跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 21:08 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 22:33 — 2026-11-15 22:33(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 21:08最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 3 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 21:07(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2609.26249

PACE-dLLM: Elastic Block Decoding via Confidence Cliff Estimation for Diffusion Language Models

Xiaocheng Lu, Shuhan Guo, Ziyue Ma, Jie Zhang, Jian Liu, Jingcai Guo, Haoxuan Che, Song Guo

原文摘要

Diffusion language models (dLLMs), such as LLaDA and Dream, have become competitive with autoregressive (AR) LLMs in generation quality while supporting native parallel decoding. A standard acceleration strategy is block-wise decoding, where each forward pass predicts a block of length B and commits high-confidence tokens. Confidence-threshold commitment adapts which tokens are accepted, but a fixed B still constrains the prediction scope. Existing horizon policies use manually chosen sizes, volatility statistics, or candidate-boundary scores. We instead use the model's own per-step confidence: in-window confidence typically follows a context-dependent cliff, providing a direct signal for adapting the look-ahead horizon. In this work, we propose PACE-dLLM, which refits this parametric cliff periodically in closed form, sets the next horizon at a shared confidence anchor, and retains confidence-threshold token commitment. Under a saturated-yield abstraction with iid, policy-independent monotone profiles, the oracle horizon is the smallest attaining maximal per-pass yield and improves the asymptotic forward-pass rate when fixed blocks undershoot it with positive probability. On four reasoning and code benchmarks across two open-source dLLM backbones, PACE-dLLM achieves the best average accuracy among the evaluated decoders on both backbones, with average throughput speedups of 5.23x on LLaDA and 3.06x on Dream (up to 8.52x on LLaDA MATH) over the unaccelerated semi-AR baseline, advancing the quality-throughput Pareto frontier.

cs.CL

首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.1683ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

LazyEviction: Lagged KV Eviction with Attention Pattern Observation for Efficient Long Reasoning

Haoyue Zhang, Hualei Zhang The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Xiaosong Ma Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Jie Zhang Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Song Guo Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

原文摘要

Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit enhanced capabilities by Chain-of-Thought reasoning. However, the extended reasoning sequences introduce significant GPU memory overhead due to increased key-value (KV) cache. Existing KV cache compression methods mitigate memory bottlenecks but struggle in long reasoning tasks. In this paper, we analyze attention patterns in reasoning tasks and reveal a Token Importance Recurrence phenomenon: a large proportion of tokens regain high attention after multiple decoding steps, which is failed to capture by existing works and may lead to unpredictable eviction on such periodically critical tokens. To address this, we propose LazyEviction, an observation window-based lagged eviction framework retaining latent recurring tokens by prioritized eviction based on tokens’ recurrence patterns. Extensive experiments demonstrate that LazyEviction reduces KV cache by 50% 70% while maintaining comparable accuracy, outperforming existing KV cache baselines. Our implementation code can be found at https://github.com/Halo-949/LazyEviction.

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表

首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.1766ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

Think How to Think: Mitigating Overthinking with Autonomous Difficulty Cognition in Large Reasoning Models

Yongjiang Liu, Haoxi Li The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Xiaosong Ma Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Jie Zhang Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Song Guo Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

原文摘要

Recent Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) excel at complex reasoning tasks but often suffer from overthinking, generating overly long and redundant reasoning trajectories. To explore its essence, our empirical analysis reveals that LRMs are primarily limited to recognizing task properties (i.e., difficulty levels) like humans before solving the problem, leading to a one-size-fits-all reasoning strategy. This observation motivates a fundamental question: Can we explicitly bootstrap such ability to alleviate overthinking in LRMs? To this end, we propose Think-How-to-Think (TH2T), a novel two-stage fine-tuning strategy that progressively inspires LRMs’ difficulty cognition and redundancy cognition of LRMs. Specifically, we first inject Difficulty Dypnosis into output prefixes as cues for global, prospective reasoning strategy selection, stimulating the model’s sharper sensitivity to task complexity and adaptive control of reasoning depth. Then, we incorporate Redundancy Hypnosis into in-progress reasoning steps, which serve as local, retrospective signals for behavior correction by identifying and eliminating superfluous reasoning detours. Experiments across 7B/14B/32B models demonstrate that TH2T significantly reduces inference costs by over 70% on easy tasks and 40% on complex ones without compromising performance. The resultant models exhibit a nascent ability for difficulty-aware reasoning, effectively mitigating behaviors like excessive reflection and looping, thereby paving the way for more cognitively efficient LRMs.

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表