Recruit Co.,Ltd. and The University of Tokyo, Taiga Someya, Ryo Yoshida The University of Tokyo, Yohei Oseki National Institute of Informatics and University of Tokyo
Large Language Models (LLMs) remain substantially less data-efficient than humans. Pre-pretraining (PPT) on synthetic languages has been proposed to close this gap, with prior work emphasizing highly expressive formal languages such as k-Shuffle Dyck. Inspired by the Language Acquisition Device (LAD) hypothesis, which posits that innate constraints preemptively restrict the learner’s hypothesis space to natural-language-like structure, we propose LAD-inspired PPT: pre-pretraining on MP-STRUCT, a formal language whose strings encode hierarchical composition, feature-based dependencies, and long-distance displacement via MERGE, AGREE, and MOVE. A brief 500-step PPT with MP-STRUCT matches strong formal-language baselines in token efficiency while additionally imparting a human-like resistance to structurally implausible languages. Analyzing simplified variants, we find that MP-STRUCT CORE outperforms k-Shuffle Dyck despite not being definable in C-RASP (a formal bound on transformer expressivity), challenging the prior hypothesis that effective PPT languages must be both hierarchically expressive and circuit-theoretically learnable. We show that functional landmarks, which reduce dependency resolution ambiguity, are a key driver, suggesting that effective PPT design depends not only on expressivity but also on the accessibility of dependency resolution.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Mingze Xu, Zijing Zhao, Qiming Peng, Houwen Peng, Han Hu, Zhanhui Kang, Yuxing Han Tsinghua University, Tsinghua University
While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are advancing rapidly, accurately evaluating their capabilities remains challenging. Current paradigms primarily rely on holistic scoring and static leaderboards, which fail to disentangle fine-grained competencies. Specifically, they suffer from “Outcome Bias” by validating only final answers and ignoring intermediate reasoning. To address these limitations, we introduce ATOM (AnaTomy Of MLLM), a novel MLLM-as-a-judge framework designed to shift the focus from ranking to fine-grained diagnosis. ATOM decomposes complex reasoning into atomic criteria anchored in visual elements, enforcing verification against explicit visual facts. Validated on a newly constructed benchmark with rigorous human rankings, ATOM achieves state-of-the-art accuracy, surpassing the strongest baseline by up to 7.92%. Moving beyond ranking, ATOM bridges the gap between assessment and alignment: by pinpointing atomic-level failures, it establishes a closed-loop mechanism for targeted self-correction. This approach enables models to identify and rectify errors autonomously, successfully resolving up to 39.95% of previously failed queries without human intervention.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL · cs.CV
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Venkata S Govindarajan, Laura Biester Middlebury College
Textual humor is enormously diverse and computational studies need to account for this range, including intentionally bad humor. In this paper, we curate and analyze a novel corpus of sentences from the Bulwer-Lytton Fiction Contest to better understand “bad” humor in English. Standard humor detection models perform poorly on our corpus, and an analysis of literary devices finds that these sentences combine features common in existing humor datasets (e.g., puns, irony) with metaphor, metafiction and simile. LLMs prompted to synthesize contest-style sentences imitate the form but exaggerate the effect by over-using certain literary devices, and including far more novel adjective-noun bigrams than human writers.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
As human-agent interaction (HAI) evolves toward long-term social companionship, users expect Original Character (OC) agents to maintain a consistent persona, manage shared memories, and adapt to ever-changing preferences. However, LLM-based agents optimized by prompting or SFT exhibit a generalization gap: they behave as myopic instruction followers, leading to cascading errors in multi-turn interactions. For the agents to learn trajectory-level value functions that enable farsighted decision-making, we propose the NSARL framework, which formalizes OC companion agents’ interactions as a POMDP and decomposes the agent into three sub-policies (Router, Memory, and Persona), optimized via closed-loop RL from AI feedback (RLAIF) with verifiable rewards in a graph-constrained action space. Our preliminary experiments indicate a trade-off: SFT yields stronger persona generation, while NSARL improves structural logic, through conservative strategies (e.g., over-routing) that increase workflow completeness, advocating for a hybrid deployment strategy.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL · cs.AI
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表