跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+5058新增论文
+4171其中 AI 相关
+108已有论文修订
+122新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-05 02:52 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 02:53各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-04 02:54 — 2026-11-05 02:54(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-05 02:52最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 02:53库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-04 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

13,735 已收录论文11,846 AI 相关3,088 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-05 02:50(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.38197

Convex-SKM-Net: Low-Latency Block Halfspace Corrections for Neural Convex Constraint Satisfaction

Haoyu Zhu, Xiaochen Zhang, Qingchun Hou

Fast inference and strict constraint satisfaction are essential for learning-based decision-making. Existing methods often rely on constraint-specific projections or feasible-set parameterizations, while iterative repair can be costly. We introduce Convex-SKM-Net, a convex constraint-satisfaction layer that forms linearization halfspaces from residual and (sub)gradient oracles without constraint-specific inequality projectors. It applies fixed-depth dual projected-gradient descent (dual PGD) to minimum-displacement block problems using GPU-friendly matrix operations. We jointly learn the predictor and a positive-definite mobility, adapting the correction geometry to improve objective quality. We prove convergence of the outer iterates at fixed dual depth and linear convergence in distance under Slater's condition and bounded subgradients. All our test outputs on three second-order-cone model-predictive control (SOC-MPC) horizons and six power-system convex relaxations satisfy a $10^{-3}$ feasibility tolerance. Comparisons with the latest constraint-satisfaction methods show inference speedups of up to $144.3\times$ on SOC-MPC and $7.7\times$ on a convex quadratically constrained quadratic programming (QCQP) benchmark with joint training. On QCQP, the mean objective gap is $0.012\%$, with full test feasibility at $10^{-4}$. Learning mobility reduces the five-seed affine-task mean gap by $22.4\%$ and improves gaps in matched power-system comparisons.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.LG · cs.AI · math.OC
arXiv ↗PDF ↗