Jev enables efficient decision-making with large language models (LLMs) through typed querying primitives, allowing the same semantic state to be expressed in different formats, such as binary and multiple-choice queries. However, the consistency of decisions across primitives has not been systematically evaluated. This work introduces PrimaCons, a four-axis benchmark for assessing cross-primitive consistency while preserving the semantics of the query. Evaluations across three Jev sizes reveal consistency violations across all four axes. Our analysis shows that these violations follow systematic patterns and that cross-primitive discrepancies predict decision failure with a ROC-AUC of 0.91. To mitigate these inconsistencies, we propose the Cross-Primitive Residual Calibrator (CPRC), which attaches a lightweight residual network to a frozen backbone and jointly optimizes predictive accuracy and cross-primitive consistency. Under a leave-one-domain-out protocol, CPRC reduces cross-primitive inconsistency by 58.57% and improves accuracy by +2.97%., demonstrating its effectiveness in both in-domain and out-of-domain settings. Our findings establish cross-primitive consistency as a key dimension for evaluating Jev and provide a practical approach to improving the reliability of its decisions. Code and benchmark is available at https://github.com/67L1/PrimaCons-CRPR.
Text-based Person Anomaly Search (TPAS) retrieves a target pedestrian using natural-language descriptions of appearance and normal or anomalous behavior. Unlike conventional text-based person retrieval, TPAS must preserve identity cues while distinguishing fine-grained behaviors. It presents two challenges: same-identity, different-behavior hard negatives cause gradient conflict during granular alignment, while strong appearance cues can obscure weak behavioral evidence during aggregation. We propose GradCO (behavior-aware Gradient-Conflict Offloading), comprising three complementary components. Behavior-Aware Mixture-of-Experts (B-MoE) forms appearance, normal-behavior, and anomalous-behavior streams whose roles are learned from retrieval objectives without expert-specific semantic labels. Conflict Offload Learning (COL) uses pair-conditioned offload anchors in similarity computation to reduce the conflicting-gradient burden on the main text representations. Hierarchical Intent Alignment (HIA) aggregates expert similarities and features using query-conditioned weights. Experiments on five TPAS/TIPR benchmarks show GradCO significantly surpasses SOTA methods and validate our design.
Xu Liu, Jungang Qiao, Guikun Chen, Xiaojuan Qi, Wenguan Wang
Existing multi-agent collaboration (MAC) methods have primarily explored a group thinking collaboration topology, where agents independently generate solutions and aggregate their outputs. In this work, we investigate an alternative relay thinking topology, where reasoning ownership is dynamically transferred across agents, allowing subsequent agents to inherit and refine an evolving reasoning trajectory. We introduce Multi-Agent Confidence-guided Relay (MACR), a framework that enables dynamical relay collaboration among agents. The key challenge is determining when reasoning should be relayed and which agent should continue the process. method addresses this challenge through confidence-guided relay triggering and a bidding mechanism that selects the next agent based on its confidence. Experiments on four benchmarks show that method outperforms the strongest single-model strategies in accuracy, e.g., +3.3% on MathVista and +3.9% on MMStar, and remains on par with multi-agent strategies while consuming 6.0x less token overhead on HallusionBench and MMStar. Further analysis demonstrates that relay collaboration enables heterogeneous agents to progressively integrate complementary insights, combining heterogeneous capabilities across reasoning stages. Our source code is available at https://github.com/67L1/MACR.