Wuttikorn Ponwitayarat Vidyasirimedhi Institute of Science and Technology, Peerat Limkonchotiwat AI Singapore, Raymond Ng, Jann Railey Montalan Nanyang Technological University and AI Singapore, Thura Aung King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Jian Gang Ngui Nanyang Technological University, Yosephine Susanto National University of Singapore, William Chandra Tjhi National University of Singapore 等 12 位作者
Multilingual text embeddings are often assumed to encode meaning in a perspective-independent semantic space, yielding stable similarity judgments across tasks and languages. Our results show that this assumption does not hold in practice. We introduce SEA-BED, a large-scale benchmark covering 10 Southeast Asian (SEA) languages and diverse embedding tasks, designed to systematically examine how embedding performance varies across tasks, languages, and language-task combinations. Across extensive evaluations, we observe that no single model performs uniformly well across SEA languages; task difficulty differs markedly within languages, and success on one task does not reliably generalize to others. Language-task analyses further reveal highly non-uniform performance landscapes, where performance varies across different language-task combinations. These findings call for closer attention to performance measurements that provide an expansive view across languages and tasks to uncover inconsistencies in semantic representation. Based on these observations, we provide insights for future model development, including data, algorithmic, and architectural considerations.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Shivalika Singh, Angelika Romanou, Clémentine Fourrier, David I. Adelani, Jian Gang Ngui, Daniel Vila-Suero, Peerat Limkonchotiwat, Kelly Marchisio 等 24 位作者
Cultural biases in multilingual datasets pose significant challenges for their effectiveness as global benchmarks. These biases stem not only from differences in language but also from the cultural knowledge required to interpret questions, reducing the practical utility of translated datasets like MMLU. Furthermore, translation often introduces artefacts that can distort the meaning or clarity of questions in the target language. A common practice in multilingual evaluation is to rely on machine-translated evaluation sets, but simply translating a dataset is insufficient to address these challenges. In this work, we trace the impact of both of these issues on multilingual evaluations and ensuing model performances. Our large-scale evaluation of state-of-the-art open and proprietary models illustrates that progress on MMLU depends heavily on learning Western-centric concepts, with 28% of all questions requiring culturally sensitive knowledge. Moreover, for questions requiring geographic knowledge, an astounding 84.9% focus on either North American or European regions. Rankings of model evaluations change depending on whether they are evaluated on the full portion or the subset of questions annotated as culturally sensitive, showing the distortion to model rankings when blindly relying on translated MMLU. We release Global MMLU, an improved MMLU with evaluation coverage across 42 languages -- with improved overall quality by engaging with compensated professional and community annotators to verify translation quality while also rigorously evaluating cultural biases present in the original dataset. This comprehensive Global MMLU set also includes designated subsets labeled as culturally sensitive and culturally agnostic to allow for more holistic, complete evaluation.