Software development sessions often involve several unfinished tasks rather than one issue carried through to completion. As coding agents take on repository-level development, they need to recover an earlier task's requirements and partial progress after intervening work. Existing repository-level benchmarks typically score one issue-to-patch episode and do not directly measure whether an agent can resume a task after advancing other unfinished work in the same repository. We introduce \textbf{\ourmethod}, a benchmark for focus-task resumption in sessions that interleave unfinished tasks drawn from the same source repository, with a persistent checkout for each task. Each focus task is evaluated in matched uninterrupted and switched sessions with identical focus requirements and executable verifiers. The switched session interleaves ordered stages from other unfinished tasks in the same repository, while only the final focus patch is scored. \ourmethod~contains 200 focus tasks from 19 Python repositories, reconstructed from issue, pull-request, and review histories and rendered as 400 matched session specifications. Across 7 coding agents, interleaved unfinished work produces an average focus-task resolution gap of 11.5 percentage points, ranging from 6.0 to 15.0 percentage points. Trajectory analysis identifies cross-task requirement confusion and loss of task state as recurrent resumption behaviors. We introduce a plug-in context-management module that selects task-relevant history and maintains concise task-state summaries. On OpenCode, the module improves focus-task completion under same-repository task switching by 5.5 to 15.5 percentage points across the evaluated models. Code is available at github.com/Miraclecsc/Switch-SWE.
Zhanzhan Zhao, Yi Yang, Xiao Jia, Zeyun Dong, Chenzhang Wang
As large language models (LLMs) blur the boundary between cognition and computation, they reshape knowledge production and collective life. We combine a curated review of 198 papers with computational mapping of 47,719 formally published papers from five databases. Text embeddings, clustering, and topic modeling organize the curated literature into 13 subcategories across three domains. LLM as Social Minds examines mind-like reasoning and socially grounded behavior in individual models. LLM Societies explores how interactions among agents produce collective behavior and social organization. LLM-Human Interactions examines how people perceive and engage with LLMs, and how interaction reshapes human thinking, creativity, and relationships. Structural topic modeling of the larger corpus traces how research attention shifts over time and differs across publication venues. We present a reproducible framework that identifies the field's underlying structure and enables its continuous refinement as new studies emerge. The review also identifies a gap in current understanding: the mechanisms underlying many of LLMs' observed cognitive and social behaviors remain unclear. Human-like performance can then be mistaken for understanding, obscuring the norms, biases, and structures of power that LLMs reproduce. We call for shared benchmarks and robustness checks across the three domains to build a reliable evidence base for understanding LLMs' social behaviors and informing their design and use.
Web systems increasingly predict users' decisions from what users say, yet when interests partly conflict, users may promise to cooperate to win the other side's cooperation and then not do so. Sales or service agents that rely on such promises may grant concessions to users who then do not keep their promises, at a cost to the party they represent. We test how LLMs combine users' statements with decision records to predict users' decisions, using 1,260 rounds in which 42 users played a repeated prisoner's dilemma-style game with five agents, each prompted to express a dominant Big Five trait, and could talk with the agent before every decision. Across eight open-weight LLMs, predictions from decision records separated cooperation from defection well (AUC = .80), and adding dialogue brought no detectable gain. With dialogue, predictions agreed with users' statements more often, and errors concentrated on rounds in which users broke their statements: accuracy on rounds with a statement barely changed (.73 to .74), while it rose on kept statements (.76 to .95) and fell sharply on broken ones (.65 to .17). Predictions weighted statements more heavily than users' behavior warranted: when users stated a decision they had not yet made in that game, the predicted probability of keeping it rose from .13 to .69, whereas users kept .40 of such statements. Users' decisions also varied with the agent they faced, but predictions hardly reflected this: users cooperated more with the Agreeableness agent than with the Extraversion agent (70.6% vs. 54.5%), whereas predicted cooperation was nearly identical (64.5% vs. 63.1%). Users also cooperated more with an agent when they themselves scored higher on that agent's trait, whereas predicted cooperation barely changed with these scores. Dialogue-based predictions should therefore weigh users' statements by their earlier decisions and the agent they face.
Yaxin Luo Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence, Jiacheng Cui, Xiaohan Zhao, Xinyi Shang, Jiacheng Liu Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence, Xinyue Bi, Zhaoyi Li, Zhiqiang Shen Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence
The pretraining data mixture of Large Language Models (LLMs) constitutes their “digital DNA”, shaping model behaviors, capabilities, and failure modes. Yet this composition is rarely disclosed, making post-hoc auditing of data combination or provenance difficult. In this work, we formalize \textbf{Data Mixture Surgery (DMS)}: given only generated text from a target LLM, estimate the domain-level distribution of its pretraining corpus under a predefined taxonomy. We propose \textbf{LLMSurgeon}, a strong framework that casts DMS as an inverse problem under the label-shift assumption. Rather than directly aggregating classifier outputs, LLMSurgeon estimates a calibrated \textit{soft} confusion matrix and solves a constrained inverse problem to correct systematic domain confusion and recover the latent mixture prior. To evaluate, we introduce \textbf{LLMScan}, a recipe-verifiable evaluation suite built from open-source LLMs with transparent pretraining mixtures. Across LLMScan, LLMSurgeon recovers domain mixtures with high fidelity under fixed protocols. Our work presents a practical, post-hoc approach for auditing the \textit{digital DNA} of foundation models without access to their training data. Code is available at: https://github.com/Yaxin9Luo/LLMSurgeon.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Ziqing Wang, Kexin Zhang, Zihan Zhao, Yibo Wen, Abhishek Pandey, Han Liu Northwestern University, Kaize Ding Northwestern University
Large language models (LLMs) are introducing a paradigm shift in molecular discovery by enabling text-guided interaction with chemical spaces through natural language and symbolic notations, with emerging extensions to incorporate multi-modal inputs. To advance this emerging field, this survey provides an up-to-date and forward-looking review of the emerging use of LLMs for two central tasks: molecule generation and molecule optimization. We organize our survey around four fundamental challenges that have emerged as critical evaluation dimensions in recent studies: ensuring validity, enhancing synthesizability, achieving precise property control, and maximizing diversity. Based on this, we systematically analyze how current LLM learning paradigms are applied to tackle each challenge, revealing the distinct capabilities and inherent limitations of each approach. In addition, we include the commonly used datasets and evaluation protocols aligned with these challenges. We conclude by discussing future directions, positioning this survey as a resource for researchers working at the intersection of LLMs and molecular science. A continuously updated reading list is available at https://github.com/REAL-Lab-NU/Awesome-LLM-Centric-Molecular-Discovery.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Sensen Gao, Shanshan Zhao Alibaba Group, Xu Jiang, Lunhao Duan Alibaba Group, Yong Xien Chng Tsinghua University, Tsinghua University, Qing-Guo Chen Alibaba Group, Weihua Luo Alibaba International Digital Commerce Group, Kaifu Zhang Alibaba Group 等 10 位作者
Document understanding is critical for applications from financial analysis to scientific discovery. Current approaches, whether OCR-based pipelines feeding Large Language Models (LLMs) or native Multimodal LLMs (MLLMs), face key limitations: the former loses structural detail, while the latter struggles with context modeling. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) helps ground models in external data, but documents’ multimodal nature, i.e., combining text, tables, charts, and layout, demands a more advanced paradigm: Multimodal RAG. This approach enables holistic retrieval and reasoning across all modalities, unlocking comprehensive document intelligence. Recognizing its importance, this paper presents a systematic survey of Multimodal RAG for document understanding. We propose a taxonomy based on domain, retrieval modality, and granularity, and review advances involving graph structures and agentic frameworks. We also summarize key datasets, benchmarks, and applications, and highlight open challenges in efficiency, fine-grained representation, and robustness, providing a roadmap for future progress in document AI.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL · cs.AI · cs.CV
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Weixin Chen Hong Kong Baptist University, Yuhan Zhao, Jingyuan Huang Rutgers University, Zihe Ye Rutgers University, Mingxuan Ju Snap Inc., Tong Zhao Snap Inc., Neil Shah Snap Inc., Li Chen Hong Kong Baptist University 等 9 位作者
The evolution of recommender systems has shifted from traditional collaborative filtering to LLM-based agentic systems, which rely on semantic user and item memories to make predictions. However, existing agents maintain these memories in isolation. This overlooks crucial collaborative signals, such as user-item co-engagements and peer relationships across the community, which significantly limits their ability to uncover hidden preferences and accurately infer user needs, particularly for data-sparse users. To bridge this gap, we introduce collaborative memory, a paradigm that connects isolated semantics to enable the sharing of relational insights. Yet, naively utilizing collaborative memory causes severe context overload and introduces noise to downstream LLMs, alongside prohibitive computational costs. To resolve this, we propose MemRec, a framework that architecturally decouples memory management from reasoning. MemRec introduces a dedicated, lightweight language model LM_Mem to efficiently manage and synthesize a dynamic collaborative memory graph in the background. It provides only distilled, high-signal contexts to a downstream, heavyweight large language model (LLM_Rec) for the final recommendation. Extensive experiments on four benchmarks demonstrate that MemRec achieves state-of-the-art performance. Code: https://github.com/rutgerswiselab/memrecHomepage: https://memrec.weixinchen.com
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL · cs.AI
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIs
Yujia Qin, Shihao Liang, Yining Ye, Kunlun Zhu, Lan Yan, Yaxi Lu, Yankai Lin, Xin Cong 等 19 位作者
AI 速览：提出涵盖数据构建、模型训练与评估的通用工具使用框架ToolLLM，通过自动构建ToolBench数据集并微调LLaMA得到ToolLLaMA，以提升开源模型的API调用能力。
Despite the advancements of open-source large language models (LLMs), e.g., LLaMA, they remain significantly limited in tool-use capabilities, i.e., using external tools (APIs) to fulfill human instructions. The reason is that current instruction tuning largely focuses on basic language tasks but ignores the tool-use domain. This is in contrast to the excellent tool-use capabilities of state-of-the-art (SOTA) closed-source LLMs, e.g., ChatGPT. To bridge this gap, we introduce ToolLLM, a general tool-use framework encompassing data construction, model training, and evaluation. We first present ToolBench, an instruction-tuning dataset for tool use, which is constructed automatically using ChatGPT. Specifically, the construction can be divided into three stages: (i) API collection: we collect 16,464 real-world RESTful APIs spanning 49 categories from RapidAPI Hub; (ii) instruction generation: we prompt ChatGPT to generate diverse instructions involving these APIs, covering both single-tool and multi-tool scenarios; (iii) solution path annotation: we use ChatGPT to search for a valid solution path (chain of API calls) for each instruction. To enhance the reasoning capabilities of LLMs, we develop a novel depth-first search-based decision tree algorithm. It enables LLMs to evaluate multiple reasoning traces and expand the search space. Moreover, to evaluate the tool-use capabilities of LLMs, we develop an automatic evaluator: ToolEval. Based on ToolBench, we fine-tune LLaMA to obtain an LLM ToolLLaMA, and equip it with a neural API retriever to recommend appropriate APIs for each instruction. Experiments show that ToolLLaMA demonstrates a remarkable ability to execute complex instructions and generalize to unseen APIs, and exhibits comparable performance to ChatGPT. Our ToolLLaMA also demonstrates strong zero-shot generalization ability in an out-of-distribution tool-use dataset: APIBench.